ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Cardinals Official 2017 STL Cardinals Thread (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=305574)

Pasta Little Brioni 03-28-2017 09:14 AM

Fire Dan and Al. Embarrassing a team like this has those clowns calling games. They should be across the state.

DJ's left nut 03-28-2017 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 12800982)
Fire Dan and Al. Embarrassing a team like this has those clowns calling games. They should be across the state.

They're all the same. You can't find a local crew that isn't all about inane babble and ball-washing.

But at least put Edmonds up there more often. That guy was entertaining as hell.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-28-2017 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12800985)
They're all the same. You can't find a local crew that isn't all about inane babble and ball-washing.

But at least put Edmonds up there more often. That guy was entertaining as hell.

I'd take anyone over those morons. Such amazing comeback win game ending calls like..."LOOK AT THAT BENCH!!"

DJ's left nut 03-28-2017 02:47 PM

These are hysterical...well, presuming you watched The Office.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Episode 1: &quot;The Interview&quot; <a href="https://t.co/18Esl7IJgr">pic.twitter.com/18Esl7IJgr</a></p>&mdash; Double Birds (@2xBirds) <a href="https://twitter.com/2xBirds/status/843996112155566081">March 21, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Episode 2: &quot;The Slump&quot; <a href="https://t.co/gAf1CuEIGM">pic.twitter.com/gAf1CuEIGM</a></p>&mdash; Double Birds (@2xBirds) <a href="https://twitter.com/2xBirds/status/844356906995105792">March 22, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Episode 3: &quot;The Investment&quot; <a href="https://t.co/7SJTw9sefA">pic.twitter.com/7SJTw9sefA</a></p>&mdash; Double Birds (@2xBirds) <a href="https://twitter.com/2xBirds/status/844713655480598534">March 23, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-video" data-lang="en"><p lang="et" dir="ltr">Episode 4: &quot;Team Chemistry&quot; <a href="https://t.co/8gMkmtX18w">pic.twitter.com/8gMkmtX18w</a></p>&mdash; Double Birds (@2xBirds) <a href="https://twitter.com/2xBirds/status/845078848098197504">March 24, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

raybec 4 03-28-2017 03:11 PM

Holy shit, those are hilarious. especially the Bankruptcy one, I was laughing too loud at work.....way too loud

DJ's left nut 03-28-2017 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 12801356)
Holy shit, those are hilarious. especially the Bankruptcy one, I was laughing too loud at work.....way too loud

People actually stopped by my office. I was crying.

"I. Declare.....BANKRUPTCY!!!!!"

Dying. Just dying.

VAChief 03-29-2017 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 12796321)
Heyward is also working on revamping his mechanics and battling with breaking old habits. It may or may not amount to much but then again you still have Piscotty at .466.

Piscotty is also struggling this spring, but at the league minimum. If he busts he costs virtually nothing. Heyward has been trending down for years. We are lucky the baby bears wanted him.

Marco Polo 03-30-2017 12:05 PM

What would we have to give up?

According to Jon Heyman of FanRag Sports, the Cardinals "have quietly showed interest" in White Sox starter Jose Quintana.
Heyman notes that the Astros and Pirates have been the perceived frontrunners for Quintana, but he calls their pursuits of the left-handed ace "passive" up to this point. In his report Heyman then labels the Cardinals a "sleeper team," with the "combination of young players and prospects to make it work." The asking price is undoubtedly sky-high for Quintana, who boasts a 3.35 ERA over the last four seasons and a team-friendly contract that runs through 2020. He is currently projected to serve as the Opening Day starter for the rebuilding White Sox.

Marco Polo 03-30-2017 12:06 PM

p.s. Flying to STL tomorrow for my ninth Opening Day in the last 10 years! Let's hope for good weather and a Cardinals victory on Sunday night.

DJ's left nut 03-30-2017 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marco Polo (Post 12803311)
p.s. Flying to STL tomorrow for my ninth Opening Day in the last 10 years! Let's hope for good weather and a Cardinals victory on Sunday night.

They can't trump what the Astros will be able/willing to offer, IMO.

It honestly wouldn't surprise me to see the 'stros eventually decide to part with Bregman if needed. They'd surely do everything in their power to avoid it, but if they're sitting there in July and feel they're a legit top of the rotation starter away from putting some distance between themselves and Texas, I think they'll pull the trigger. They have the prospect depth to take the hit.

At the very least they'd eventually give up Kyle Tucker and I can't see the Cardinals dabbling in that rich a pool. Unless Bader were to elevate his prospect status to at least within shouting distance of Tucker, I don't think they can pull it off. Even if Bader were to make that leap, the Astros would likely be able to include Martes with Tucker and where's that leave STL? Weaver and Bader doesn't get near that.

raybec 4 03-30-2017 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12803348)
They can't trump what the Astros will be able/willing to offer, IMO.

It honestly wouldn't surprise me to see the 'stros eventually decide to part with Bregman if needed. They'd surely do everything in their power to avoid it, but if they're sitting there in July and feel they're a legit top of the rotation starter away from putting some distance between themselves and Texas, I think they'll pull the trigger. They have the prospect depth to take the hit.

At the very least they'd eventually give up Kyle Tucker and I can't see the Cardinals dabbling in that rich a pool. Unless Bader were to elevate his prospect status to at least within shouting distance of Tucker, I don't think they can pull it off. Even if Bader were to make that leap, the Astros would likely be able to include Martes with Tucker and where's that leave STL? Weaver and Bader doesn't get near that.

Maybe the 'Stros have some information on their prospects in some type of database the Cards could get a look at. That would be really cool.

Miles 03-30-2017 08:41 PM

Looks like a Yadi extension just got done with details still coming out. I dot have much perspective on the amount but nice to see him extended.

Ken Rosenthal‏ @Ken_Rosenthal

Sources: Molina three-year extension with #STLCards will be between $55M and $65M.

VAChief 03-31-2017 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12803348)
They can't trump what the Astros will be able/willing to offer, IMO.

It honestly wouldn't surprise me to see the 'stros eventually decide to part with Bregman if needed. They'd surely do everything in their power to avoid it, but if they're sitting there in July and feel they're a legit top of the rotation starter away from putting some distance between themselves and Texas, I think they'll pull the trigger. They have the prospect depth to take the hit.

At the very least they'd eventually give up Kyle Tucker and I can't see the Cardinals dabbling in that rich a pool. Unless Bader were to elevate his prospect status to at least within shouting distance of Tucker, I don't think they can pull it off. Even if Bader were to make that leap, the Astros would likely be able to include Martes with Tucker and where's that leave STL? Weaver and Bader doesn't get near that.

I think I read that the WSox have inquired before about Kelly. It most likely would have to include him. Kelly, Bader, and Weaver would be our top three rated prospects (not necessarily how I would rate them). It could be enough.

DJ's left nut 03-31-2017 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VAChief (Post 12804862)
I think I read that the WSox have inquired before about Kelly. It most likely would have to include him. Kelly, Bader, and Weaver would be our top three rated prospects (not necessarily how I would rate them). It could be enough.

Steep price to still be worse than Chicago at every spot on the field...

VAChief 03-31-2017 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12804894)
Steep price to still be worse than Chicago at every spot on the field...

Definitely risky, but we don't have any real upside lefties anywhere on the horizon.

bdj23 03-31-2017 08:12 PM

https://youtu.be/zWmIb5kdz9s

In honor of our last glorious day.

(Baseball is finally here)

Pasta Little Brioni 03-31-2017 08:23 PM

Cool, the perfect cure for insomnia

ChiefsCountry 04-02-2017 01:05 PM

http://www.stltoday.com/sports/baseb...6844bfff2.html

20 million per year for Yadi. That's a tough one to know which way to go on that one.

Marcellus 04-02-2017 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12806489)
http://www.stltoday.com/sports/baseb...6844bfff2.html

20 million per year for Yadi. That's a tough one to know which way to go on that one.

Too much $ period. Seems like a reactionary deal to me. They didn't want to lose another HOF player to another team to end their career so they over paid.

bdj23 04-02-2017 06:20 PM

Our march to the World Series starts now.

Go Cards go

(I'm drunk btw)

O.city 04-02-2017 06:26 PM

Anyone else think that anthem was terrible

Jewish Rabbi 04-02-2017 06:26 PM

Chuck Berry certainly didn't pass any of his talent to his daughter.

O.city 04-02-2017 06:28 PM

Not starting Wong opening night. Starting the mind **** early I guess

HonestChieffan 04-02-2017 06:32 PM

Hope the Cubbies do damage tonight.

jd1020 04-02-2017 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12806806)
Anyone else think that anthem was terrible

Just everyone who heard it that's not related to the Berry family.

Prison Bitch 04-02-2017 07:13 PM

3/60 extension for a catcher with 14 years under his belt? Why?

O.city 04-02-2017 07:20 PM

Not going to be fun watching Peralta all season

jd1020 04-02-2017 07:28 PM

I hope this Schwarber in leadoff experiment doesn't last long.

Please just put Zobrist there and let everyone else drive him in. Asking the pitcher and Baez to get on base for him is like forfeiting 30 RBIs.

Swanman 04-02-2017 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12806811)
Not starting Wong opening night. Starting the mind **** early I guess

I would have better at bats against Lester than he would. He should never, ever, ever, ever start against lefties, especially ace lefties.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Swanman 04-02-2017 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 12806895)
I hope this Schwarber in leadoff experiment doesn't last long.

Please just put Zobrist there and let everyone else drive him in. Asking the pitcher and Baez to get on base for him is like forfeiting 30 RBIs.

Maddon can't manage without getting cute and acting like he is smarter than the game. Great manager overall but does stupid shit at times

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Jewish Rabbi 04-02-2017 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 12806895)
I hope this Schwarber in leadoff experiment doesn't last long.

Please just put Zobrist there and let everyone else drive him in. Asking the pitcher and Baez to get on base for him is like forfeiting 30 RBIs.

I don't understand tonight's lineup at all for the Cubs.

jd1020 04-02-2017 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi (Post 12806914)
I don't understand tonight's lineup at all for the Cubs.

I can understand it from the perspective of Schwarbers batters eye, but they have no one in the lineup to put in the 9th spot that makes consistent contact and gets on base other than Zobrist but you aren't going to bat him 9th.

Maddon was brain dead in the WS with Zobrist hitting clean up in Chicago and it took a miracle and a stupid ass All-Star rule to get RBI hitters in RBI spots to start scoring runs. Luckily he still had Fowler to save his ass in the leadoff spot but now he's gone and Zobrist is the only one that can fill that role but he's a power hitter now, apparently.

bdj23 04-02-2017 08:25 PM

C-mart dealing

kcpasco 04-02-2017 08:53 PM

Watching Heyward continue to suck ass makes me smile. That's s bad player on a good team.

jd1020 04-02-2017 09:15 PM

Wonder why the Cubs didn't challenge Fowlers slide. Slid through the bag and ended up 3 feet passed it while kicking his legs way out of the base path to make contact with Russell. Cheap way to get a double play but that's about as clear cut as it gets.

KChiefs1 04-02-2017 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BDj23 (Post 12806952)
C-mart dealing



Matheny kept him in too long though.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

kcpasco 04-02-2017 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 12807045)
Matheny kept him in too long though.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Martinez was fine starting the 8th. Oh needs to not shit the bed.

jd1020 04-02-2017 09:31 PM

God I wish Rizzo was thinking bunt on the first pitch.

That was a free run with that defense. 3rd baseman was playing at shortstop.

bdj23 04-02-2017 09:31 PM

Got away from that one.

bdj23 04-02-2017 09:38 PM

There you go, grichuk

jd1020 04-02-2017 09:39 PM

Fastballs to a guy that can't hit a slider with a guy that has a very good slider.

Whatever. Way to many walks from the pitchers today and a stupid lineup from Maddon just to get all the players from the world series on the field.

bdj23 04-02-2017 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 12807066)
Fastballs to a guy that can't hit a slider with a guy that has a very good slider.

Whatever. Way to many walks from the pitchers today and a stupid lineup from Maddon just to get all the players from the world series on the field.

Feel free to **** off

kcpasco 04-02-2017 09:52 PM

Nice brain fart Marp

Chiefspants 04-02-2017 09:53 PM

You could almost feel that one coming.

jd1020 04-02-2017 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BDj23 (Post 12807073)
Feel free to **** off

Oh first?

tk13 04-02-2017 09:54 PM

That didn't work.

kcpasco 04-02-2017 09:54 PM

You wear the horns tonight Marp

jd1020 04-02-2017 10:05 PM

That IBB rule just seems awkward.

raybec 4 04-02-2017 10:05 PM

Carp blew it but why is Mike trying to get 6 outs from Oh in the opener? That's just stupid. Use the pen, tomorrow's an off dsy.

raybec 4 04-02-2017 10:07 PM

Way too close to take with a 9th inning tie Piscotty

raybec 4 04-02-2017 10:10 PM

Shitty defense was a real problem last year, it's opening day and it's already a problem again

raybec 4 04-02-2017 10:12 PM

Kid Randall

bdj23 04-02-2017 10:12 PM

Ayyyy

raybec 4 04-02-2017 10:12 PM

Martinez was nails tonight

jd1020 04-02-2017 10:13 PM

Another walk to set up the game winning hit.

kcpasco 04-02-2017 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 12807108)
That IBB rule just seems awkward.

I agree, I don't like it at all.

Frazod 04-02-2017 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 12807119)
Martinez was nails tonight

Glad he was. Jesus, could they have possibly stranded any more ****ing runners? That was uglier than a bulldog's asshole. :banghead:

jd1020 04-02-2017 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 12807122)
I agree, I don't like it at all.

I don't see why they couldn't just implement what video games have been doing for a long time now... 1 pitch with the catcher signaling for a walk. At least then you would still get the feeling of an at bat.

DJ's left nut 04-02-2017 10:37 PM

That last AB demonstrates why Grichuk can't bat 8th. Hell, his HR did as well.

In the 8th, Oh had already been doubled switched into the cleanup spot (because Matheny is reeruned). But the unintentional consequence of that was to ensure that there's someone that can actually swing a bat behind Grichuk. So what happened? He got the strike he needs to do damage.

In the 9th with the bases loaded and nowhere to put him, of course he was going to get at least one pitch to hit.

Randall Grichuk is just so damn dangerous when he gets a strike that one of the very first considerations for Mike Matheny when putting together a lineup should be "will this get Randall Grichuk at least 2 pitches to hit today?"

Because the guy has genuinely game-changing power. And if you bat him 8th, teams will pitch around him any chance they get. Why throw him a strike when the pitcher's behind him and he has a below average O-Strike rate? He's a guy that will chase pitches and if you put him in the 8 hole pitchers are all the more likely to throw slop up there to get him to get himself out. Worst case scenario is they walk him and the pitcher strands him.

It's ridiculous that Grichuk was batting 8 today. It's literally the single worst spot in the entire lineup for him, including leadoff.

kcpasco 04-02-2017 10:43 PM

I don't have any idea who should bat cleanup but I hope it's not Peralta all year.

O.city 04-03-2017 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpasco (Post 12807156)
I don't have any idea who should bat cleanup but I hope it's not Peralta all year.

As DJ mentioned above, the 8 hole ain't for Randal, I don't think the 4 spot is ether, but that's where I'd hit him. With the top 3 in the order currently as constructed, the cleanup guy is gonna have a **** ton of guys on base in front of him all year.

Put grichuk there.

Marcellus 04-03-2017 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12807335)
As DJ mentioned above, the 8 hole ain't for Randal, I don't think the 4 spot is ether, but that's where I'd hit him. With the top 3 in the order currently as constructed, the cleanup guy is gonna have a **** ton of guys on base in front of him all year.

Put grichuk there.

Why not Piscotty? I think he strikes out less.

He will end up there in the end unless he regresses.

O.city 04-03-2017 08:25 AM

I would imagine piscotty ends up there, and striking out kills, but I'd like to see grichuk hit as much as possible with guys in base

Marcellus 04-03-2017 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12807342)
I would imagine piscotty ends up there, and striking out kills, but I'd like to see grichuk hit as much as possible with guys in base

Piscotty hit .362 With RISP last year. Its a natural spot for him.

Marcellus 04-03-2017 08:41 AM

And right on cue the Cards sign Piscotty to an extension.

raybec 4 04-03-2017 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 12807352)
Piscotty hit .362 With RISP last year. Its a natural spot for him.

Piscotty hit for shit all Spring, I don't like Matheny's managerial idiocy but my hope is if he starts hitting they move him up in the lineup. It should be Piscotty/Grichuk in either order in the 4/5 spots.

Marcellus 04-03-2017 09:51 AM

6 years $33.5MM for Piscotty. Not bad really.

Swanman 04-03-2017 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 12807433)
6 years $33.5MM for Piscotty. Not bad really.

It's a good deal if he produces and not a ton of money if he doesn't. He definitely seems to have a much better mental makeup than Wong (not a high bar to be sure) so hopefully he can work out the kinks in his hitting soon. I don't know how many years we bought out of his cheap years, but on the face the contract doesn't look awful.

DJ's left nut 04-03-2017 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 12807433)
6 years $33.5MM for Piscotty. Not bad really.

I was hoping for something more along the lines of what Polanco and Herrera signed - 5 years guaranteed with team options for 2 more, giving you 2 FA years in exchange for the guaranteed money.

That said, 6/33.5 is cheap enough that it's fine. Herrera's deal would be 7/$50 and Polanco's deal 7/$60 if both options were picked up. So Piscotty's deal has a little less team upside baked into it than Herrera's but is actually cheaper than Herrera's deal is through the first 6 (Herrera's would be 6/$41). Then again it should be as Herrera's giving up a 2nd year of FA with that 6th year.

Polanco's deal, OTOH, is quite a bit more expensive than Piscotty's. Polanco's is 6/$47.5 if the 7th year wasn't picked up. So Polanco, in exchange for that team option he gave the Pirates in year 7, is getting almost $15 million more than Piscotty in the first 6 years. And Polanco had the same service time when he signed his deal that Piscotty has now.

O.city 04-03-2017 10:34 AM

Huh, well that locks a lot of guys up thru 2020. Now they just need to find a long term 3rd baseman that can settle right into the heart of the lineup for the next 8 years.

Hum, tough find

DJ's left nut 04-03-2017 10:46 AM

Looks like they got the option for the 7th year afterall:

http://www.stltoday.com/sports/baseb...ign=user-share

So in essence, they pay a fair amount less than Polanco got through the first 6 years by guaranteeing the 6th (whereas Polanco's is a team option that will almost certainly be picked up). The 7th year is a bigger number than Polanco's 7th but is more than offset by the cost savings in the first 6. And since it's an option, the Cards could walk away from it.

So if you think that Polanco's likely a better player than Piscotty, that makes sense. But if you think they'll be roughly equally valuable (though in different ways), then Piscotty's deal is much more team friendly.

The question is which Piscotty is the real one - if it's the first half of 2016's Piscotty, the Cardinals just got a great deal. If it's the latter half, they have another Wong contract on their hands.

It's a solid gamble.

raybec 4 04-03-2017 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12807489)
Looks like they got the option for the 7th year afterall:

http://www.stltoday.com/sports/baseb...ign=user-share

So in essence, they pay a fair amount less than Polanco got through the first 6 years by guaranteeing the 6th (whereas Polanco's is a team option that will almost certainly be picked up). The 7th year is a bigger number than Polanco's 7th but is more than offset by the cost savings in the first 6. And since it's an option, the Cards could walk away from it.

So if you think that Polanco's likely a better player than Piscotty, that makes sense. But if you think they'll be roughly equally valuable (though in different ways), then Piscotty's deal is much more team friendly.

The question is which Piscotty is the real one - if it's the first half of 2016's Piscotty, the Cardinals just got a great deal. If it's the latter half, they have another Wong contract on their hands.

It's a solid gamble.

I don't see Piscotty having a Wong like dropoff. I keep hearing he's trying to change the launch angle of his swing, which IMO is stupid and unneccisary, but who knows. I really have very little confidence in John Mabry. I don't know how a guy who was a career .263 hitter with less than 100 career dingers is a hitting coach but what do I know.

jd1020 04-03-2017 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 12807750)
I don't see Piscotty having a Wong like dropoff. I keep hearing he's trying to change the launch angle of his swing, which IMO is stupid and unneccisary, but who knows. I really have very little confidence in John Mabry. I don't know how a guy who was a career .263 hitter with less than 100 career dingers is a hitting coach but what do I know.

http://chicagocubsonline.com/wp-cont...llee082315.jpg

Meet John Mallee, currently the hitting coach of the Chicago Cubs. You may recognize him from his days on the Phillies minor league teams where he hit .208 over his 2 year career while never making it to MLB.

raybec 4 04-03-2017 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 12807853)
http://chicagocubsonline.com/wp-cont...llee082315.jpg

Meet John Mallee, currently the hitting coach of the Chicago Cubs. You may recognize him from his days on the Phillies minor league teams where he hit .208 over his 2 year career while never making it to MLB.

Is this the guy "retooling " Heyward? Because he looked lost last night.

jd1020 04-03-2017 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 12807896)
Is this the guy "retooling " Heyward? Because he looked lost last night.

He looked about as I expected. If anything is going to click with Heyward and get comfortable with his new stance it won't be for a couple months. I still don't like how much and how fast he bounces when the pitch is getting ready to be thrown and he still looks like he's getting loaded up way too late.

When the tweets were coming out on Heywards adjustments with his stance he looked way more fluid and rythmic. Only time will tell if he can dump the old habits.

His first AB last night was awful, but I thought his next 2 weren't horrible. The result was weak contact but at least he showed patience and a good eye.

O.city 04-03-2017 03:04 PM

Looks like the same jason heyward we've seen the last 2 or 3 years, imo.

Marcellus 04-03-2017 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12807938)
Looks like the same jason heyward we've seen the last 2 or 3 years, imo.

He should be batting in the 9 hole.

jd1020 04-03-2017 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12807938)
Looks like the same jason heyward we've seen the last 2 or 3 years, imo.

I don't get how you can say this.

He's holding the bat lower which is closer to the point where he starts his swing, his feet are more in line, he's not wrapping the bat around his shoulder, and he's not awkwardly twisting his hand forward around the handle.

The only thing that looks the same is the bounce.

He needs more work on his timing and I'd like to see him ditch the stupid bounce.

Marcellus 04-03-2017 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 12807981)
I don't get how you can say this.

He's holding the bat lower which is closer to the point where he starts his swing, his feet are more in line, he's not wrapping the bat around his shoulder, and he's not awkwardly twisting his hand forward around the handle.

The only thing that looks the same is the bounce.

He needs more work on his timing and I'd like to see him ditch the stupid bounce.

Just keep holding your breath, I am sure he can hit .230 this season given a few more months of working on it.

jd1020 04-03-2017 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 12808029)
Just keep holding your breath, I am sure he can hit .230 this season given a few more months of working on it.

And I'm sure if he doesn't it will matter just as much as last year.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.