And there it is. Arenas=dogshit.

Therefore, equal value trade for Arenas=dogshit.

I think that silly... this is a minor trade.

Arenas was a Free agent after this year. Chiefs save 350k with this move.

[QUOTE=Dayze;9648798]We traded a guy we were gonna cut for a guy they were gonna cut.

can we sign Karlos Dansby or Richard Seymour with that 350k that Arenas frees up?

/CP

Tony Gonzales for a FB everyone!

so now Teicher is an expert


normally he's called an idiot

where is Clay what was Javier Arenas's PFF numbers last year compared to Dunta and Sean Smith

we all know Anthony Sherman is a ****ing terrible FB so we dont need those

And the hits just keep on coming.

[QUOTE=Dayze;9648798][QUOTE=Strongside;9648791]

I"m not so much pro-Arenas; I'm more concerned we traded for a guy that would most likely would've been cut if he was truly not going to be a part of a vertical offense etc.

sort of like Smith - who would've in all likelihood been cut due to his salary.[/QUOTE]

This is incorrect. Smith's salary is garuanteed. The 9ers would have still been on the hook for it if they cut him.

We now have the same number of FBs (5) as we do CBs (5) on this roster right now.

JFC, dude. Arenas is horrible. He was not going to make the roster. Who would you have suggested we trade him for? This is obviously 2 teams that have shit players looking to unload them. We need camp fodder. They need depth as well. They swap players. Period. Equate it to the Guthrie for Sanchez trade. Two players that neither team want, so they agree to swap.

There is nothing to justify. Arenas is a bad player. This guy is probably a bad player too. Who ****ing cares?

If Jalil Brown touched the field with a single toe this year, Dorsey should have jumper cables clamped to his junk with the motor running

Usually by idiots though.

[QUOTE=seaofred;9648813][QUOTE=Dayze;9648798]ah. ok. thanks.