With Mars mission and rover Curiosity, NASA hunts building blocks of life
 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/nation...ALX_story.html

The last time the United States landed a mission on Mars to look for extraterrestrial life or its building blocks, Gerald Ford was president and the nation had just finished celebrating its 1976 bicentennial.

Next week, the long-delayed second attempt will try to deposit a rover on the planet’s surface.

The descent and landing in the early hours of Aug. 6 will be the most complex and hair-raising in planetary history. The destination is a deep crater with a three-mile-tall mountain that NASA could only dream about using as a landing site until very recently.

It’s the most ambitious, the most costly ($2.5 billion) and the most high-stakes mission ever to another planet. It was also described last week by the agency’s top scientist, former astronaut John M. Grunsfeld, as “the most important NASA mission of the decade.”

“There is no doubt that this is a risky mission, and that is coming from a human-spacecraft guy,” Grunsfeld said. “It’s hard to get something this big and complex to the surface of Mars, and then to get it to start roving. Thousands of people around the world working on it will be feeling their lives are riding on the mission landing successfully. We’ll all know soon if the risk was worth it.”

What the Mars Science Laboratory mission and its rover named Curiosity bring to Mars is a capacity to analyze the planet with much more sophistication than before, and to do it over a sizable and scientifically rich expanse.

The goal is not to find Martian life per se but rather to ferret out carbon-based organic compounds that are building blocks of life, and then to determine whether the Gale Crater landing site was ever suitable for creatures. Both are integral parts of the science of astrobiology — the search for life beyond Earth.

A fully loaded SUV

At 10 feet long and seven feet high at the top of its camera mast, Curiosity is the size of an SUV and weighs almost a ton, about three times more than the Spirit and Opportunity rovers sent to Mars in 2003 on a primarily geological mission. Its robotic arm for digging soil and drilling rock is seven feet long, almost three times longer than previous rover arms. This tool will provide more and better samples for the lab’s instruments, which will do their analysis on Mars and send back the results to scientists here.

Curiosity will have numerous ovens to bake soil and rocks up to 1,800 degrees and analyze what comes out; it will have a laser zapper to free up potentially important targets in rocks; it will have cameras with unprecedented capabilities, including one that will take video of the last several minutes of the high-drama landing, now dubbed “seven minutes of terror” by NASA.

Getting to Mars, and especially landing on it, is difficult. Forty-four missions — flybys, orbits and landings — have been sent to the planet by NASA, the former Soviet Union, Russia, the European Space Agency, Japan and China, and about one-third have made it. All six successful landings were flown by NASA. (A Soviet capsule made a soft landing in 1971 but then sent back only 14 seconds of data, so it is not considered to have succeeded.)

Curiosity’s descent — after a voyage that began last Nov. 25 and covered 354 million miles — will be particularly stressful because the weight of the spacecraft required a new landing technique. The capsule containing Curiosity will enter the atmosphere at 13,200 mph and have less than seven minutes to slow down enough to drop the rover gently onto the surface of the planet.

Much of the technology is new or being used in a novel way and, while the component parts have been tested and retested, the landing as a complete sequence has never been tried. “Actually, the landing will be our first test that the systems can work,” said the project’s chief engineer, Robert Manning.



But the risk goes beyond the difficulty of the landing and the complexity of Curiosity’s 10 major instruments. That’s because Curiosity will land just as Congress and the administration debate a plan to slash NASA’s Mars and planetary programs significantly. NASA officials and Mars aficionados hope the rover will make discoveries that will limit the cuts, while knowing that a crash landing or failed instruments could further curtail the programs.

“I think a major discovery by Curiosity, such as finding the building blocks of life or any other indication of life, would certainly lead us to reconsider our science approach at Mars,” said James Green, director of NASA’s Planetary Sciences Division. “Why? Because if there is, or was, life on Mars, then we’d have to assume life is everywhere in the galaxies. We would have to rethink our place in the universe.”

‘Our place in the universe’

One reason that NASA has not sent a life-detecting mission to Mars in so long is that the first one came back with very disappointing results. The twin Viking landers touched down in 1976 with great anticipation that not only the building blocks of life but also life itself would probably be found.

Instead, the Viking mission found a cold, desert planet that came to be seen as virtually incapable of supporting life. While one life-detection experiment using nutrients brought to Mars and tagged with radioactive carbon did show positive results several times, NASA officials and other scientists concluded that those findings were most likely in error. More disheartening, the instrument designed to identify organic molecules came back with a finding of “no organics.” Without organics, virtually all scientists say, there can be no life.

But in the past decade, NASA scientists and others have produced evidence that the planet was once much warmer and wetter. They know, for instance, that the Gale Crater site was once covered in water, and they know that it has minerals and clays that can be formed only in the presence of water.

In addition, NASA astrobiologist Michael Mumma reported in 2009 finding plumes of methane gas erupting at specific spots and at predictable times on Mars. More than 90 percent of methane on Earth is formed as a byproduct of biology, from cows’ digestive systems and rotting trees to the life cycle of tiny microbes. It remains unknown whether some of the methane on Mars also comes from biological sources.

And finally, a paper in May from Andrew Steele of the Carnegie Institution of Washington identified organic material in meteorites known to have fallen to Earth from Mars. An expert in the contamination of rocks that fall to Earth from space, Steele concluded that some of the organic material he found was clearly not from Earth, and so it either came from Mars or was picked up by the meteorite as it flew through space.

Climbing the mountain

Combining the promising new science about Mars with the capabilities of Curiosity, NASA science chief Grunsfeld said he considers it likely that organic materials will be found this time. Gale Crater is a much more promising site than the plains where the Viking landers did their work, and Curiosity has more than 35 years of improved technology and know-how.

The rover will also be the first to approach, analyze and then partially climb a Martian mountain. The layered outcrops of what has been named Mount Sharp will provide a geological history of the crater and perhaps the planet, and so are an integral part of the Curiosity mission.

Geologists will be looking at those layers to determine when water was present in the crater, whether it moved like a river or was like a lake, what elements and compounds were in the soil and air, and even what temperatures and other atmospheric conditions existed. The lead scientist for the rover is John Grotzinger of the California Institute of Technology, and he is a geologist.

“We have never had an opportunity even close to this on Mars before,” he said, referring to the exposed and “readable” cliffs of Mount Sharp. “We’re just waiting with bated breath.”

An additional Curiosity goal is to learn more about how to protect astronauts who may someday fly to Mars. The landing of a large vehicle is part of that learning curve, but so too is Curiosity’s radiation assessment detector, a toaster-size instrument that will measure and identify high-energy and potentially harmful radiation on the Martian surface, such as protons, energetic variations of common elements, neutrons and gamma rays.

The Curiosity mission is scheduled to last for another two years, but it could continue much longer if funding becomes available. The rover’s power source is a nuclear battery that, if all goes according to plan, could move the rover and keep it warm for years longer.

There is precedent for prolonged rover missions: The Spirit and Opportunity rovers were designed to operate on Mars for 13 weeks, but Spirit sent back information until 2009, and Opportunity is still traveling. So if the landing succeeds and the rover and instruments work as planned, Curiosity might be telling us about Mars for years to come.

Gawd, I'd love to watch this landing. However:

It's at 1:30 Monday morning, and I have to be at work at 7. Maybe I'll nap Sunday and stay up all night. ****ed up sleep patterns FTW!

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/participate/

I would imagine that NASA TV will be covering it. I'm going to verify and DVR it.

Yes. NASA TV will cover it.

http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html

In a recession and spending 2.5B on this. Makes sense.

Methinks you'll be singing a different tune when they find Blackbeard's treasure there.

At least it was spent on an American project, and not aid to Pakistan.

All funding for scientific progress should be halted immeidately, and all funds directed to socialized healtcare. YAY!:thumb:

Don't be ignorant...

http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/9...dc551b90eo.gif

http://statastic.com/category/government/nasa/

http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/1...endingbyca.png

Don't turn one of my favorite subjects into some political garbage you assholes.



I hope they do find life. Hopefully it will inject a need to explore more and unite the human race.

The Vatican will denounce NASA and call Mars Satan's planet.

Let the record show it was at least the 5th post before someone posted a comment that science and engineering is a waste of time and money. :facepalm:

Right? Amazing.

NASA to broadcast Mars rover landing live in Times Square
It'll be shown on Sunday night in NYC and several other locations around the US


NEW YORK — NASA's biggest Mars rover landing yet is about to hit Broadway.

New Yorkers hoping to see the Aug. 5/6 landing of NASA's huge Mars rover Curiosity alongside like-minded space fans can head to Times Square here on Sunday night to catch the rover's touchdown on the Red Planet live on a giant LED television screen.

NASA Television's coverage of the agency's $2.5 billion Mars Science Laboratory mission landing will be broadcast live on the Toshiba Vision screen that hangs below the iconic New Year's Eve ball in Times Square, space agency officials say.

The broadcast begins at 11:30 p.m. EDT Sunday night and runs until 4 a.m. EDT Monday morning. The exact time of landing is scheduled for 1:31 a.m. EDT Monday, though it will be late Monday night at the rover's California-based mission control room.

"In the city that never sleeps, the historic Times Square will be the place for New Yorkers to participate in this historic landing," John Grunsfeld, NASA's associate administrator for science missions, said in a statement Tuesday. "When you think of all the big news events in history, you think of Times Square, and I can think of no better venue to celebrate this news-making event on Mars." [ Mars Rover's Nail-Biting Landing in Pictures ]

NASA Curiosity probe is a Mini Cooper-size rover designed to spend two years exploring the vast Gale Crater in pursuit of some of Mars' biggest mysteries, including the question of whether water, and maybe even life, ever existed there. The rover launched in November 2011 and is now poised to land in a nail-biting maneuver this weekend involving a hovering rocket-powered " Sky Crane " that will lower the vehicle to Mars' surface via tethers.

The landing broadcast will originate from Mission Control at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory's in Pasadena, Calif., which designed the rover and is managing the mission. If the landing is successful, viewers will be able to see scientists receive the first signal from the rover on Mars.

The audio track for the broadcast will be carried on the online radio station Third Rock Radio, which can be accessed from the NASA homepage at and through the Tuneln mobile app.

"We're pleased the Toshiba Vision screens will offer a unique view of this great scientific achievement, the landing of the rover Curiosity on Mars," said Eddie Temistokle, senior manager of corporate communications and corporate social responsibility for Toshiba America Inc.

Other sites around the country, including many of the NASA centers, also will host live viewing events for the landing, which is NASA's most ambitious and expensive planetary mission on the horizon.

To find a Mars rover landing event near you, check NASA's complete listing of events here.

NASA's webcast of the entire Mars rover Curiosity landing will begin at Aug. 5 at 11:30 p.m. EDT (0330 Aug. 6 GMT) on NASA TV here.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48428167.../#.UBhf16BQTSg

I'd love to hear we found any kind of life anywhere but at this point I'm skeptical they'd tell us even if they did...

Why does that government expenditure bar chart show "four billion gallons of Tang"? Did our government actually purchase that? To what end? Is there some secret Tang storage bunker in the midwest? Do they know something about Tang we don't know?!? Now I'm either afraid to drink it, or I feel the need to go buy as much of it as possible!

NASA has a ton of Mars landing related events going on. Check out this map, there is probably one near you...

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/ma...ons/index.html

Yeah, because the money wasn't spent here in the U.S. paying our own scientists and technicians and advancing our own technology, it was just stuffed into a rocket and blasted into space.

Dumb ****.

Tang, better than cocaine.
/NASA

Is there a down side to this? :D



I bet they will discover a "translation" that God created life on other worlds, too.

wuuuut?

pacific time, and should read late Sunday unless its going to be Tuesday morning elsewhere

I always get a good chuckle from these 'we're still looking for definitive proof in microbial life, struggling with advanced propulsion' bullshit.

This government knows/has things that would melt your brain, i'm convinced that stuff like this is a cover, 'hey we put a mini-cooper sized vehicle on Mars!'.

That aint jack.

If you want to melt your brain, try to figure out how and why gravity works.

I wouldnt dare attempt such an undertaking, i'll let these guys explain it for me...

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_-agl0pOQfs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

130 am is gonna hurt.

For those looking for an online feed, here you go.

<iframe src="http://www.ustream.tv/embed/6540154" width="608" height="368" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border: 0px none transparent;"></iframe><br /><a href="http://www.ustream.tv/" style="padding: 2px 0px 4px; width: 400px; background: #ffffff; display: block; color: #000000; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10px; text-decoration: underline; text-align: center;" target="_blank">Live broadcast by Ustream</a>

ROFL


you know they will

I'm very excited about this. I plan to stay up and watch it and model it with my cat as the rover, a can of Dr. Pepper as the spacecraft, and my kitchen table as the landing area.

Why isn't the coverage starting? It was supposed to start half an hour ago and it's still not on. Hopefully this isn't a metric/English system problem.

ICP posts = permaban



I hope all these guy die slowly from gang rape by the black panthers

Where the **** do we watch the Mars landing tonight?

Watch it here;

http://www.ustream.tv/nasajpl

It's BS this isn't on TV.

It's on directv 289.

:hail:

Someone obviously didn't read post #27

This shit is like a giant Rube Goldberg machine.

That or the old board game Mouse Trap.

They're "breaking open the peanuts", which is to NASA mission control what "taking the 20th shot of jaeger" is to a fratboy: SHIT'S ABOUT TO GET REAL.

Am I supposed to be seeing anything other than generic interviews with guys in polo shirts? Shouldn't there be people doing countdowns and reporting signals and stuff?

I have cartoons on 289. wtf

People eating peanuts.

<iframe width="640" height="385" src="http://cdn.livestream.com/embed/spaceflightnow?layout=4&color=0xe7e7e7&autoPlay=false&mute=false&iconColorOver=0x888888&iconColor=0x 777777&allowchat=true&height=385&width=640" style="border:0;outline:0" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe><div style="font-size:11px;padding-top:10px;text-align:center;width:640px">Watch <a href=http://www.livestream.com/?utm_source=lsplayer&amp;utm_medium=embed&amp;utm_campaign=footerlinks title=live streaming video>live streaming video</a> from <a href=http://www.livestream.com/spaceflightnow?utm_source=lsplayer&amp;utm_medium=embed&amp;utm_campaign=footerlinks title=Watch spaceflightnow at livestream.com>spaceflightnow</a> at livestream.com</div>

Looks like CNN might be covering it as well if you're looking for an alternative.

FFS am I on your ignore list?

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...6&postcount=27

I think I have the wrong stream. There are multiple women in this mission control room..

Sorry, 346. No clue where I got 289.

The guy on CNN with the dated glasses and moustache did a nice summary of the mission goals.

It's the number of cubic inches in the engine of a 1966 Ford Mustang. I bet that's where you got it.

They're clapping, things must be going well.

Title IX. NASA can't have a football team unless there are women in mission control.

I can't believe Opportunity is still operational.

8 ****ing years.

We need another word for intelligence that surpasses Genius.

These guys are way beyond.

That mission was worth every penny spent for NASA.

Just entering Mars atmosphere now.

They're getting tones from the spacecraft during entry! It's doing well!

Can you elaborate for those of us unfamiliar with why that's significant?

Has any of these missions/rovers ever failed?

The time delay is fun. The landing has already happened, but we're still several minutes away from knowing what happened.

It looks like, outside of the Area 51 scientist from Independence Day, NASA fired anyone under 40..

If you're part of the team who made this thing, I wonder how nervous and/or sick you are right at this point.

Wasn't it a Mars ship a while back that was killed because of the metric/English mixup?

I probably shouldn't talk about that. It's jinxy.

LMAO

I'm just glad he was able to find work after that debacle.

NASA's not a growth industry.


When I joined the defense industry in the mid-80s, we noticed at one point that all of the engineers were either in their 20s or older than 50. That didn't bode well, and sure enough, a lot of us got laid off in the next down cycle.

They're getting antsy. THIS IS HAPPENING (somewhere between 36-250 million miles away)!

Its a rover mission, along with Spirit that was launched in 2004.

Spirit died, but Opportunity is still working.

They were only supposed to work like a couple yrs, maybe, not sure.

Oh crap, I knew that. I mistook Opportunity for Curiosity. Whoops.

Made it through entry! PBJ

Not the first time in my life I've done that! #rimshot

That post applies to the two posts immediately preceding it.

LOL...it's decreasing speed to Mach 2! Holy crapola!

Three minutes to finding out what happened a while back.

Parachute deployed, woot!

:D

Curiosity has landed!!

Touchdown. Kansa.. er, NASA.

Touchdowwwwwwwwwn, Kannnnnnnsas City!