Not to worry. He didn't.

IDK how the rules work. I know they can talk to each other but Im not sure if he can.

I expect him to be there April 1. No reason to holdout now..

If he is throwing routes to Bowe be prepared for Geno to be ours..

.

I'm against trading back for two reasons:

1) There's no way we get a haul of picks in this draft to justify it because there doesn't exist any true generational talent for anyone to jump at. The fact that they would attempt to package Albert gives testimony to this fact.

2) The QB position in KC has gone from "atrocious" to "questionable" at best, and niether of those options scream "building a championship team for the future"(!). Both Geno and Matt are PERFECT developmental guys with true upside that can and would bose well for the future of the Chiefs, and I see slim pickings in immediate future drafts for the QB position. The time is without question...now.
Posted via Mobile Device

i don't deny that there is not much in the top of this draft worth trading up for, however is that not more of a red flag as to whom to draft as well? it should be worry some that no one would want to trade up for a potential franchise qb. I think you throw the draft trade chart right out the window, and if you can get a second round pick and slide back a few spots, or hell half way down the draft, then you do it. there might not be elite players early, but there are very very good starters avail in the mid of round one, and the possibility to land ej manuel or barkley or one of the other qb's in round two, perhaps you do so.

ProFootballCentral just said that the Chiefs interest in Geno is real and not a smokescreen.

BTW they were credited on NFL Network. They I guess are a legit source now.

The loss of the second round pick sucks, but the overactive FA signings the Chiefs accomplished have, imo, offset it already. Yeah, adding the best LB or Corner prospect wouldn't hurt, but those type of picks look good on the upcoming horizon.
Posted via Mobile Device

If we don't take Geno I'm staying away from this place for a while. The butthurt will be unbearable.

PFC is not a legit source of news. They are a hack site.

Same here!!

Then how come NFL Network credits them.

Really most rate him as a top 10 player, because I've looked at a number of big boards and the highest I saw him ranked was 9, with most having him in the 25th best player range and Kiper having him as a second rounder.

It's spamtastic!

PFC = full of hacks, NFLN cites PFC. By the transitive property, the NFLN is full of hacks.

For real, though, I hope they're right this time.

This. Please for the love of god, let this be true.