Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief
Interesting that a lot more of you aren’t open to trading our first for him.
1) he’s a super cheap player at a position of need that has proven the ability to be extremely effective at multiple positions.
2) our first rounder will be a bottom pick in the first.
3) we would have him for 4 cost controlled years.
4) trading for MF would give KC the cap space to also keep Chris Jones long term while trading for an established veteran would make that negotiation more difficult (but still possible).
....
I just don’t see any reasoning of why we wouldn’t be willing to trade a first for him.
Give me the logic behind not trading a first for him.
|
I was against a first initially but after a little research im alot more open to it. Im not really interested in a first plus, but just our 32 pick and i could live with it.