Originally Posted by Brainiac
A bureacrat who offered no evidence to support his claim.
His statement that they have not possessed the ability to reason since 2007 is actually just inflammatory bullshit if it's not backed up by a shred of evidence, and it sounds like a ****ing bureacrat trying to cover his own ass. You may decide to find it convincing. I don't.
I realize that it's a lot easier to mock this with inflammatory language of your own than it is to suggest that somebody actually check this out. But sometimes actually checking things out is the right thing to do.
Just because it was not mentioned in this article does not mean that he had no evidence to his claim.