ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   D.C. (http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   U.S. Issues Expanded background checks for gun sales fails in Senate (http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=272206)

Taco John 04-17-2013 03:51 PM

Expanded background checks for gun sales fails in Senate
 
Expanded background checks for gun sales fails in Senate, delivering blow to Newtown families and Obama

WASHINGTON – Compromise legislation to expand mandatory background checks for gun sales -- a key element of the federal response to the elementary school massacre in Newtown, Conn. – failed Wednesday afternoon in the US Senate.

The inability of President Obama and Democratic leaders to round up the required 60 votes in favor of enhanced background checks dealt a striking defeat to a major initiative of the president’s second term, falling short despite numerous pleas and trips to Washington by families of the Sandy Hook Elementary School victims, whose children were murdered five months ago by a lone gunman with a semi-automatic assault rifle.

The Senate voted Wednesday afternoon to block the first of nine amendments to Obama’s gun control bill, a compromise forged between senators Joe Manchin, a Democrat from West Virginia, and Pat Toomey, a Republican from Pennsylvania to expand background checks for gun buyers.

Despite the bipartisan negotiations, the amendment failed when only 54 senators voted to proceed, falling six votes short. All New England senators voted yes except for Senator Kelly Ayotte, a Republican from New Hampshire.

“Shame on you!” a spectator in the gallery yelled out in the chamber, prompting a gavel for order.

Erica Lafferty, 27, the daughter of Dawn Hochsprung, principal of Sandy Hook who lost her life in the shooting, said she was disappointed by the vote “but the fact that it got to the floor is good.”

“I’m confident that it will be back, and I also know that I will be here when it does come back,” Lafferty said. “We’re not going away.”

Senator John McCain, an Arizona Republican, praised Manchin and Toomey for their efforts during the debate preceding the series of votes.

“You did the right thing,” McCain said. “What they have tried to do today I think is an act that should be appreciated by those of us who many times avoid taking the tough decisions.”

Senator Christopher Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat in favor of gun control, spoke out against the outsized influence of the gun lobby.

“The longer that I’ve spent in this place, the more I’m convinced that there are people who actually do believe that we should just go back to the days of the wild, wild west,” Murphy said, “that we should usher in a new era of gun control Darwinism in which the good guys have guns, the bad guns, and we just hope that the good guys shoot the bad guys.”

Because of senate procedural rules, a 60-vote threshhold was required for each of the nine amendments to proceed. The other amendments include an assault weapons ban and limits on high capacity magazines.

The gun debate has been marked by intense lobbying on both sides, big-spending influence campaigns targeting individual senators, and some vitriolic attacks, particularly by some groups opposed to firearms restrictions.

Groups beyond the National Rifle Association, the traditional representative of the gun lobby, have played a major role in the debate. The National Association for Gun Rights used email alerts, online videos, and a Facebook page to convey mocking imagery that targeted individual senators.

In a series of Facebook posts, the group showed Obama as a puppeteer, controlling the strings of Toomey. Stamped in red ink is, “Toomey Sold Out Your Gun Rights.”

The gun rights group similarly depicted all 16 Republicans who voted last week to prevent a GOP filibuster and move forward on the gun legislation debate. The 16 also are shown with their faces on sticks, tagged by Facebook users with unfriendly names. Senator Lamar Alexander, of Tennessee, is “Socialist.” Senator Tom Coburn, of Oklahoma, is “communist #9.” Senator John Hoeven, of South Dakota, is “Judas Bastard.”

Senator Kelly Ayotte, of New Hampshire, is “liberal [expletive] 1” while Senator Susan Collins, of Maine, is “liberal [expletive] 2.”

Polls show that nearly 90 percent of Americans support a strong system of background checks for gun purchases. But the looming failure of gun-control legislation illustrates how vocal minorities are exerting strong influence on congressional debates by targeting individual senators with outside pressure, channeled through Internet organizing.

Some of that organizing directly targets senators who seek compromise.

“NO DEALS, NO GUN CONTROL,” the National Association for Gun Rights blasts on its website.

Few have experienced as much heat as Collins, a Maine Republican who has built a reputation for being moderate and open to compromise. A host of groups in recent days have taken out ads in Maine trying to win her over, including groups supporting gun-control legislation.

Organizing for Action, an offshoot of President Obama’s campaign network, ran an ad Friday on the Bangor Daily News website with this message: “Tell Senator Collins: It’s time to close background check loopholes.” That ad came a day after a full-page ad from the National Rifle Association that asked, “Will Obama’s gun control proposals actually work? His own experts say, ‘No.’”

The group on Monday posted a doctored and unflattering photo of Collins with her eyes bulging as if she were a zombie. Within an hour, 5,413 people liked it on Facebook and 490 people had commented on it.

Senator Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican, Wednesday morning criticized the president for using the Newtown, Conn., families “as props.”

At a breakfast with reporters sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor, he said the legislation would not have prevented the Sandy Hook shootings, and he criticized the vote as being mostly for show.

“A lot of things in Washington are window dressing, it’s a dog and pony show, it’s a parade, it’s theatrics, it’s histrionics, all to show people that something bad happened — which it did. Something terribly tragic happened,” he said.

But, he added, “None of the proposals really would have addressed the tragedy.”

http://www.boston.com/politicalintel...E3M/story.html

Taco John 04-17-2013 03:53 PM

Obama is pissed. His speech sounds exasperated.

Taco John 04-17-2013 03:55 PM

I thought for sure that this would pass. I'm quite surprised that it didn't. No filibuster needed.

BucEyedPea 04-17-2013 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 9596569)
I thought for sure that this would pass. I'm quite surprised that it didn't. No filibuster needed.

I did too but felt it wouldn't make it in the House anyway. Glad to see Obama exasperated and defeated on this, but I doubt it will stop him from using EO's.

FD 04-17-2013 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 9596569)
I thought for sure that this would pass. I'm quite surprised that it didn't. No filibuster needed.

??? The vote was 54-46 in favor, it was defeated via filibuster.

Taco John 04-17-2013 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FD (Post 9596592)
??? The vote was 54-46, it was defeated via filibuster.

I guess I didn't read the story close enough.

ptlyon 04-17-2013 04:04 PM

CRY YOU LITTLE BITCH, CRY!!! ROFL

Munson 04-17-2013 04:18 PM

Great news. :clap:

Not to mention Feinstein's new Assault Weapons Ban was defeated 40 votes for, 60 votes against. :thumb:

Also, there was a vote on national CCW reciprocity. Unfortunately it didn't pass, but got got 57 votes for, 43 against. It got more votes than the Toomey/Manchin bill. In other words, more Senators voted to expand gun rights than take them away.

Mr. Laz 04-17-2013 04:22 PM

I think they should have a holiday like Halloween, only for guns.


Trick or Treat or Firearm


bag full o' assault weapons for everybody

Mr. Laz 04-17-2013 04:23 PM

not surprised it didn't pass ... votes are for sale in washington

NRA has billions behind it

Congress got rich

Count Zarth 04-17-2013 04:25 PM

LMFAO

Suck it Liberals.

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopo...e-senate-5.jpg

LiveSteam 04-17-2013 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9596687)

ROFLROFLROFL

BucEyedPea 04-17-2013 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9596685)
not surprised it didn't pass ... votes are for sale in washington

NRA has billions behind it

Congress got rich

There wouldn't have been the votes in the House anyway. It was a bad bill that the federal govt had not authority to even consider. The Constitution is NOT for sale either.

mlyonsd 04-17-2013 04:35 PM

Don't pretend this is over.

The next mass murder with a firearm and the hand wringers will be back out.

Eventually they will convince a stupid public that it is better to take rights away from law abiding citizens than actually punishing criminals that use guns to commit crime.

BucEyedPea 04-17-2013 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlyonsd (Post 9596715)
Don't pretend this is over.

The next mass murder with a firearm and the hand wringers will be back out.

Eventually they will convince a stupid public that it is better to take rights away from law abiding citizens than actually punishing criminals that use guns to commit crime.

True enough! Plus, Obama vows to fight on with this.


"President Obama lashes out at lawmakers who failed a bill supported by most Americans, and vows to continue the gun control fight."

http://www.nationaljournal.com/domes...ntrol-20130321


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.