New definition of winning
 

In lieu of our current situation with team, gm, coaching staff, qb, etc...I propose we define a new standard for a Chiefs "win". If we hold the opposition to less than 40 AND score more than 10 it should be counted as a win for the balance of the season.

Unfortunately, I don't think our team will "win" our next game. I will have a great view of it too. I'll be in a luxury box at Heinz field.

First time I am not looking forward to going to a Chiefs game.

Have fun "winning duh" at the game

I think anytime the Chiefs get in the redzone they should get 4 points. It will make the games more interesting. Last night it happened twice, so add 8 points to the final score and it seems more interesting.

I'm making this a standard for any future bets involving the chiefs.

Turn it into a drinking game for every bad play , you won't remember anything after halftime.

Best idea yet

Four points for a trip to the red zone, three points for every turnover. Now spot yourself fifteen points. Then you've got something.

Shoot, the second we have a lead, we shold call it a WIN!

They should probably end the season at that point.

In my eyes, it will be.

If we could ever tie a game this season with a 1 point extra point (with a 6+1 TD), we should IMMEDIATELY have to go for two instead of kicking it for 1....

just so we have a 50% chance of being in the lead during a game......

Since the offense would need to get at least 3 yards on the play, I figure that 50 percent chance is reduced to 8 percent (factoring in the probabilities of penalties, turnovers, QB fetal positions, etc.).

The abstract version...

http://beautifullyflaweddivinelychos...e1-1.jpg?w=400