Nothing, really. I'm pretty sure they do. It's all just speculation.

Welcome to the 21st century NFL, land of 24x7 "news".

Reid only started Foles last year because his hand was forced. When Vick wasn't turning the ball over....he was injured. Reid had no other choice. And I may be wrong....but I don't think that Reid was in charge of the drafts last year.

If the Chiefs were to get Foles in a trade with the Eagles (for moving from 1 to 4) along with a 2nd this year and, say, a high pick next year, I could see them picking up someone like Manuel with one of the 2nds. They need to get more than one QB.

I just LOL'd ROFL

No they really don't.

I keep hearing this.

Does Denver have more than 1 QB? Does New England or New Orleans?

The solution at QB is quantity.

They said on mike and mike today that Foles got told by Chip Kelly that he would be given every opportunity to start in Philly.

Yep.

This is all a bunch of useless chatter.

Do you think they will go into next season with only 2 QBs or are you saying if you have a quality starter, it doesn't matter what's behind him?

I was going off of Dorsey's history of picking QB's and letting them sit and develop behind the starter. If you can do that and then translate them to draft picks later, that's a win. Granted, in my original post, a 2nd may be too high for that idea but I was thinking they might hedge their bets in case Foles doesn't continue to develop.

There isn't much else to talk about at this point in the season.

The Combine can't get here soon enough.

Denver's backup was drafted in the second round. NEs was drafted in the third.

I think your last line was a typo...?

Bolded.

Dorsey's history of picking and sitting QBs assumes you have an established veteran in place. Foles is essentially another rookie. Same for Matt Flynn. They're simply not options.

Exactly my point.

:banghead:

Yes, I meant to say the solution is QUALITY, not QUANTITY.

FTR, if we somehow went into training camp with Geno Smith, Nick Foles and Ricky Stanzi...that would be flat out awesome.

I have been high on all three for some time now...there was a time Foles was talked about as a top ten pick and we all know Stanzi was a second round talent. :evil:

I think it's the reverse of that.

Not If they trade for Foles, goodbye to drafting a QB in 1st 3 rounds.

It's..

If the Chiefs don't like this years class and decide "we're not using a top 3 round pick on this crop of QBs for the value", then they trade for Foles.

Probably semantics but I think you get what I'm saying. It will be telling of what they thing about this year's class.

Nonetheless, I think I'm with htismaqe on this one that we can get someone very similar in the 3rd in this years class so maybe we should hold off.