Quote:
Originally Posted by hitchief
Well, if Andy tells us we're good on D, we're good, right? Not so much.
Thank god we picked up an expensive wr in FA. Just the piece of the puzzle this team was missing. I mean, its easy to understand by looking at the O and D stats last year that it was the O that needed to lose its best player and the O that needed a new toy.
Stupid IMO but we shall see. I think its as simple as Andy wanting Pat to succeed and make him look good and doesn't care that the D will suck ass next year. It gives him an excuse with Hunt - the O isn't the problem Clark, its the D, so keep me and get rid of that old rat DC.
|
Huh? So we traded for Fuller, signed Hitchens to a big contract- dumped most of our CB's because Andy does not care about the Defense?
I think you are looking at things through a thick pair of Negative glasses. By the time camp gets here, we will add at least 2 more starters on D and a lot of depth players. I don't expect them to be the 85 Bears but they won't be close to the same unit as last year either-which will be a huge improvement.