Star Trek 12 Gets Release Date
 

I'm not sure if its Star Trek 12 or Star Trek 2, but the release date is June 29, 2012.

http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2010/01/11...-nothing-else/

UPDATE: Paramount has confirmed to MTV that the projected release date for the "Star Trek" sequel is indeed June 29, 2012.

This counts as news, but there's not much to it. We all know there's a "Star Trek" sequel coming. Hell, Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci, writers/producers of the May reboot, were talking about sequel possibilities as far back as the week after the first movie came out. Now we have a date to pin our hopes to: June 29, 2012.

Nothing else is known or announced, so don't ask. Maybe director J.J. Abrams will return to helm the sequel, maybe he won't. Maybe Khan will be the villain, maybe not. For all we know, the plan is to give us an epic "Star Trek Meets Star Wars" crossover. Could happen, right?

The news comes from a variety of sources, including Ain't It Cool News and Box Office Mojo, but there's no Paramount-issued press release that I can find. The information ran through some trustworthy sources, but we've yet to receive comment from the studio directly.

Regardless, there really hasn't ever been any doubt that we'd be seeing more "Star Trek." Abrams' take on the series made it friendly to an entirely new, much wider audience than its ever known before.

Were you anything less than certain that a "Star Trek" sequel was coming eventually? Where would you like the story to go from where it is now? Any specific hopes for the sequel?

Awesome. A good six months before the world is ripped asunder. That means I'll have time to pick up the DVD and watch it a few times on my own time.

What was it that got Kahn stranded on city alpha 5? Genetic manipulation and attempted takeover of kirk's ship, correct? If so the takeover of the enterprise by Kahn wouldn't seem to me to be big enough story for the next Star Trek. They would have to fill it out some.

I just don't see a Star Wars/Star Trek story line. Way too much hollywood political baggage connected to that idea.

Three ****ing years between movies. Douchebags. 4321

Gives u plenty of time to re-watch Avatar again and again.

Just means they get it right instead of rushing through it for a quick cash grab.

I would x10 rather them take their time and do it right instead of giving us another Star Trek: Nemesis.

The only thing that could have possibly been worse would have been if they had started a Voyager movie franchise.

Even if it was r-rated with naked borg?

Even if it was X rated and 6of9 was getting dp'd by Kim and Tuvok whilst B'Elanna sat on her face.

If it means having to put up with Janeway for 2.5 hours I am out.

Say, did you know that she voices Flemeth in Dragon Age?

:evil:

(seriously)

Yup... made killing her that much more enjoyable.

It hasn't happened yet in this universe. They can pretty much do whatever they want with Kahn now. I would still prefer they left it alone though.

Yeah, because God knows Abrams couldn't produce a quality product quickly. It's not like he's produced a top TV show or anything.

:spock:

Yeah, they should leave Kahn alone and go with a full blown war with the Klingons

I'd like to see the Cardassians come into play.

[http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_AW8PsZE-L7...00/Trekkie.jpg]

The Cardassians were the most forthcoming with technology in the early days of the warp drive.

In the old history we were friendly with the Cardassians and eventually it breaks into war. With the reboot, we could go to war with them much sooner.

[/http://andrearaimondi.files.wordpres...03/trekkie.jpg]