I think he was trying to make it known to everyone that the Seahawks made Denver their little biznatches.

43 to 0 right?

Oh my, are you certain? Why, the only way I could possibly imagine a worse defeat than a 40 point blowout would be to lose after having a lead in overtime.
That would be very depressing. Especially if it happened at home.

To the mod that changed the thread title: PM me for coordination on receiving your handjob.

Well then I need to re-evaluate my assessment.

I mean shit they have only one fewer win than soft ass Broncos ROFL

I put a whole 30 seconds worth of work into that post and no one even noticed it was a haiku.... Evidently, no one noticed Seattle beat Denver either.

Waaaaaaaaaaaait wait wait wait.

I think you've buried the lead there.

The Seahawks defeated the Broncos??? How many times??

twice.

The Seahawks have fallen back to earth partially because of FA losses (Tate, Clemons, Browner, Bryant) and injuries (a good chunk of their O-line, Zach Miller, a couple of corners, a couple of LBers, Mebane). Tate was a big loss on offense as was Miller because they were Wilson's security blankets. Harvin didn't work out and no other WR has stepped up, so Wilson is pushing it more, throwing more picks and having to run more.

However, despite all that, they still beat Denver.

Upon reading this thread and discovering how many times the Broncos have already lost to the Seahawks in the year 2014, Champ Bailey is currently announcing his retirement.

Every time Seattle beats Denver, Peyton Manning adds an inch to his forehead.

:LOL:

It's been two posts since someone mentioned Seattle beating Denver.

That long? They beat them TWICE...