Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
Believe it or not, there exists a reality where you can see totally blown coverages while not actually knowing whose fault it is. And yeah, it's pretty damned likely that you didn't know the concept when the universal term for it was completely alien to the entire board until three days ago despite it being around for years.
But hey, since you apparently think this board is good at it, why not start predicting coverages in the game threads based on pre-snap looks? Surely that would be possible?
Or maybe they're just recycling bullshit they heard on TV. Of course, you wouldn't be familiar with that either, what with your only companion in life being your remote.
|
People were conversing, and you felt it incumbent on yourself to enter the conversation in order to advise all those conversing that they were not qualified to converse.
Yeah, I'm the one with problems.
You called everyone in the thread morons, and I said that might be an overreach.
Yeah, I'm the one despised.
Motes and beams, brother. . . . Motes and beams.