Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/project...ranscript.html
That site has several of the excerpts.
While I agree that the blood evidence was likely way too complicated for the jurors to understand, the LAPD did such a horrific job of protecting the crime scene against contamination that regardless of the results, it's easy to dismiss it altogether.
Additionally, to the this day, I have a very difficult time believing that OJ carried out the murders alone. Ron Goldman wasn't an old, tiny guy. He was young and physically fit. Unless he walked in after OJ killed Nicole, it's difficult to imagine that a 48 year old man in OJ's physical condition would only walk away with a nick on his middle knuckle. I'm not saying that it's impossible but it's difficult to believe he could pull that off, head home as quickly as the prosecution suggested, shower, get to the airport in time to make his flight and not crack. IMO, it just doesn't add up.
From my perspective, in all likelihood, the LAPD framed a guilty man.
|
So despite all of that in bold, you believe he was guilty?
Talk about giving in to board peer pressure to appease some on this board......Speak your mind. If you don't think he was guilty, say it. None of us were there. Nobody can call anybody's position stupid.