ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   D.C. (http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   Another hit against the WH: Oil Execs lied to Congress (http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=129161)

memyselfI 11-16-2005 08:25 PM

Another hit against the WH: Oil Execs lied to Congress
 
about their meeting with Cheney's energy task force. Joe Scarborough was on earlier and was furious. He had Barbara Boxer on his show for the second week in a row talking about the evils of
'big oil.' He is fighting mad about the oil companies. Baba O'Reilly has been as well. This isn't a liberal or conservative issue...

but it sure won't help the WH to have their buddies in the oil business under investigation for lying to congress about secret meetings with that man of impeccable character and integrity, Dick Cheney. ROFL

Is EVERYTHING this WH touches turning to stone? :hmmm:

CNN featured Pete Dominici saying that even without an oath if the Execs lied to congress they could still face criminal charges. ROFL


http://www.forbes.com/work/feeds/afx...fx2342263.html
US senators demand oil executives re-testify, under oath
11.16.2005, 06:46 PM


WASHINGTON (AFX) - Senate Democrats demanded that oil company executives who testified last week about skyrocketing energy prices reappear before lawmakers and testify under oath, after news reports raised questions about the truthfulness of their testimony.

Leading oil company executives long have denied taking part in a secretive energy task force run in 2001 by Vice President Dick Cheney, but White House records obtained by The Washington Post refuted that, according to the daily's editions on Wednesday.

The ad hoc group was tasked with helping develop a national energy policy, but was opposed by environmentalists because there allegedly were no ecologically friendly players on the panel.

The leader of Senate Democrats said the oil company executives who testified last week should be forced to return to Congress to set the record straight regarding their involvement with Cheney's group.

'When the big oil companies came to Congress to testify about their record profits, we expected that they would tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Today, we learned that this was a standard they were not prepared to meet,' said Senator Harry Reid.

Democrats also objected to a decision by the leaders of the Republican-led Senate to waive swearing in the witnesses. At any future hearing, Reid said, the executives should testify under oath.

Meanwhile, Democratic Senator Frank Lautenberg called at a press conference for an investigation.

'I want to be certain that this gets an appropriate review, so I've written to the attorney general asking him to investigate whether any of these oil company CEOs broke the law by making false statements to the Congress,' Lautenberg said.

jiveturkey 11-16-2005 08:28 PM

I heard that people can be shot for posting this type of garbage. :)

memyselfI 11-16-2005 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jiveturkey
I heard that people can be shot for posting this type of garbage. :)

I heard that people who post this kind of garbage obviously forgot about 9/11. :hmmm:

penchief 11-17-2005 12:15 PM

Well, most people probably don't think so but this is significant for a couple of reasons, IMO.

First, those meetings should not have been secret to begin with. This is a democracy and one of the most important ingredients to perserving a democracy is transparency in government. Unfortunately for America, Cheneyburton does not believe in transparency. Even more discouraging is the fact that this administration obviously does not believe in democracy, itself. Nor do they trust the people of this country with the truth.

That alone is sad.

The second reason this is significant, IMO, is because it may ultimately force the release of those who participated in those secret meetings. If an investigation is launched it is quite possible that we may finally be able find out. I have always contended that it is most likely Haliburton and Enron were major players. If so, the discovery of what may have been discussed could bring revelations.

Was the desire to invade Iraq discussed at Cheneyburton's secret Energy Task Force Meetings? If so, might that support the claims by former White House officials who insist that Iraq was on the agenda from day one? And if that were found to be true, wouldn't that expose the charade this administration has been playing all along when justifing their policy of pre-emption? In turn, wouldn't it also expose the misleading nature of all their rhetoric leading up to the war and their talking points since in defense of the war?

For the sake of democracy and liberty, we can only hope so.

Comrade Crapski 03-22-2013 02:44 PM

Says the biggest Obamunist stooge on the planet.

Quote:

Originally Posted by penchief (Post 2832683)
Well, most people probably don't think so but this is significant for a couple of reasons, IMO.

First, those meetings should not have been secret to begin with. This is a democracy and one of the most important ingredients to perserving a democracy is transparency in government. Unfortunately for America, Cheneyburton does not believe in transparency. Even more discouraging is the fact that this administration obviously does not believe in democracy, itself. Nor do they trust the people of this country with the truth.

That alone is sad.

The second reason this is significant, IMO, is because it may ultimately force the release of those who participated in those secret meetings. If an investigation is launched it is quite possible that we may finally be able find out. I have always contended that it is most likely Haliburton and Enron were major players. If so, the discovery of what may have been discussed could bring revelations.

Was the desire to invade Iraq discussed at Cheneyburton's secret Energy Task Force Meetings? If so, might that support the claims by former White House officials who insist that Iraq was on the agenda from day one? And if that were found to be true, wouldn't that expose the charade this administration has been playing all along when justifing their policy of pre-emption? In turn, wouldn't it also expose the misleading nature of all their rhetoric leading up to the war and their talking points since in defense of the war?

For the sake of democracy and liberty, we can only hope so.


FishingRod 03-22-2013 03:56 PM

So what is it Big oil is accused of doing? Does meeting with the VP = "a secretive energy task force"? For the most part when congress tries to dress down the big boys of industry congress comes across looking pretty uneducated.

FishingRod 03-22-2013 04:11 PM

Hey screw this it is Beer and BB time go KU


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.