Originally Posted by sportsshrink
One "excellent" read but very long. I only pasted the first segment here in this thread so just go to the link for the rest. For those who bought into the argument that Clarence Thomas just shadows Scalia and is no intellectual giant better think again.
Toobin of the New Yorker who is a big Progressive Lib writes an excellent piece about Thomas and his wife and how they are working against Obamacare and creating the "Constitutional Infrastructure Argument" ahead of time so as to defeat Obamacare by the time it hits the SC for a decision.
Toobin writes this piece IMO for 2 big reasons. 1)He is alerting his Marxist friends that Thomas is not F'ing around and is to be taken serious because he has been very successful in any legal argument against liberalism he pursues. 2) Which means now the "Alinskyizing of Clarence and his wife must begin with the intensity never seen before in hopes that the public will want Thomas to be recused, step down because of a conflict of interest.
I'll apologize in advance for my ignorance. I've seen you use the term "Alinskyize" several times on this forum, but I don't understand what you mean.
I've even Googled the term, and I assume that you're using it in reference to Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals, but I don't get what you're saying.