Quote:
Originally Posted by kysirsoze
I don't know that that's true. It could be a question of how much. It could be how that money is paid. It could be to ensure that he doesn't have the option to decide to stop paying.
This also doesn't address the assertion that he has never seen his son.
Not saying the worst isn't true. Just not seeing the evidence.
|
Okay, you're talking out of your ****ing ass. Do some homework, Bitch!
Neg rep for being a ****ing lowlife asshole.
---------
http://www.kansascity.com/sports/nfl...126377814.html
In September, Hill’s victim filed a paternity suit in Payne County, Okla. According to the record, though, “both parties openly acknowledge paternity.”
She also requested to maintain custody of the child, a boy who turned one in July.
“Respondent (Hill) has not ever seen the minor child,” according to the documents filed four months ago. “Any visitation with the minor child by Respondent should be supervised until such time as he can establish a relationship with the child and his domestic violence probation is complete.”