Quote:
Originally Posted by rfaulk34
I was thinking somewhere between the '14 and '16 team. Not as good as '14 but potentially better than '16.
|
2014-2015 had a mix of experienced players and talented freshmen (Booker was coming off the bench).
This team isn’t that good, but it should hold its weight against 2016-2017 depending on how Bradshaw develops. This team may be even better than that depending on how Dillingham, Sheppard, and Wagner develop as well. I’d take all of them over Briscoe offensively now and TBD if any of them can be as good as Fox. They don’t need to be as natural of a shooter as Monk (who was streaky as hell), but if they can defend they’ll be better than him overall if they can replicate even 70-80% of what he was offensively.
Need to see how they play defensively.