ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Fantasy/CasinoPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   Is this trade lopsided? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=287108)

The Franchise 10-01-2014 09:43 PM

Is this trade lopsided?
 
Mark Ingram, Khiry Robinson, Golden Tate and Alfred Morris

for

Le'Veon Bell and Pierre Garçon?

Buck 10-01-2014 09:44 PM

Whoever gets Bell and Garcon wins.

The Franchise 10-01-2014 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 10969871)
Whoever gets Bell and Garcon wins.

Is it lopsided though? Like would you look at that and think collusion or any of that shit?

Buck 10-01-2014 09:54 PM

I wouldn't think collusion, but I would think the team giving up Bell and Garcon (2 starters) for 1 in Alfred Morris is stupid.

KCrockaholic 10-01-2014 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10969875)
Is it lopsided though? Like would you look at that and think collusion or any of that shit?

Nah, not really. Let it stand.

The Franchise 10-01-2014 09:56 PM

Ingram was a top 10 back before he got hurt. He'll be back in a week.

The Franchise 10-01-2014 10:00 PM

I'm one of the teams in that trade. That's why I was asking.

Shaid 10-01-2014 10:08 PM

I always try for 2 for 1 trades to upgrade players. Getting 2 of them in a single trade is pretty nice. I agree that Bell and Garcon wins that trade. I don't know if it's veto-able though.

crazycoffey 10-02-2014 01:24 AM

Tate has outscored garcion two of the last four weeks and week one they were about the same. He has a better QB situation and with megatron getting all the coverage attention, in a PPR league he's going to continue to outscore garcion.

Giving up bell to get two (hopefully) consistent RBs and a handcuff is the real gamble. Plus with Todd hailey as an OC and a drug history, who knows. It's not that lopsided and in 4 weeks either side could look like a genius

crazycoffey 10-02-2014 02:03 AM

Trade analyzer

Old Dog 10-02-2014 07:29 AM

Getting Bell and Garcon would be the better end of that IMO.
As far as vetoing it, IMHO the ONLY reason to veto one is collusion.

sedated 10-02-2014 08:33 AM

I'd always get a starter/star over multiple players, unless I'm desperate to fill multiple spots in my lineup.

East Side Rogelio 10-02-2014 09:00 AM

I'm in the minority and while if I had Bell I would shop him for someone a little better than Morris I still prefer the team getting Morris, Tate and Ingram.

Khiry is a non-factor other than a handcuff he can be removed it's essentially 3 for 2. Bell was 1 of only 4 top 20 rushers last year with a ypc average of less then 4 yards per game. He's not a great runner doesn't have great speed or strength between tackles. I've already noticed his game start to revert pack to a tier 2 RB. He's the ultimate sell high right now.

Puling the trigger on a trade most of times depends on team needs. If you don't have a great #2 rb then Ingram and Morris will fill in nicely. Tate has easily surpassed his pre-season expectations and it's time to re-adjust his value. He will match Garcon's production and maybe end up the better fantasy receiver.

The Franchise 10-02-2014 09:46 AM

The one downside to making that trade was that it absolutely killed my RB depth that I had built up.

Went from: Lacy, Stacy, Morris, Ingram, Robinson, McKinnon and Davis

Now: Lacy, Bell, Stacy, McKinnon and Davis

crazycoffey 10-03-2014 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10970372)
The one downside to making that trade was that it absolutely killed my RB depth that I had built up.

Went from: Lacy, Stacy, Morris, Ingram, Robinson, McKinnon and Davis

Now: Lacy, Bell, Stacy, McKinnon and Davis

You had too many


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.