But neither did Lazanby, Moore or Dalton.

Brosnan would most certainly have banged every chick in the room but he was given shit scripts with lame action segments. I think he could have pulled off Craig's trilogy with ease.

That said, Craig has been phenomenal, IMO.

Disagree. I'm on record as not being a big fan of Connery, but Craig was the first Bond for me that really nailed that, especially the "kill every man in this room" bit. I'd be scare of Craig's Bond unlike any of the others.

Moore, Dalton and Brosnan, were obviously more debonair type Bonds, less physical.

Plot holes don't concern me. Skyfall was original and interesting and had real characters.

Into Darkness was just a ****ing ripoff with cardboard cutouts.

Craig is the best Bond IMO.

Craig's Bond seems the most capable but the least polished.

I think Brosnan had the most suave, debonair Bond look. Like, I'd honestly be worried he might **** my wife or some shit.

Just watched this one on Netflix today.

James Bond is such a pimp.

I'm pretty sure this is my favorite all-time Bond. SO many of the others, I enjoyed a lot, but as mindless detached entertainment. Ooh, gadgets, oooooh girls, how dapper.

This one I WANTED him to win and wasn't sure how he would. And there is some of the most breathtaking imagery to go along with a rip-roaring tale.

And for any Bardem detractors, he seemed a seamless mix of Hannibal Lector, Jason Bourne and The Terminator. Sociopathy, skill and determination. DEFINITELY my favorite Bond villian.



was a lone cheesy note, but was necessary to move the narrative forward.

I think Skyfall was the best of Craig's Bonds so far with Casino Royale not too far behind it. I enjoy watching Quantom of Solace, but it's obviously not as good as the other two.

I also agree on Bardem; he was a great Bond villain. Moreso than that pansy Greene or whatever from QoS.