ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Ouch: PFW Evaluates Geno, Barkley (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=271664)

ModSocks 04-01-2013 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 9546727)
I'd take Barkley over Smith as well. Been saying it all along. Smith scares me - I think he's a product of the system.

But hasn't he played in 3 different systems?

Sorter 04-01-2013 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 9546727)
I'd take Barkley over Smith as well. Been saying it all along. Smith scares me - I think he's a product of the system.

Please enlighten me as to why you think that. LMAO

Canofbier 04-01-2013 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ponderception (Post 9546734)
Please enlighten me as to why you think that. LMAO

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hE-YVPAWMj...TONE_CHART.jpg

HonestChieffan 04-01-2013 03:40 PM

On the positive side, he is a quarterback. Lets not get real negative. Keep it real simple and have some other guy do that leadership thing. Don't schedule too much film time and they guy could be right up there.

RealSNR 04-01-2013 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ponderception (Post 9546734)
Please enlighten me as to why you think that. LMAO

You've been such an asshole to people who disagree with you on Geno Smith, bro. Now there's some hell to pay, and Dane's going to be sure of that!

TEX 04-01-2013 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9546731)
But hasn't he played in 3 different systems?

Yes. Just something about him makes me very cautious. Maybe it's the failure in some big games - I don't know - because he has also played well in some. I think he has more upside than Barkley, BUT also more potential for failure. Barkley had it all two seasons ago and to me just seems more steady - less risk. The only thing I don't like about him is the injury.

MahiMike 04-01-2013 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyPhuD (Post 9546631)
Wait this means Geno might still be there for our second round pick right?????? PBJPBJPBJ

3rd?

Sorter 04-01-2013 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 9546761)
Yes. just something about him makes me very cautious. Maybe it's the failure in some big games - I don't know - because he has also played well in some. I think he has more upside than Barkley, BUT also more potential for failure. Barkley had is all two seasons ago and to me just seems more steady - less risk. The only thing I don't like about him is the injury.

Again, tell me how Geno is a "product of the system".

I would love to learn from your in depth knowledge of the lack of similarity of progressions, route designs/concepts, and blocking schemes from the AirRaid and the NFL.

*inb4 "well, they throw a lot of screens*

silver5liter 04-01-2013 03:46 PM

http://www.sbnation.com/nfl-mock-dra...nolan-nawrocki

Deberg_1990 04-01-2013 03:48 PM

Luke Joeckel approves this thread!

RealSNR 04-01-2013 04:03 PM

Also, outside of his shoulder this year, Barkley has no injury history. He's very sturdy.

Chiefaholic 04-01-2013 04:08 PM

Despite CP's opinion, I'd take Andy Reids opinion of Geno over any armchair QB. I WANT the Chiefs to draft Geno, more due to desperation for a QB than facts that prove him to be a legit franchise QB. If Andy sees Geno as a legit franchise QB, he'll draft him.

BryanBusby 04-01-2013 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante84 (Post 9546694)
This is the same guy who slammed Cam and RG3.

He also questioned Russel Wilson's commitment to football. Either this dude is racist, or literally reeruned.

R8RFAN 04-01-2013 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9546634)
ChiefsandO'sFan is masturbating furiously

Are you curled up in the fetal position yet?

Chiefspants 04-01-2013 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 9546761)
Yes. Just something about him makes me very cautious. Maybe it's the failure in some big games - I don't know - because he has also played well in some. I think he has more upside than Barkley, BUT also more potential for failure. Barkley had it all two seasons ago and to me just seems more steady - less risk. The only thing I don't like about him is the injury.

70-33


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.