ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Misc A story made for ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=291384)

BigMeatballDave 03-17-2015 05:01 PM

A story made for ChiefsPlanet
 
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2...dogs/23991779/


A class-action lawsuit claims that the popular Beneful brand of dog food from Nestle Purina is killing dogs, reports the Top Class Actions blog. Plaintiff Frank Lucido alleges that one of his three dogs died and two others became seriously ill because of the dry "kibble" food, which the lawsuit blames on unsafe levels of propylene glycol and mycotoxins; the Daily Beast explains the latter are essentially a "toxic byproduct of mold." The former is an FDA-approved additive that also happens to be a chemical used in antifreeze, though it's a stand-in for the more toxic ethylene glycol. WLWT reports propylene glycol is barred from cat food per the FDA, but a vet tells KTUL it hasn't been proven as dangerous for dogs. One of Lucido's attorneys says the suit has become a class-action one because of similar complaints that have been piling up over the years.

BigMeatballDave 03-17-2015 05:03 PM

I don't think Purina did anything intentional.

I think someone has tampered with the products.

Rausch 03-17-2015 05:04 PM

Lovely...

Psyko Tek 03-17-2015 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave (Post 11389272)
I don't think Purina did anything intentional.

I think someone has tampered with the products.

bet the shit is made in china
and they will put anything in what they make

Saccopoo 03-17-2015 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psyko Tek (Post 11389436)
bet the shit is made in china
and they will put anything in what they make

It has nothing to do with China.

There have been numerous undercover investigations of the pet food industry which reveal absolutely horrific production processes.

I remember one such deal where a company was found dumping euthanized dogs and cats into the kibble vats, plastic bags and all. Another guy filmed a company backhoe'ing piles of chickens into the vats that were covered in green, cancerous blisters and mold.

All that material that is unfit for human consumption? Right into the dog and cat food. They refer to it as the 4D - dead, dying, diseased and decayed.

You don't ever wonder what "meat by-products" are when they are listed on that bag of dog food? Road kill? Dead zoo animals? Anything to bolster the bottom line.:

Quote:

Let's start with what usually appears as the protein source and the primary ingredient in pet food: Meat byproducts or meat meal. Both are euphemisms for the parts of animals that wouldn't be considered meat by any smart consumer. The well-known phrase "meat byproducts" is a misnomer since these byproducts contain little, if any, meat. These are the parts of the animal left over after the meat has been stripped away from the bone. "Chicken by-products include head, feet, entrails, lungs, spleen, kidneys, brain, liver, stomach, bones, blood, intestines, and any other part of the carcass not fit for human consumption," writes Henry Pasternak in Healing Animals with Nature's Cures.
Meat meal can contain the boiled down flesh of animals we would find unacceptable for consumption. This can include zoo animals, road kill, and 4-D (dead, diseased, disabled, dying) livestock. Most shockingly, this also can include dogs and cats. That's right, your pets could be cannibals. Fast Food Nation author Eric Schlosser writes, "Although leading American manufacturers promise never to put rendered pets into their pet food, it is still legal to do so. A Canadian company, Sanimal Inc., was putting 40,000 pounds of dead dogs and dead cats into its dog and cat food every week, until discontinuing the practice in June 2001. "This food is healthy and good," said the company's vice president of procurement, responding to critics, ''but some people don't like to see meat meal that contains any pets."
Quote:

Rendering practices aren't just gross; they're also dangerous for your pets. The chemicals used to euthanize zoo animals, dogs and cats can survive the cooking process, which means these chemicals end up in pet food, and ultimately, in your pet. Martin writes, "Euthanized cats and dogs often end up in rendering vats along with other questionable material to make meat meal, and meat and bone meal. This can be problematic because sodium pentobarbital can withstand the heat from rendering. For years, some veterinarians and animal advocates have known about the potential danger of sodium pentobarbital residue in commercial pet food, yet the danger has not been alleviated." In short, that means the poisons designed to kill pets are the same ones being fed to them.

Eleazar 03-17-2015 08:10 PM

Wellness only for my boy. :shake:

Coochie liquor 03-17-2015 08:26 PM

Dogs eat poop, vomit, etc and aren't getting sick from that?? Must be some ****ed up stuff in dog food.

bobbymitch 03-17-2015 10:17 PM

If you ever go through a large beef slaughtering operation (think the likes of IBP), one extremely gut spasming area is the cooking area where all the "by-products" are rendered down for dog food. The smell is right up there with a hide cleaning plant.

jspchief 03-17-2015 10:36 PM

Pretty much everything that goes into pet food is some factory's byproduct. Defective/contaminated pasta, etc.

BucEyedPea 03-17-2015 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psyko Tek (Post 11389436)
bet the shit is made in china
and they will put anything in what they make

I was wonderin' the same thing. I won't buy supplements made there, due to the garbage that's in them.

DaneMcCloud 03-17-2015 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 11389755)
Pretty much everything that goes into pet food is some factory's byproduct. Defective/contaminated pasta, etc.

This is why I feed my Labs very small helpings of dog food and supplement their diets with baby carrots, lettuce and broccoli.

BucEyedPea 03-17-2015 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11389477)
It has nothing to do with China.

Oh, I wouldn't say it has "nothing" to do with China, even if there's any problems here. There's been pet food recalls on food for pets made in China.
I remember one from about 7'ish years ago.

See if I can find something on it:
Quote:

The 2007 pet food recalls comprise the contamination and wide recall of many brands of cat and dog foods beginning in March 2007, and the ensuing developments involving the human food supply. The recalls in North America, Europe, and South Africa came in response to reports of renal failure in pets. Initially, the recalls were associated with the consumption of mostly wet pet foods made with wheat gluten from a single Chinese company.
Quote:

One month after the initial recall, contaminated rice protein from a different source in China was also identified as being associated with kidney failure in pets in the United States, while contaminated corn gluten was associated with kidney failure with pets in South Africa. As a result of investigating the 2007 pet food recalls, a broader Chinese protein export contamination investigation unfolded, raising concerns about the safety of the human food supply.
Quote:

The growing number of recalls has motivated at least one well-known animal protection organization, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) to recommend "until this crisis is resolved ... pets be fed products containing U. S.-sourced protein supplements only."[52]
More info in the link with Nestlé Purina named.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_pet_food_recalls

lawrenceRaider 03-18-2015 08:42 AM

I gave Beneful a try for my dogs once. It made them both sick, runs, vomiting. I now go with the store brand grain free stuff from Costco/Sams. I think the Sams variety actually has the better ingredient list.

kcfanXIII 03-18-2015 12:25 PM

I fed this shit to my dog for a few years. He would get terrible skin allergies from spring to fall. He would scratch and lick himself until he had patches of fur missing. I put him on steroids to fix it for a couple years. Then, in an unrelated discussion with my vet, I asked about some rumors I had heard regarding Beneful, and if it was as bad for my dog as I had heard. Her face was priceless as she told me it was like feeding children a diet consisting of twinkies and ho hos. After hearing this from my vet, (keep in mind I went to her for advice on the subject, this wasn't her getting on a soap box) I started researching alternatives and switched him to Iams. Later that year I noticed his allergies weren't occuring. That was probably 5 years ago, and I haven't had the skin allergy issue since. I would never go back to Beneful, and I tell everyone I see at the store getting it about my boy's story.

Jimmya 03-18-2015 12:50 PM

I took my dog off of it because of skin rashes and overall poor health. He's better now.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.