Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud
John Dorsey reports to Clark Hunt. If Clark Hunt has a difficult time, personally, with John Dorsey, that's a negative.
If Clark Hunt has difficulty with the ongoing issues with the Salary Cap, overseen by John Dorsey, that's another negative.
If Clark Hunt has difficulty with John Dorsey cutting a 3rd rounder that was selected just months before, that's another negative.
If Clark Hunt has difficulty with John Dorsey signing Dwayne Bowe to a $55 million dollar deal and cutting him two years into the contract, that's another negative.
If Clark Hunt has difficulty with John Dorsey signing Jeremy Maclin to a $55 million dollar deal and cutting him two years into the contract, that's another negative.
I can go on and on and on about this but it's pretty clear that Hunt's decision was based on the cumulative effect of Dorsey's decisions and with the contract impasse, decided to cut the cord and move on.
|
Since Hunt was engaged in negotiations to extend Dorsey, the cumulative effect of Dorsey's "transgressions" must've still been positive. Heck, maybe it just all boiled down to something in the proposed contract that Hunt and Dorsey could not agree on. I just don't see how Dorsey's prior performance would be viewed as negative by Hunt if he was all about extending him. Or, I guess it could've come down to Hunt just not wanting to mess with Dorsey and his ways anymore -- of course, if that was the case, he shouldn't have been negotiating with him in the first place.