Quote:
Originally Posted by hitchief
Well, if Andy tells us we're good on D, we're good, right? Not so much.
Thank god we picked up an expensive wr in FA. Just the piece of the puzzle this team was missing. I mean, its easy to understand by looking at the O and D stats last year that it was the O that needed to lose its best player and the O that needed a new toy.
Stupid IMO but we shall see. I think its as simple as Andy wanting Pat to succeed and make him look good and doesn't care that the D will suck ass next year. It gives him an excuse with Hunt - the O isn't the problem Clark, its the D, so keep me and get rid of that old rat DC.
|
I am going to assume that you meant to type D here. Unless you're an Alexsexual. Because Smith and Wilson were the only players we lost on offense and I don't know many that think either of them was our best player. The loss of Peter's, though not the best player on the D either, seems to make more sense. But if Berry comes back healthy, he is our best player on D.