ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Electronics iPhone 7. No headphone jack. (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=302024)

DaFace 09-07-2016 07:47 PM

iPhone 7. No headphone jack.
 
More info here.

http://www.theverge.com/2016/9/7/127...e-release-date

Discuss.

SAUTO 09-07-2016 07:56 PM

They say all phones are gonna lose them next model

Dayze 09-07-2016 08:31 PM

Now Introducing The New iBuds for only $99.99

Urc Burry 09-07-2016 08:52 PM

Its annoying that we won't be able to use it as an auxiliary and charge it at the same time. Or that's what I'm assuming. My car right now doesn't have Bluetooth, but I should be upgrading this fall and that should solve that.

KCTitus 09-07-2016 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 12409846)
Now Introducing The New iBuds for only $99.99

Try 169...lol

DaveNull 09-07-2016 09:05 PM

Meh. The adapter dingus is small, can just live on the end of my headphones, and is free with the phone. seems like a reasonable compromise for the thing to be waterproof.

We'll see long term though. We are talking about what's perhaps the single most universal electrical interface in the world. Even power plugs vary by region.

BigBeauford 09-07-2016 09:32 PM

This seems more anti-consumer than anything. Interfacing your headphones wirelessly gives the companies more control. So instead of analog to listen to whatever music you happen to have, DRM can dictate whether to send the signal to the earphones or not. I see no upside to this, and phones have been waterproofed before and could still have a headphone jack.

Buck 09-07-2016 09:32 PM

I doubt this is the death of the iPhone, but I won't buy another one until they put the headphone jack back in. Over 75% of my iPhone use is that headphone jack.

BigRedChief 09-07-2016 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveNull (Post 12409920)
Meh. The adapter dingus is small, can just live on the end of my headphones, and is free with the phone. seems like a reasonable compromise for the thing to be waterproof.

We'll see long term though. We are talking about what's perhaps the single most universal electrical interface in the world. Even power plugs vary by region.

The other thing that is concerning is Apple trying to move more of our tech to their solely owned proprietary W1 instead of what has become the norm, bluetooth.

DaveNull 09-07-2016 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 12410004)
I doubt this is the death of the iPhone, but I won't buy another one until they put the headphone jack back in. Over 75% of my iPhone use is that headphone jack.

You're that pissed that your headphone cable is now going to be two inches longer via a free adapter?

The Rick 09-07-2016 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 12410010)
The other thing that is concerning is Apple trying to move more of our tech to their solely owned proprietary W1 instead of what has become the norm, bluetooth.

My understanding is that it's still bluetooth and they will work with anything...

Miles 09-07-2016 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveNull (Post 12410020)
You're that pissed that your headphone cable is now going to be two inches longer via a free adapter?

It's an annoying drawback and Samsung makes a water resistant phone with the jack. Stuff like not being able to charge and use headphones at the same time while also trying not to lose lose the adaptor. I use multiple pairs of headphones I keep in various places which is also not ideal with an adaptor.

Silock 09-08-2016 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigBeauford (Post 12410002)
This seems more anti-consumer than anything. Interfacing your headphones wirelessly gives the companies more control. So instead of analog to listen to whatever music you happen to have, DRM can dictate whether to send the signal to the earphones or not. I see no upside to this, and phones have been waterproofed before and could still have a headphone jack.

Bluetooth hasn't had this issue. I don't see the problem coming that you're talking about.

Silock 09-08-2016 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urc Burry (Post 12409890)
Its annoying that we won't be able to use it as an auxiliary and charge it at the same time. Or that's what I'm assuming. My car right now doesn't have Bluetooth, but I should be upgrading this fall and that should solve that.

I use a Bluetooth radio adapter in my cars that don't have it. Works brilliantly.

thabear04 09-08-2016 12:34 AM

Did they make the charger cord thicker.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.