Quote:
Originally Posted by Brainiac
The other four pages of the article support the argument that the Office of Aging made an arbitrary decision that went AGAINST the wishes of the family.
I really don't understand why anyone would defend this decision. It sounds pretty ****ed up to me.
|
With all due respect, if she could not carry on a conversation as stated in the court report and the family went on and did nothing, why should they listen to the family?