That's like saying Hitler is done because there's no more V2's...

This. The Chiefs will have a promising rookie and competitive vet on the roster in 2013

They have no choice... to not draft one at #1 would invite an uproar that'd make the current chorus seem like nothing.

Just ****ing wait.

We will acquire a veteran that will win 5-8 games to calm the truefans down, and draft a mid-round QB to try and (fail) to calm down the intelligent fans.


T-Jax part 2 here we come!

There will be an "I'm leaving forever" movement in which no fanbase has ever seen.

doubt anyone jumps your shit for being a new guy.

They are going to jump your shit for making STUPID ****ING POSTS
Posted via Mobile Device

I will move on at that point. focus on KU sports and be done with the NFL.

Its getting closer and closer to that anyway. These last 4 years have driven alot of Chiefs fans away anyways...

I won't jump your shit for being the new guy. I just need to know what the **** you said before that last sentence.

I would, too. I have tried to think about what other team I could become a fan of, but it never quite works.

If the Texans were still average, I could cheer for them, but since they are good I would just be another band-wagon bundle of sticks.

While common sense may suggest that because Cassel is done we should draft a QB with our first pick, I don't think they are dependent on one another.

I honestly wouldn't be surprised if we pick someone up via trade or FA instead.

I hate to agree with Kietzman here but this organization hasn't given any indication now or in the past that they're willing to make an investment in a QB in the 1st round. The Chiefs seem to go against the common sense grain.

This post mentions that we'll finish with 3 or 4 wins. HOW THE **** IS THAT POSSIBLE?!!

Chirs Mortensen just answered a question about KC on SN

Rick (Kansas) asked:


Is there a light at the end of the tunnel for Chiefs fans at all?

Chris Mortensen (11:05 AM)


I believe there is.This team still has a good core base of talent. When a team underachieves, you second-guess a lot, including the coaches and the GM because it's clear that the Chiefs do not have a dynamic quarterback in Matt Cassel. I will say that Cassel is an outstanding young man, a great teammate, does have some skills but it not up to the standard. That being said, I believe the Chiefs have a foundation on which to build and be successful and sooner than later.

:spock: ehh o.k.

Great, now the national idiots think we are decent because we almost beat a Leftwich lead Steeler team.


:facepalm:

He was referring to the **** you cakes from the previous sentence, implying that Haley will be the head coach in SD an make those **** you KC cakes all year. It was a great first post filled with good points and solid grammar.

Why is Matt Cassel the only shitty QB in the history of the NFL where national media guys feel like they have to apologize before they rip into him? Jesus Christ. Nobody ever ****ing says, "Look, Tarvaris Jackson is a warm, funny guy who I'd love to have a beer with, but I don't know if he can lead the Vikings to the Super Bowl" or "Rex Grossman has a beautiful soul and his wife really makes the best key lime pie you'll ever have, but I don't think he's the answer at QB." They just say, "These guys aren't good QBs." Period. End of discussion.

What the **** is it about ****ing Matt Cassel? Does Belichick own dirty pictures of all sports media personnel, and he makes them all say nice things about his former players? Is it his dreamy eyes? His boyish smile? What is it?

Good God, Mort. Just say "The Chiefs have good players, but Matt Cassel is a bad QB." You're not being vulgar. You're not even saying "sucks." You're just telling the truth about a really ****ing shitty player who doesn't belong in the NFL.