ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Fantasy/CasinoPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   2013 Sandbox Simulations League 1 Thread (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=273039)

cdcox 05-27-2013 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 9713498)
That's become clear to me in the past couple of weeks looking at these rosters. I'd think, "Okay, that guy's good. I've got that position nailed down." And then I'd do some quick research and discover that he's been released and no one has signed him. Some of these guys had pretty good stats in 2012 and they're not homeless. It's amazing.

I wonder what the distribution of career incomes is for players who at one time or another make it to a 53 man roster? I think it would be pretty eye opening to these kids who think they have it made once they make it to the NFL. I bet the median career earnings is below $1M, which isn't enough to retire on at age 25.

As you point out, even the vets that are in their prime can be out of the game before they know it. If I were an NFL player, I would live like a pauper until I had at least $4M in the bank.

Hammock Parties 05-27-2013 11:30 PM

I went through all 240-odd players I first saw on the FA list and determined who I was interested in.

NOW I GOTTA DO THAT 3X

cdcox 05-27-2013 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Branden Albert's Huge Balls (Post 9713534)
I went through all 240-odd players I first saw on the FA list and determined who I was interested in.

NOW I GOTTA DO THAT 3X

LMAO

I might try to do something about a top 100 list, based on snaps over the last 2 years. My time on this is really going to be crunched over the next month, so we'll see.

Hammock Parties 05-27-2013 11:38 PM

It only took me about an hour, so doing it again 3x isn't a big deal since we have several days.

I feel people should be rewarded for any work they do researching the FA list.

I'm guessing a lot of people will just try to snipe anyone someone is bidding on anyway.

cdcox 05-27-2013 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Branden Albert's Huge Balls (Post 9713541)
It only took me about an hour, so doing it again 3x isn't a big deal since we have several days.

I feel people should be rewarded for any work they do researching the FA list.

I'm guessing a lot of people will just try to snipe anyone someone is bidding on anyway.

You could sprinkle some rotten Easter eggs among your bids. Players that look good with respect to stats but have significant "Goodell issues" if you dig deeper. Maybe you'll end up enticing someone into giving a 5 year contract to the next Ray Curruth. How sweet would that be?

lostcause 05-28-2013 01:21 AM

I just went through the whole process and overall, I like it. It's simple and efficient. However, there has to be a mechanism that changes pricing dependent upon position. There is no reason why signing my punter long term costs as much as signing my qb or wr long term. Or full back or guard or center. In a sense, it penalizes people who invest a high draft pick in a top notch kick returner, but then can't rationalize keeping them around because it will mean costing the same as an elite lt to do so.

Hammock Parties 05-28-2013 05:00 AM

I have successfully combed the FA database and pruned it down to 63 players I have interest in. Come at me, sandboxers.

Also, WHERE THE HELL ARE MY PUNTERS, CDCOX? *snaps fingers*

rageeumr 05-28-2013 08:36 AM

I feel like I'm in a pretty good spot. I think I should end up having around $100 per hole that I REALLY need to fill in free agency. Hopefully that means I can get my pressing needs met and then make a few additional upgrades from there.

The $0 1-year contract is a lifesaver. It allows me to keep some brokedicks around and upgrade if I get the chance.

Rain Man 05-28-2013 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lostcause (Post 9713594)
I just went through the whole process and overall, I like it. It's simple and efficient. However, there has to be a mechanism that changes pricing dependent upon position. There is no reason why signing my punter long term costs as much as signing my qb or wr long term. Or full back or guard or center. In a sense, it penalizes people who invest a high draft pick in a top notch kick returner, but then can't rationalize keeping them around because it will mean costing the same as an elite lt to do so.

Interesting point. We'll think about that.

DJ's left nut 05-28-2013 09:56 AM

Additionally, I feel like there should be a 1 year limit on the rollover.

Otherwise it makes it awfully easy for a team to hoard its $$ for a couple of seasons and just blow the hell out of the salary scale.

Rain Man 05-28-2013 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9713895)
Additionally, I feel like there should be a 1 year limit on the rollover.

Otherwise it makes it awfully easy for a team to hoard its $$ for a couple of seasons and just blow the hell out of the salary scale.



Yeah, I'm kind of torn about having any rollover at all. Or perhaps there's a rollover tax of 50% or something. What do you think?

TambaBerry 05-28-2013 10:25 AM

It should be like the real NFL where the salary cap goes up a certain percentage every season to account for bigger contracts that will happen.

dj56dt58 05-28-2013 12:18 PM

How about a place to put notes? Would be nice for evaluating players ideas and game plans

Rain Man 05-28-2013 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dj56dt58 (Post 9714233)
How about a place to put notes? Would be nice for evaluating players ideas and game plans

That will go into the suggestion box. Thanks.

DJ's left nut 05-28-2013 12:37 PM

Others may have this problem too, but JR Sweezy is listed as a FA and he was drafted as Mr. Irrelevant.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.