No I have a feeling that we will get the first pick and then trade down. Not far just like 3 or 4 and get extra picks. We will take either Barkley or Wilson whichever is left. Barkley is the most like Cassel so it would make sense that that is the QB that Pioli would most likely identify with.

NFW KC doesn't draft a QB in the early rounds if not first overall.
NFW.

Whether that QB signs with KC may be another matter....

With the new CBA you can take many more risks than in the past. If the guy doesn't look like he will work out then you find another one and it doesn't cripple the franchise financially or in terms of years because you aren't feeling forced to stick with them for five seasons.

In the NFL right now, you can tell rather quickly if a QB is going to work out. 10 years ago guys as raw and not overly talented such as Wilson, Tannehill, Ponder, and Dalton would be getting crushed. But the league is just so QB driven that what used to be career average guys can come in and immediately be average to above average.

How is Barkley like Cassel? Because they both attended USC?

I cannot believe some of our ignorant chiefs fans. This I not the year to draft a qb, d would be better sited.

****you all, we have practically an entire defense of 1st rounders, almost all of the shit ones are high picks. Where is this team because of them? We have one man nuetering an entire team with his play at the most important position and you all clamour, not this year.

This is a franchise settng futility thisyear. The odds of sucking this bad next year nd getting a qb then are nil. Next years qb class does not seem heads and shoulders above thisone. If we are in postion to get geno and pass then we deserve the repetive disappointment we have always gotten.

He may not be luck,but he is a smart, athletic passer that is 10x what we have now.

If the top 3 draft order is KC, Jacksonville, Cleveland, I fully expect the top 3 picks to go QB QB QB.

If any of them trade out of their spot, it will be because a team wants to move in and take a QB.

If we trade down to 4 or later, we're ****ing screwed.

We have only had two games this season where we have been competitive. Ravens and Steelers. (Saints doesn't count. That was just flukish on so many levels IMO). Both games our QB was basiclly taken out of the equation. 7-17 for less than 100 yards vs 34 rushes at the 2:00 minute mark of regulation last night. 50 rushes give or take a couple vs the Ravens.

We need a QB. Rest of the team showed what they can do again last night. Just sad we don't have a QB to go with them.

You don't think Tannehill is above average in talent?

WE deserve what we get? No, WE don't deserve that at all because WE don't choose the draft picks.

Perhaps I should have said "and/or raw or overly talented." He has above average talent but is certainly still raw.

Only Chiefs fans.

Your team breaks on offensive record in futility that hasn't been touched since 1929, and you STILL don't want to draft a QB.

Only Chiefs fans.

They're not that important. Plus, we already have a Pro Bowl QB on the roster.

I think we should draft a long snapper first overall. Everyone knows we need to make sure the snap for our punts is always on target. Don't want a disaster out there.

Of the three.
College, size, arm strength, physical ability along with comments like Barkley is Cassel but with experience. There have been a lot of people report these type of similarities. Keep in mind it is just of three not saying Barkley is Cassel.

That's reeruned.

The only things that Cassel has in common with Barkley is the school and Jersey number.

We should of jumped up and drafted him.

Yarp.

Who doesn't want to draft one? BlackBob...come on who gives a **** what that dude has to say.

BlackBob and now this Pond of Red douche.

Agreed. Kid could be good though. Rocket arm and a swagger. Good base to build on.

I think Barkley has the highest floor. I think he's pretty certain to be at least Chad Pennington. Geno Smith might be a total bust or he might be Aaron Rodgers. Wilson might be Phillip Rivers or he might be David Carr.

I'm fine with either of the three, with the proper coaching staff and system in place for either. Just do it.

And behold, a list of people that most of us would rather see under center than Cassel.

This post sums you up.

Dumbass
Posted via Mobile Device

Barkley is 6'1, Cassel is 6'4.

Barkley>Cassel in arm strength, release, and throwing motion.

this

I want to draft a first round QB. Are you stupid?

This year?

your last sentence is the most important which we dont have. whichever qb this regime drafts they will **** up his development

This regime will neither be drafting nor developing our QB.

honestly what makes you think that? our owner doesnt give a ****. I just think chunt would rather not think about the chiefs and let pioli stay here next year.

seriously, what makes you think this horrible excuse of a regime will not be here next year? just cus you want them to be gone? me too. I wish for it evryday but our owner is a gutless vagina who lives 1000 miles away from the stadium

One of the first things Clark stated was that he wanted the Chiefs to draft and develop a QB. Pioli either does that this offseason or he will be relieved of his duties.

only took him 4 ****ing years

He already did/is doing that with Stanzi. :spock: Where did Clark say he had to draft a 1st rounder?

Any year, every year, until you get a plus player in that position.

Hahahah yeah right. Stanzi was like Brodie and so on. Those guys were not what Clark was referring to.

You didn't answer my question. Do you want to draft a QB with our first this year?

who the **** doesnt want to draft a qb with our first? hell ill take qbs with every damn pick till one turns into a stud. you win in todays nfl with a legit qb. all other positions are come second

And **** you black bob. You are the main Moran around here.

Why not quit reppin people when you have it turned off. Douchebag

Draft one of the 3 QB's in round 1.

If we somehow lose Bowe, draft a WR with our 2nd round pick. If we keep Bowe, draft BPA.

Not that ****in hard

This. And he'll waste another draft with shitty, useless picks.

I have answered it 1,000 times. I have answered it at least three times today dude. You think you are like Tom Cruise in that lawyer movie or something.

No, I don't want to take a QB with our first pick.

Yes, I want to take a QB later in the first round out of the top 10.

I want to get Te'o and get back into the first.

Oh really which one? E.J. Manuel, Landry Jones, Mike Glennon, or if they come out Tyler Bray, Aaron Murray? All of these guys are more of a project than a guaranteed starter.
There is no way that Smith, Barkley, or Wilson will make it out of the top 6 let alone after 10.

Is this a hybrid of all the best parts of Aaron Murray and Tyler Wilson?

If so, I for one, welcome our new hybrid overlord rookie.

In your opinion.

There are a large number of NFL fans who think otherwise. I guess we'll see.

Sauce, bitch.

and where are these fans? need evidence to backup your outlandish claims....

otherwise this is more garbage

Look around and find them yourself. Plenty of people here are having their doubts. I have posted articles by scouts etc.

Dig through the garbage yourself.

LMAO that would be awesome. No merely typing to fast I guess. I will edit though.

Don't.


I want to savor our new UberQB. LMAO

If you aren't joking, and I know you aren't, I truly pity you more than any other poster I have EVER came across.

If you have followed the NFL for more than a month and still feel that a team like KC should pass on a qb in the top 5 picks of the 2013 draft, you should be neutered.

Your posts are like advertisements for Condoms and buttsecks.

:facepalm:

I'm curious BB, what QBs out of the top 3 (Barkley, WIlson, Smith) would you justify taking in the 1st round? Keep in mind Bray, Murray, McCarron, and Manziel will not be available. ROFL

What in Chiefs history makes any of you believe they will draft a QB with their first pick. They won't. Bank on it.

On top of that we currently have a GM that places no importance on drafting a QB early and an owner that is deep in pocket to the GM.

Clark will either become assertive, decisive, and pretty much change his entire personality overnight or we're hosed...

F.N.G. here to tell you your all wrong. Burgers out haleys gonna make leftwich look like a halfa star like they did with cassle in ne. 1st rounder will be pissed away and well somehow butt**** ourselves in to laundry and trade for leftwich. Itll be the icing on haleys **** you kc cake. Atleast until he starts mass producing these cakes as the HC in san diego. That being said everyone feel free to jump my shit for being the new guy.

There's not a chance in hell this team doesn't draft a QB.

Cassel is ****ing done.

That's like saying Hitler is done because there's no more V2's...

This. The Chiefs will have a promising rookie and competitive vet on the roster in 2013

They have no choice... to not draft one at #1 would invite an uproar that'd make the current chorus seem like nothing.

Just ****ing wait.

We will acquire a veteran that will win 5-8 games to calm the truefans down, and draft a mid-round QB to try and (fail) to calm down the intelligent fans.


T-Jax part 2 here we come!

There will be an "I'm leaving forever" movement in which no fanbase has ever seen.

doubt anyone jumps your shit for being a new guy.

They are going to jump your shit for making STUPID ****ING POSTS
Posted via Mobile Device

I will move on at that point. focus on KU sports and be done with the NFL.

Its getting closer and closer to that anyway. These last 4 years have driven alot of Chiefs fans away anyways...

I won't jump your shit for being the new guy. I just need to know what the **** you said before that last sentence.

I would, too. I have tried to think about what other team I could become a fan of, but it never quite works.

If the Texans were still average, I could cheer for them, but since they are good I would just be another band-wagon bundle of sticks.

While common sense may suggest that because Cassel is done we should draft a QB with our first pick, I don't think they are dependent on one another.

I honestly wouldn't be surprised if we pick someone up via trade or FA instead.

I hate to agree with Kietzman here but this organization hasn't given any indication now or in the past that they're willing to make an investment in a QB in the 1st round. The Chiefs seem to go against the common sense grain.

This post mentions that we'll finish with 3 or 4 wins. HOW THE **** IS THAT POSSIBLE?!!

Chirs Mortensen just answered a question about KC on SN

Rick (Kansas) asked:


Is there a light at the end of the tunnel for Chiefs fans at all?

Chris Mortensen (11:05 AM)


I believe there is.This team still has a good core base of talent. When a team underachieves, you second-guess a lot, including the coaches and the GM because it's clear that the Chiefs do not have a dynamic quarterback in Matt Cassel. I will say that Cassel is an outstanding young man, a great teammate, does have some skills but it not up to the standard. That being said, I believe the Chiefs have a foundation on which to build and be successful and sooner than later.

:spock: ehh o.k.

Great, now the national idiots think we are decent because we almost beat a Leftwich lead Steeler team.


:facepalm:

He was referring to the **** you cakes from the previous sentence, implying that Haley will be the head coach in SD an make those **** you KC cakes all year. It was a great first post filled with good points and solid grammar.

Why is Matt Cassel the only shitty QB in the history of the NFL where national media guys feel like they have to apologize before they rip into him? Jesus Christ. Nobody ever ****ing says, "Look, Tarvaris Jackson is a warm, funny guy who I'd love to have a beer with, but I don't know if he can lead the Vikings to the Super Bowl" or "Rex Grossman has a beautiful soul and his wife really makes the best key lime pie you'll ever have, but I don't think he's the answer at QB." They just say, "These guys aren't good QBs." Period. End of discussion.

What the **** is it about ****ing Matt Cassel? Does Belichick own dirty pictures of all sports media personnel, and he makes them all say nice things about his former players? Is it his dreamy eyes? His boyish smile? What is it?

Good God, Mort. Just say "The Chiefs have good players, but Matt Cassel is a bad QB." You're not being vulgar. You're not even saying "sucks." You're just telling the truth about a really ****ing shitty player who doesn't belong in the NFL.

I think next year's team will feature the following:

Cassel/Hasselbeck or Garrard/Stanzi with another 5-7th round draft pick competing with Tanney assuming he re-signs.

GM: Scott Pioli
HC: Crennel or darkhorse in Mangini.

Not going to care at that point. I'm divorcing this team if that happens.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-HHkhIniJ1s..._MON098143.jpg

1st rounder you draft will be the next Bledsoe

this would be a big upgrade

you are right... almost every article I read states "he is such a nice guy"

I am sure some folks thought that about Nixon too!

I won't be back if this happens.

I can put up with Cassel this year because he is helping to drive the nails into his and Pioli's coffins. However, I won't watch another game with him as the Chiefs' QB after this year.

**** you

I will be re-assessing my fandom if Cassel is back.