Better pick: Toby Gerhardt or McCluster?
Ok so Gerhardt went with the #51 (we took Arenas with #50).
We took McCkuster with #36. So which is a better pick? Which back do you see as contributing more to the NFL? I realize that they are different kinds of backs, so this is a difficult comparison...heck Gerhardt might even end up playing a lot of FB... To me that makes the question more interesting! (Poll Coming soon) |
Jesus ****!? Why would we want Gerhardt? McCluster was a far better choice.
|
McCluster by a landslide.
|
Gerhart is a FB, McCluster is a WR. Which one is more important you dumb shit?
|
Quote:
That makes YOU the dumb shit... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
FB's shouldn't be drafted in the second round.
|
Apples and Oranges...
|
another guy wanting his own thread on the front page
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I didn't say which will be a better RB. You have to be reeruned...no one could possibly be as stupid as you are without some kind of brain damage... You are a SUPER reerun! Powers so beyond extraordinary dumb that it boggles the ****ign mind. http://piratevitamins.files.wordpres...er-reerun3.jpg |
Quote:
Jesus the incompetence here is mind numbing.. I suppose you wouldnt go out on a limb and say that Dallas Clark was a better pick than Michael Haynes? Jesus. |
McCluster is a definite need... a slot receiver that can also return kicks and work out of the backfield if needed. Toby is strictly a big back and we already have two good RB's in Charles/Jones.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.