He seems to have a knack for doing the most dramatic, incredible things, in the biggest moments of the biggest tournaments.

LOL...hater? argumentative? World Peace? are you kidding me?

that's too funny...yeah, he is the best player, by far. So far it's a f'ing joke. So much of a joke that it's comical to watch the announcers and fans slobber that knob.

Im not a hater, Im just tired of the incessant non-stop glorificiation of someone who's proven that he's an entire class above all the others.

I think maybe I need to start a tournament where a highschooler beats the crap out of 9 year olds, over and over and over and over and over and over again...then when Im acting the ass about his win, and someone says 'dude this is BS' I can act like you.

So what if they do. I am not watching for their benefit. I am watching for mine.

No the networks love Tiger, and can you blame them.

Yep, Tiger wins every single tournament he is in, the competition is soooo bad.:rolleyes:

It's a good thing you think that...the networks love you even more.

American Idol anyone?

can you guys give me the leaders?Posted via Mobile Device

Im sorry...You may not have read the thread. Tiger has never...let me type that slowly...NEVER. One more time for those that dont read too quick...N-E-V-A-R lost when leading by 54 holes.

It's so exciting it's worth watching all 6 hours of coverage. dont forget to watch the commercials

So I should not watch because you say so?LMAO

Considering I hardly watch more than 3 hours of TV per week they don't make much money on me anyway.

Yeah? So? I am not watching to see if he wins or loses. CAN YOU READ?

Yes...can you? I really appreciate this. Thanks.

So, the announcers should not talk about him because he is the best player in the world? They should not talk about him even though 90% of the people tuning in want to hear about him? At least they are not slobbing his knob like Kobe, who has NOT proven he is as good as they think he is. Tiger has proven it. And comparing the rest of the golfers in the world to 9 year olds, and Tiger to a highschooler is just stupid. 9 year olds do not have the same physical ability as a highschooler, but the golfers Tiger competes against have all the same chances to make themselves as strong as Tiger, the same chances to make themslves as mentally tough as Tiger, they have the ability to have the same or better equipment as Tiger. The playing field is even and fair. They just can't do the same things Tiger can. 9 year olds versus highschoolers is not a level playing field.

Unless it was a 9 year old Tiger versus highschool players, then you would be right, the highschoolers wouldn't have a chance.

Guru, don't you dare use facts and logic when posting in this thread.:spock:

Anyway....

leaders?Posted via Mobile Device

Westwood -1
Mediate E
Wood E
Ogilive E