ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Movies and TV The Amazing Spider Man trailer (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=247350)

Deberg_1990 07-20-2011 12:02 PM

The Amazing Spider Man trailer
 
<div><object width="576" height="324"><param name="movie" value="http://d.yimg.com/nl/movies/site/player.swf"></param><param name="flashVars" value="vid=25992349&shareUrl=http%3A//movies.yahoo.com/movie/1810165200/video/25992349&"></param><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed width="576" height="324" allowFullScreen="true" src="http://d.yimg.com/nl/movies/site/player.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashvars="vid=25992349&shareUrl=http%3A//movies.yahoo.com/movie/1810165200/video/25992349&"></embed></object></div>

MoreLemonPledge 07-20-2011 12:16 PM

The A-meh-zing SpiderMan.

JD10367 07-20-2011 12:41 PM

That looks spectacularly bad. I didn't think anyone could actually make me MISS Tobey Maguire. What a turd that film's gonna be.

Bump 07-20-2011 12:41 PM

ya........this has already been done recently........

Barret 07-20-2011 12:56 PM

I liked the POV part at the end. I guess that would be even better in 3D.

But.....Can someone that has more information on Comics comment about the Father and Mother scene shown? I don't remember any information in any spiderman that eluded to his real parents.

Wouldn't that take away from the dynamic that is Uncle Ben and Peter's relationship? When he sees his "parent" die in Uncle Ben is when he decides "with great power comes great responsibility" and decides to take on the superhero image. That has ALWAYS been the story unless I missed something in the comics.

Deberg_1990 07-20-2011 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD10367 (Post 7759119)
That looks spectacularly bad. I didn't think anyone could actually make me MISS Tobey Maguire. What a turd that film's gonna be.

1. Not a fan of another Origin story less than 10 years after the original, been there done that...

2. It looks like postmodern/Emo dark and brooding crap.... doesnt fit the tone of Spider Man

JD10367 07-20-2011 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 7759193)
1. Not a fan of another Origin story less than 10 years after the original, been there done that...

2. It looks like postmodern/Emo dark and brooding crap.... doesnt fit the tone of Spider Man

3. It just looks like a badly done film, with crap CG and a protagonist who looks even less likeable than the last version of Spiderman.

I really hope it bombs spectacularly, just to teach them a lesson. There's just no reason for this movie, aside from the fact that they wrongly think they can make a shitload of money with it.

listopencil 07-20-2011 01:05 PM

Meanwhile, several movie executives are hard at work already rebooting this movie.

Bump 07-20-2011 01:05 PM

why don't they just redo the Transformers movie's? Once Christopher Nolan is finished with Batman, that needs to be his next project.

SuperChief 07-20-2011 01:18 PM

Why? Just . . . why? IMO, this is like the Hulk remake with Edward Norton - no ****ing point.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-20-2011 01:27 PM

I don't know what's epically gayer. Tobey as Spider-Man or this guy.

the Talking Can 07-20-2011 01:29 PM

i'll wait for the remake...

the Talking Can 07-20-2011 01:29 PM

and i don't remember spider man being a member of Weezer....

Thig Lyfe 07-20-2011 01:30 PM

Shoulda gone with Donald Glover.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-20-2011 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7759313)
and i don't remember spider man being a member of Weezer....

lol nice

Bump 07-20-2011 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla Thunder (Post 7759301)
I don't know what's epically gayer. Tobey as Spider-Man or this guy.

Tobey kicked ass as Spiderman

Deberg_1990 07-20-2011 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperChief (Post 7759265)
IMO, this is like the Hulk remake with Edward Norton - no ****ing point.

1. Ang Lee's version sucked, Marvel was smart to reboot it.
2. It wasnt an Origin story, Marvel was smart to avoid that.
3. They needed to tie it into the Avengers movie series and tone.

I think Sony still owns the Spider Man rights? I dont think this is a Marvel Studios production like the Avengers series. I could be wrong...

ModSocks 07-20-2011 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 7759193)
2. It looks like postmodern/Emo dark and brooding crap.... doesnt fit the tone of Spider Man

This. It looks like a lame attempt to redo Spiderman the same way Nolan re made the Batman series.

Bump 07-20-2011 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 7759457)
This. It looks like a lame attempt to redo Spiderman the same way Nolan re made the Batman series.

ya, only Spiderman was very solid or at least the first 2 films. I'm all for a transformers redo though.

MOhillbilly 07-20-2011 02:52 PM

pretty sure we already seen this piece of shit.

CoMoChief 07-20-2011 03:09 PM

horrible

Sure-Oz 07-20-2011 04:50 PM

Meh, its just too soon to remake it imo

Deberg_1990 07-20-2011 06:25 PM

Yea, i was just reading up on this....Sony/Columbia does still own the rights to this, just like FOX still controls the X-Men.

The reason they keep making Spiderman and X-men is because the studios will lose control over them and the rights will revert back to Marvel Studios if they dont continue making movies. Im sure Marvel would love to control these two properties again.

Brock 07-20-2011 06:28 PM

Blah, stupid.

Bowser 07-20-2011 06:38 PM

Zero interest in this.

rocknrolla 07-20-2011 06:47 PM

Same god damn story over and over and over. It's getting really old.

Tribal Warfare 07-20-2011 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 7759377)
1. Ang Lee's version sucked, Marvel was smart to reboot it.
2. It wasnt an Origin story, Marvel was smart to avoid that.
3. They needed to tie it into the Avengers movie series and tone.

I think Sony still owns the Spider Man rights? I dont think this is a Marvel Studios production like the Avengers series. I could be wrong...

they are going for another money frab of course because they'll lose the rights to Spiderman if they didn't make another movie within the 3 year window after the last one. Then the full property rights go back to Marvel

Deberg_1990 07-20-2011 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 7760150)
they are going for another money frab of course because they'll lose the rights to Spiderman if they didn't make another movie within the 3 year window after the last one. Then the full property rights go back to Marvel

Yes exactly...see post #23

Red Brooklyn 07-21-2011 01:09 PM

So, somehow, eventually, the rights will get back to Marvel and we can all look forward to yet another reboot. In the meantime, I really don't think this trailer looks that bad.

I think Garfield and Stone are very fine actors. I'm not really chomping at the bit for this, but it certainly doesn't look bad. I'll see it. Just maybe not in theatres. And I think it has the potential to be better than Raimi's first Spider-Man film.

Jawshco 07-21-2011 02:49 PM

Spider-man has always been my favorite comic book superhero, so I hope all movies about him are good. I was stoked when Raimi made his spider flicks. I'm a huge evil dead fan, and his first two Spider-man movies are two of my favorite comic book movies. The 3rd movie sucks out loud, so I try to pretend it didn't exsist, and wish Sam would have been given a 4th movie, but alas... We have yet another Spider origin movie.

This trailer is so-so. The tone of it seems a bit off. It overplays on the tragic parts of the story. Those elements are always there- so as long as this Spidey manages to handle it with his usual humorous quips I'll be okay. I like addition of Peter's parents- we haven't seen that part of his origin yet. New take on the web shooters is fine, & the costume is so-so. However, that POV nonsense looks like a poor video game. That part was awful- hopefully it's not in the movie.

Both the cartoons and the comics have rebooted Spider-man a few times. Now movies
Are following suit it didn't really bother me in those other medias so I'll try to give this one a chance.

Param 07-21-2011 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 7759468)
I'm all for a transformers redo though.

Yes please.

Now on topic, not watching this.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-23-2011 01:32 AM

Is this for real? And if it is, who the **** would go see it?

Totally Casstarded.

keg in kc 07-23-2011 06:02 AM

It looked better to me watching the trailer on the big screen, but the first person bit at the end seemed like a gimmick out of a video game trailer. I was surprised by how much they had in the trailer, though; they haven't been shooting all that long IIRC.

I'm not as vehemently against remaking it as other people. All I really care about is whether it's good or not, and a minute of it isn't enough to tell.

Hammock Parties 07-23-2011 07:30 AM

Looks like a TV show.

Deberg_1990 07-23-2011 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7765646)
. I was surprised by how much they had in the trailer, though; they haven't been shooting all that long IIRC.

Actually they have havent they? IM pretty sure filming is complete.

keg in kc 07-23-2011 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 7765974)
Actually they have havent they? IM pretty sure filming is complete.

Could be. I think they started shooting in early May. They can't be very far along in the overall production at this point, though, that was mainly what I was saying. They're a year away from release.

MoreLemonPledge 07-23-2011 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7766001)
Could be. I think they started shooting in early May. They can't be very far along in the overall production at this point, though, that was mainly what I was saying. They're a year away from release.

Dane would know.

ThaVirus 07-23-2011 07:26 PM

Saw the trailer today in 3-D (not sure if that makes a diff?).. But I thought the first-person view was pretty cool. Even so, am NOT ready for a reboot.

Deberg_1990 07-23-2011 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 7766851)
. Even so, am NOT ready for a reboot.

IMO, they would have been better off just starting with a new cast and storyline. What i dont like is another origin story. Boring and predictable so close to the last one. Everyone by now is very familiar with Spideys origin. Why waste another 30 to 45 minutes of your movie setting that up again?

ThaVirus 07-23-2011 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 7766889)
IMO, they would have been better off just starting with a new cast and storyline. What i dont like is another origin story. Boring and predictable so close to the last one. Everyone by now is very familiar with Spideys origin. Why waste another 30 to 45 minutes of your movie setting that up again?

Exactamundo, sir. Spider-Man is the biggest superhero cashgrab outside of Batman at the moment. EVERYONE knows who Spider-Man is.. Le sigh. It's all about the paper...

EDIT: I guess I can give them points for attempting to flesh out Parker's parents and that whole relationship dynamic... But the more I think about it, no. No, I can't. I won't pretend to have read every Spidey comic, but I am a Spidey fiend. As far as I'm aware, Parker's parents have never been a factor, in any incarnation.

The_Doctor10 07-23-2011 08:30 PM

While I understand why the studio is doing it, I don't see the public being too terribly enamored with a reboot of a franchise that was absolutely beloved until the massive turd that was Spider-Man 3... Spider-Man was the most successful opening of all time for a reason. Spider-Man 2 was one of the best comic book movies ever made; at the time, probably THE best.

This just feels unnecessary. Batman needed to be saved. Superman needs to be saved. Green Lantern is gonna need a reboot if the second one is as bad as the first. At this point, even the Hulk reboot was pointless since they fired Edward Norton for reasons unknown and cast Mark ****ing Ruffalo.

I'll be fapping to Emma Stone tonight, no denying it, but this feels like it would set a dangerous precedent if it were to work, and I'm almost hoping it doesn't.

The_Doctor10 07-23-2011 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 7766938)
Exactamundo, sir. Spider-Man is the biggest superhero cashgrab outside of Batman at the moment. EVERYONE knows who Spider-Man is.. Le sigh. It's all about the paper...

EDIT: I guess I can give them points for attempting to flesh out Parker's parents and that whole relationship dynamic... But the more I think about it, no. No, I can't. I won't pretend to have read every Spidey comic, but I am a Spidey fiend. As far as I'm aware, Parker's parents have never been a factor, in any incarnation.

In the animated series in the 90s, I remember there being a big arc about how his parents were American spies in the Soviet Union... what came of that, I don't remember. But it was a fairly big deal if I recall correctly.

Deberg_1990 07-23-2011 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unleash_the_Phury (Post 7766963)
While I understand why the studio is doing it, I don't see the public being too terribly enamored with a reboot of a franchise that was absolutely beloved until the massive turd that was Spider-Man 3...

Agreed.....heck even Spider Man 3 was enormously popular and successful in a pure dollars sense.

keg in kc 07-23-2011 09:57 PM

They're also trying to change the dynamic of spider-man himself, apparently, making him more snarky in costume, to match the books.

007 07-23-2011 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7767099)
They're also trying to change the dynamic of spider-man himself, apparently, making him more snarky in costume, to match the books.

snarky?

beach tribe 07-24-2011 01:26 AM

I'm wondering if this a way to plug him back into the marvel universe.
I heard somewhere that they are going to introduce the infinity gauntlet into the MU in the Avengers movie, which means there's actually something planned that is bigger, and involves even more characters than the Avengers.
Which means Thanos is coming! Baddest MFer to ever be Illustrated.
if you like, or ever liked comics, read the Infinity Gauntlet series.
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansit.../news/?a=20688
http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/h...l29/thanos.jpg
http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/h...tlet_super.jpg

keg in kc 07-24-2011 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 7767245)
snarky?

Smart-ass. Jawing with the bad guys.

Deberg_1990 07-24-2011 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7767380)
Smart-ass. Jawing with the bad guys.

The Tobey MaGuire movies had this as well....maybe not alot, but it was there at times.

keg in kc 07-24-2011 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 7767421)
The Tobey MaGuire movies had this as well....maybe not alot, but it was there at times.

I should have phrased that better than 'more like the books'. It made it come across like I was being critical of the Raimi movies and I'm not (well, not the first two). It was more about the perception of the new one. The trailer makes the new one look dark, and apparently it isn't. Spider-man is supposed to behave like Spider-Man in the books, it's not an emo movie or anything like that.

Bowser 07-24-2011 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 7767295)
I'm wondering if this a way to plug him back into the marvel universe.
I heard somewhere that they are going to introduce the infinity gauntlet into the MU in the Avengers movie, which means there's actually something planned that is bigger, and involves even more characters than the Avengers.
Which means Thanos is coming! Baddest MFer to ever be Illustrated.
if you like, or ever liked comics, read the Infinity Gauntlet series.
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansit.../news/?a=20688
http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/h...l29/thanos.jpg
http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/h...tlet_super.jpg

I've been calling for "them" to do a Secret Wars/Infinity Gauntlet movie ever since I first saw the animated Final Fantasy movie. An Infinity Gauntlet movie would be so massive that the best way to do it would be that FF type animation, imo.

Either way, it would be awesome.

Deberg_1990 07-24-2011 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7767461)
The trailer makes the new one look dark, and apparently it isn't. Spider-man is supposed to behave like Spider-Man in the books, it's not an emo movie or anything like that.

Thats good to know.

jiveturkey 02-07-2012 12:46 PM

It probably makes sense for me to post this in the right thread.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/X46IidjdYKA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Bowser 02-07-2012 12:59 PM

That trailer looks better, but I still have little interest in this. They really should have waited ten years or so to reboot this. Did the same thing with the Hulk, too.

bevischief 02-07-2012 01:03 PM

I can't wait for this to bomb at the box office. This might be worse than the GI Joe movie.

Deberg_1990 02-07-2012 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 8356198)
That trailer looks better, but I still have little interest in this. They really should have waited ten years or so to reboot this. Did the same thing with the Hulk, too.

Not sure if we disussed it already, but i believe Sony had to make another one so they didnt lose the rights. Like what FOX keeps doing with X-Men.

Im sure Marvel would love to get total rights back to both.

Bowser 02-07-2012 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8356222)
Not sure if we disussed it already, but i believe Sony had to make another one so they didnt lose the rights. Like what FOX keeps doing with X-Men.

Im sure Marvel would love to get total rights back to both.

Yeah, I get that. Kind of like how they're pushing another Superman movie out. At least Fox got the last X-Men (more) right.

And really, Marvel SHOULD have the rights to these, seeing as how the brought these characters about and all.

jiveturkey 02-07-2012 01:58 PM

Isn't Marvel owned by Disney now?

Tribal Warfare 02-07-2012 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jiveturkey (Post 8356468)
Isn't Marvel owned by Disney now?

correct

Deberg_1990 02-07-2012 04:33 PM

I think it looks decent. I like that the spidey action looks more practical instead of CGI and cartoony like the Raimi movies.

The Franchise 02-07-2012 04:38 PM

Emma Stone > Kirsten Dunst

Munson 02-07-2012 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Petitelance (Post 8356999)
Emma Stone > Kirsten Dunst

She is so damn hot! I'd give anything to have consensual sex with her.

Buck 02-07-2012 04:55 PM

Uhhhh....Mirror's Edge anybody?

keg in kc 02-07-2012 06:19 PM

Not only is Emma Stone an upgrade (yes, I know, different characters), I'm not sure Garfield isn't, as well.

Red Brooklyn 02-07-2012 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 8357199)
Not only is Emma Stone an upgrade (yes, I know, different characters), I'm not sure Garfield isn't, as well.

Oh, I'm 100% positive that he is. Absolutely.

Deberg_1990 02-07-2012 06:35 PM

Come on now, Dunst in her prime was no slouch. Plus she's got Stone beat in the breast dept.

WhiteWhale 02-07-2012 06:51 PM

This movie is gonna suck donkey balls. :(

Red Brooklyn 02-07-2012 06:57 PM

I'm optimistic. I'm not gonna rush right out and see the first second I can. But it looks like a pretty good Superhero flick. And I love the cast. Looks a ton better than Spider-Man 3.

Frosty 02-08-2012 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Brooklyn (Post 8357285)
I'm optimistic. I'm not gonna rush right out and see the first second I can. But it looks like a pretty good Superhero flick. And I love the cast. Looks a ton better than Spider-Man 3.

That wouldn't take much.

I'm looking forward to this. I was a huge Spider-Man fan as a kid so I am a sucker for stuff like this. I like that they are going with Gwen Stacy as the love interest instead of MJ and The Lizard as the bad guy.

FAX 02-08-2012 10:56 AM

Actually, this looks like it might be way better than the Toby movies.

I'm down for a ticket.

FAX

Thig Lyfe 02-08-2012 01:22 PM

I just hope the video game is as good as Spider-Man 2's game was.

ThaVirus 02-08-2012 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jiveturkey (Post 8356148)
It probably makes sense for me to post this in the right thread.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/X46IidjdYKA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

GAHHHH! I LOV3 SP1D3RMAN!!!!111!

I like the look of the new suit; it's sleek! Idk about the actor playing Spidey but he seemed a lot more Peter Parker-ish than Tobey Maguire; and I liked the little quips he was making with the guy stealing the car. That's very much something Spider-Man would do. Lizard as the villain should be good too.

I'd hate to get ahead of myself, but I hope they do Venom as the villain in the second film... Redemption for the abomination that is Spider-Man 3.

Red Brooklyn 02-08-2012 03:37 PM

Andrew Garfield is an incredible actor. He's like 92% of the reason why I'm optimistic about this little movie.

DBOSHO 02-08-2012 06:29 PM

Im gonna see it. Tobey will still be my favorite spiderman and i think its reeruned they rebooted already but the secOnd trailer looks solid

Micjones 02-08-2012 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBOSHO (Post 8359527)
Im gonna see it. Tobey will still be my favorite spiderman and i think its reeruned they rebooted already but the secOnd trailer looks solid

I saw the 2nd trailer last night. Looks pretty solid.

Sure-Oz 02-09-2012 08:50 PM

This actually looks pretty good

mnchiefsguy 02-09-2012 08:55 PM

After seeing that second trailer, I might give this movie a chance. It has some potential.

Easy 6 02-10-2012 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoreLemonPledge (Post 7759049)
The A-meh-zing SpiderMan.

Perfect.

I'm not diggin Harry Potter as Peter Parker.

Agent V 02-10-2012 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 8358938)
GAHHHH! I LOV3 SP1D3RMAN!!!!111!

I like the look of the new suit; it's sleek! Idk about the actor playing Spidey but he seemed a lot more Peter Parker-ish than Tobey Maguire; and I liked the little quips he was making with the guy stealing the car. That's very much something Spider-Man would do. Lizard as the villain should be good too.

I'd hate to get ahead of myself, but I hope they do Venom as the villain in the second film... Redemption for the abomination that is Spider-Man 3.

You're right about that. It could be another chance to give the Venom story the time it deserves. Instead of forcing it on the director like Avi Arad did.

WhiteWhale 02-12-2012 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBOSHO (Post 8359527)
Im gonna see it. Tobey will still be my favorite spiderman and i think its reeruned they rebooted already but the secOnd trailer looks solid

Toby was the worst thing about those movies. He's over-rated. He does one thing well: Cry on cue. That's it.

His expressions of rage are so comical I can't keep a straight face. I to this day wish they had casted someone more fitting to the role than a 1 note crybaby guy.

DBOSHO 02-12-2012 07:34 PM

Im one of the few that actually enjoyed tobey i guess.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.