22 percent of 3rd rounders turn into 5 year starters and that doesn't weed out the meh ones. That's why I always find it hilarious when people freak out over getting or giving away a 3rd.

What is the definition of "impact" wrt the article in the OP?

If Joeckel starts for this team for the next 10 years is that an "impact"?

Let's not confuse the idea that Joeckel is a bad pick for this team with the notion that he's a completely worthless player. The guy is pretty likely to be a successful NFL tackle.

The Chiefs suck.

Wrong.

Unbelievably wrong.

This explains a lot.

You know, he is annoying, like 12 year old boy.

But what the **** are you still doing here?

Your protein source was fired months ago.

Truth hurts. I hope we get out of this string of worthless seasons soon, I miss the 90's.

Yep. That was covered in one of the last chapters in the Lamar Hunt book I just finished. Not a pretty time for the Chiefs at all.

http://www.pro-football-reference.co.../kan/draft.htm

Go from 1975-1989 There are some years where there was practically no new contribution made to the team, some years 1-3 players that could be considered future help. Even in the '88 and '89 draft when Smith and DT were drafted the rest of the draft was crap. 1984 was good with Mass, Alt and Porter, but geez in these years the draft was 12-17 fricking rounds.

Mathy duh article is duh.

FYP.

You're learning the Twelve Degrees of Geno, penbook-style. Loflz...
Posted via Mobile Device

This.:clap:

Yeah, Spani, Maas, Hackett, Burress, Okoye, Alt, Cherry, Barbaro, Lewis, Ross, Stillman, Delaney, Paige, Carson and so on we're horrible acquisitions.