LMAO

not going to answer the question?

Is this relevant news?

Now, now sugar drops. No need to get all riled up.

It was a stupid question.

I'd tell you that was filter evasion and a bannable offense.

No seriously. How do you know what kind of a job they did? Their job is to evaluate players and pass that info on to someone else to make the drafting decision. Who was drafted isn't necessarily a reflection of the scouts.

Therefore your question is irrelevant.

they were fired for their excellence?

we're 2-14, with the #1 pick in the draft, and a draft history so embarrassing it makes Matt Millen look sane

but you think it would be worse if someone else were responsible, I'd like to know how that is possible...it's a simple question (with a simple answer..."it's not")

Who selected the players? Was it the scouts or *****?

Regardless of whom you believe to be responsible, I'm not going to debate how great you and others on this board think they are at evaluating football players.

So these guys were Pioli hires? Dorsey probably just wants his own guys. Maybe.

He could hire you and a few of your fellow ****** who think they know more than NFL GM's. Then and only then we could say, "How could we be any worse?"

That's kinda interesting. Was there predictions totally off on the prospects? Then again, how can we know yet?

Imagine being the poor schmoe assigned to find the kid we want from MU. Doom

What it boils down to is Dorsey wants his own guys who know the system he wants to put in place. Dorsey's draft is over and it doesn't make sense to keep scouts around from the previous regime.