ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Science US Navy launches X-47B drone from aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=273087)

ChiefRocka 05-15-2013 01:25 PM

I worked on this baby for a year. Took wayyyyy to long to get to this point.

Donger 05-15-2013 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9684608)
I hope one of these doesn't land in hostile territory. We would have just given our stealth techonology away.......

That's already happened with the Sentinel that "landed" in Iran.

Sorter 05-15-2013 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRocka (Post 9684617)
I worked on this baby for a year. Took wayyyyy to long to get to this point.

That's ****ing crazy

Donger 05-15-2013 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRocka (Post 9684617)
I worked on this baby for a year. Took wayyyyy to long to get to this point.

You work at Pax?

mikey23545 05-15-2013 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 9684576)
Sure, for 10 or 20 years, then the Chinese have it, then 10+ years after that everyone has it.

Obviously we need to maintain our military superiority, but this isn't some magic bullet that will make us an invincible military superpower. WE ALREADY ARE, at least insofar as conventional warfare is concerned.

But we're already aware of the limitations of military superiority... It doesn't stop terrorists. It doesn't let us reshape the world in our image. etc. ad infinitum.

So who claimed any of that?

Barret 05-15-2013 01:39 PM

Question, Have they tested landing on an Aircraft Carrier as of yet? Launching I think would be easy, it is the landing part that is a lot more difficult, even for Human pilots.

Donger 05-15-2013 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barret (Post 9684646)
Question, Have they tested landing on an Aircraft Carrier as of yet? Launching I think would be easy, it is the landing part that is a lot more difficult, even for Human pilots.

No. They've practiced non-carrier trap landings at Patuxent though.

<object id="flashObj" width="486" height="440" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1&isUI=1" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=2360315130001&linkBaseURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.military.com%2Fvideo%2Fmilitary-aircraft-operations%2Flanding%2Fx-47b-shore-bases-arrested-landing%2F2360315130001%2F&playerID=791346831001&playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAEgPl55E~,U85ckMrT9QAbqFBf7jaKBoK Cwq74RQ0V&domain=embed&dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1&isUI=1" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=2360315130001&linkBaseURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.military.com%2Fvideo%2Fmilitary-aircraft-operations%2Flanding%2Fx-47b-shore-bases-arrested-landing%2F2360315130001%2F&playerID=791346831001&playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAEgPl55E~,U85ckMrT9QAbqFBf7jaKBoK Cwq74RQ0V&domain=embed&dynamicStreaming=true" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="440" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object>

HemiEd 05-15-2013 01:47 PM

Hard to duplicate the rolling and pitching of a carrier deck, but with the current technology I doubt it is too big of an issue.

listopencil 05-15-2013 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jiveturkey (Post 9684541)
Got it.

The folded position is used for storage and transport.

crossbow 05-15-2013 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trivers (Post 9684496)
Excellent use of those dollars.

Now if we can get drones with lasers (last month's new military advance), no one will consider going head to head with the USA. Suicide.

Never forget what happened to the western Roman Empire.

Or sharks with lasers on their heads would be better.

ChiefaRoo 05-15-2013 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 9684576)
Sure, for 10 or 20 years, then the Chinese have it, then 10+ years after that everyone has it.

Obviously we need to maintain our military superiority, but this isn't some magic bullet that will make us an invincible military superpower. WE ALREADY ARE, at least insofar as conventional warfare is concerned.

But we're already aware of the limitations of military superiority... It doesn't stop terrorists. It doesn't let us reshape the world in our image. etc. ad infinitum.

I don't get all this Chinese Military Technology syndrome. Listen, there are a lot of Chinese people but their culture and thought process is all monkey see monkey do. They haven't invented a radical new technology since gun powder.

All those photos of parked gee whiz equipment their Govt. spits out doesn't prove anything.

You guys forget about the Russians who have proven themselves to be much more ingenious from a technological innovation standpoint. They are as much or more of a concern than the Chinese.

Dave Lane 05-15-2013 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey23545 (Post 9684548)
I can just imagine our fighter pilots fighting from inside what looks like a flight simulator, flying drones in combat and simply dominating the skies...

Why bother? Have the computer run everything with the "pilots" standing by until its time to release the warbird.

Kylo Ren 05-15-2013 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 9684578)
I wonder if that guy is called the LSO now, or something similar? In the video, the flight deck sailer directing the movement of the plane positioning for the catapult, just like we always did, was looking where the fuselage canopy would be, with a pilot behind it.

An LSO is a landing signal officer. Those guys, obviously, do more than land the aircraft. I think they are considered "pilots". "...the flight deck sailor directing the movement of the plane..." is simply called a Director. I was one back in '88 - '89.

Donger 05-21-2013 10:35 AM

First touch and go:

[IMG]<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/sIWVs8xtiv8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>[/IMG]

Spicy McHaggis 05-21-2013 10:45 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3D7Y_ycSms


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.