Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBeauford
I'll say it: not only was the style of Alex Smith Football anti-fun to watch, but we had limited success in the playoffs. Mahomes at the bare minimum looks to satisfy the fun to watch criteria.
|
How did your fun-o-meter register when DT, Neil, Saleaumua, Carter, et al shut people down week after week?
How about when Green, our O-line, Priest and Gonzo were matriculating all over?
How does your fun-o-meter spike when the Pro Bowl QB skills competition comes up once a year?
I'm trying to get on everyone's page. Because if history is any indication, if a fan 'enjoys' the Chiefs the 'wrong way' they are in for a world of hurt from a vindictive fanbase.
I watch lots of football, more than just the Chiefs. I saw plenty of 'fun' QB from the likes of Marino's Dolphins, the Lions of the past decade, the Cowboys under Romo, the Colts before Manning got a defense to help him, Cunningham and Moss with the Vikings, etc. etc.
Do we want fun, or do we want to win a championship.
And while we're at it, why do we even pay non-QBs to play for us? We don't respect them. We don't like them. They're apparently ornaments. We gave millions to Houston, DJ, Berry, Priest, LJ, Charles, Gonzo, Roaf, Waters, etc. etc. for absolutely no value. Shouldn't we propose they play for us for the opportunity to raise their profile so they can make their wasted millions elsewhere for inferior teams?
If you're a Chiefs fan, be a fan of the Chiefs. If you're a fan of fun QB play, just admit it proudly.