ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   News Murder charges in revenge killing by father of children slain by drunk driver (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=269960)

Rausch 02-13-2013 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonkyPuncher (Post 9399956)
Should have just beat him to death, as a father that's what I would have done..

We've got one of those in here doing life.

Saw a man raping his daughter and beat him to death.

Yes, despite that, despite the fact any father would clearly go temporarily insane, he got life...

DonkyPuncher 02-13-2013 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 9398878)
"The right" thing? Get real. That is the absolute wrong thing. Kick his ass. Fine shoot him. fuck no.

Like it or not this was an accident. A grossly negligent one, but that doesnt make it right.

I can see all the lunatic dads on this thread. These are the type of guys that if your kid gets his ass kicked at school you go run over to the parents house with a bat. Idiots.

Umm your kid getting beat up at school by another kid is world's away from watching your kid get slaughtered by a speeding vehicle drove by a drunk worthless ass****. I'm guessing you're not a father???

DonkyPuncher 02-13-2013 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9399971)
We've got one of those in here doing life.

Saw a man raping his daughter and beat him to death.

Yes, despite that, despite the fact any father would clearly go temporarily insane, he got life...

That's crazy man, I could seem him doing a simple manslaughter charge but life?? Damn

Garcia Bronco 02-13-2013 01:37 PM

Not guility for me as well. The longer we tolerate these drunk assholes the worse off we'll be.

kepp 08-28-2014 10:49 AM

Texas Dad Acquitted in Shooting Death of Drunken Driver Who Killed 2 Sons
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2014/08/27...-killed-2-sons
Quote:

A jury has acquitted a Texas father who was accused of fatally shooting the drunken driver who killed his two sons.

David Barajas, 32, was pushing his broken-down car along a road with his 11- and 12-year-old sons back in 2012 when Jose Banda, a drunken driver, fatally struck the two boys.

Father on Trial for Alleged Murder of Drunken Driver Who Killed His 2 Sons

Prosecutors say Barajas then shot Banda, but authorities never found the weapon or physical evidence.

Barajas repeatedly cried when he heard the verdict today.

More from The Associated Press: Prosecutors alleged that Barajas killed 20-year-old Jose Banda in a fit of rage after Banda plowed into Barajas and his sons while they were pushing a truck on a road near their home because it had run out of gas. Twelve-year-old David Jr. and 11-year-old Caleb were killed.

Defense attorney Sam Cammack said Barajas didn't kill Banda and that he was only focused on saving his sons. The gun used to kill Banda wasn't found and there was little physical evidence tying Barajas to the killing.

Authorities said that after the crash, Barajas, 32, went to his home about 100 yards from the crash site, got a gun and returned to shoot Banda.

Legal experts said prosecutors would likely have to overcome jury sympathy for Barajas, who had the support of many residents of Alvin, which is about 30 miles southeast of Houston. Further complicating their case was that there were no witnesses who identified Barajas as the shooter and gunshot residue tests done on Barajas came back negative.

Investigators testified that a bullet fragment found in Banda's car could have come from a .357-caliber gun, and that ammunition for such a gun was found in Barajas' home, along with a holster. Cammack said his client never owned a gun and that tests showed the bullet fragment also could have come from another weapon.

A forensic scientist testified that blood found on the driver's side door and driver's arm rest of Banda's car was consistent with that of Barajas.

The defense called only three witnesses to testify during the trial, which began last week.

But prosecution witnesses told jurors during questioning by Cammack that more gunfire had taken place well after Banda was shot — pointing to the possibility that the actual shooter was still at large — and that a search of Barajas' home failed to find any evidence that directly or indirectly linked him to the crime scene.

Cammack also suggested that Banda could have been shot by his own cousin or half-brother, who told investigators that they witnessed the crash but fled the scene. Both testified that they did not shoot Banda.

Cammack also used 911 calls to create a timeline that suggested Barajas would not have had enough time to shoot Banda.

BWillie 08-28-2014 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 9400016)
Not guility for me as well. The longer we tolerate these drunk assholes the worse off we'll be.

you shouldn't get to take the law into your own hands, that is why we are a civilized society. The problem I have with it is the jury and attorneys knew what they were doing, they were playing to the emotional side of things that this guy lost his kids yachety yachety ya and got the jury to intentionally look away from the other evidence.

This guy deserved to get manslaughter pure and simple. It is an outrage IMO.

loochy 08-28-2014 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 10856135)
Texas Dad Acquitted in Shooting Death of Drunken Driver Who Killed 2 Sons
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2014/08/27...-killed-2-sons

ha

suck it bwillie

Dave Lane 08-28-2014 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pablo (Post 9396668)
The right thing would have probably been to raise your other two children. Old west style justice doesn't help his wife and other kids.

This. Straight up murder. He will have a chance to feel justified in prison.

You can't shot every drunk driver.

kepp 08-28-2014 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 10856156)
you shouldn't get to take the law into your own hands, that is why we are a civilized society. The problem I have with it is the jury and attorneys knew what they were doing, they were playing to the emotional side of things that this guy lost his kids yachety yachety ya and got the jury to intentionally look away from the other evidence.

This guy deserved to get manslaughter pure and simple. It is an outrage IMO.

Did you read the "evidence" the prosecutors had? They wouldn't convict anyone with that, much less a grieving father with local sympathy.

htismaqe 08-28-2014 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 9400016)
Not guility for me as well. The longer we tolerate these drunk assholes the worse off we'll be.

But we should tolerate someone shooting someone else just because they can't control their anger?

kepp 08-28-2014 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 10856170)
This. Straight up murder. He will have a chance to feel justified in prison.

You can't shot every drunk driver.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...5&postcount=80

BWillie 08-28-2014 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 10856172)
Did you read the "evidence" the prosecutors had? They wouldn't convict anyone with that, much less a grieving father with local sympathy.

It shouldn't be about that. I can see giving him manslaughter instead of murder because of his state of mind but the guy actually even had time here to go get his gun and kill this guy. I'm tired of parents thinking that when someone happens to their children they can do whatever they want. It's bullshit. The way the Joe Horn case, this case, and many other cases ending up the way they do in Texas is very disturbing.

kepp 08-28-2014 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 10856177)
It shouldn't be about that. I can see giving him manslaughter instead of murder because of his state of mind but the guy actually even had time here to go get his gun and murder this guy in cold blood. I'm tired of parents thinking that when someone happens to their children they can do whatever they want. It's bullshit.

You skipped the part about the evidence, huh? They never found any gun and there was no record of him ever owning a gun. They couldn't even prove what kind of gun the shot came from.

htismaqe 08-28-2014 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 10856180)
You skipped the part about the evidence, huh? They never found any gun and there was no record of him ever owning a gun. They couldn't even prove what kind of gun the shot came from.

Well, that's certainly compelling.

kepp 08-28-2014 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10856181)
Well, that's certainly compelling.

Now, he DID have .357 ammo and a holster at his house...but no gun.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.