View Single Post
Old 10-12-2018, 06:00 AM   #121
kccrow kccrow is offline
MVP
 
kccrow's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
Casino cash: $2967078
I love a 4-3. I think the base fits better against the current NFL because you have 4 guys dedicated to the LOS and usually employ a WOLB that can cover well. You usually have quicker, penetrating defensive lineman and quicker OLBs as a whole. You're already ahead of the game when it comes to switching to a subpackage. Running a 3-4 means slower personnel and, in the case of the Chiefs, having two slow ILBs.

Houston at LDE and a rotation of Jones/Speaks and Nnadi/Williams on the interior looks good. The question, really, is if Kpass can be a true RDE. Ford is a bit too light in the pants and would really need to just be let go unless he were signed as a situational rusher but I think he'd be a bit expensive for that.

Linebacker becomes a huge problem. The Chiefs might have a WOLB in Niemann. I think you'd do okay with Hitchens at SOLB or MLB. You can't put Ragland (just slow) or Smith (just completely sucks) in this defense. Dorian O'Daniel, I think he remains a subpackage linebacker that maybe takes the place of Hitchens on passing downs. Who knows what he really is yet. You're probably re-tooling the linebackers. This team really needs two free safeties as it is, one to play single high and one to play $ situationally.

I support the transition because you really have the same # of holes as current. Only difference is whether or not Tanoh can replace Ford and be an every-down DE.
Posts: 12,682
kccrow 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.kccrow 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.kccrow 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.kccrow 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.kccrow 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.kccrow 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.kccrow 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.kccrow 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.kccrow 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.kccrow 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.kccrow 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.
    Reply With Quote