Are the Jets an option for Geno trade?
Not trying to break any ground here, just some quick thoughts on if this is an option:
The Jets have absolute shit at QB. They have the 9th, and probably the 13th if the Revis-to-Tampa deal goes down. They can probably get more value from the two firsts, but anything can happen. Especially if they think there will be a QB run in the top 10 picks that will take 2-3 of the top guys out of the running. Has there been any rumored interest in Geno from the Jets? For the record, I want Geno; I just think we end up trading down. |
LOL....an hour later and no comments.
This board can't wait for till the 25th. LMAO |
I still think they go with Sanchez for 1 more year.
and they are stuck with Tebow. If Sanchez sucks, Tebow will get his shot this year. |
Quote:
I'm still curious. I just wish I could sleep until the 25th (my birthday!) and then have all my questions answered. |
Quote:
|
I think that's incredibly unlikely, to be honest.
|
Nobody is an option for a Geno trade unless he slips past 20.
QB's always gain steam the closer to draft day - except this year. In the eyes of real GMs and scouts apparently these guys suck. Nobody is getting hot. It's amazing to me that guys like Ponder, Locker, Weeden and Tannehill were able to gain momentum but nobody in this draft class can. I wish someone would leak a real teams scouting report on Smith, Barkley and Nassib. My gut tells me it would read a lot more like the guy from PFW than the niceties stated in other reports. |
Probably not.
|
Quote:
|
I think we need a Geno forum until draft day so that we don't have 20 new Geno threads started every day in the Lounge forum.
|
No, he's the Chiefs pick at 1.
|
The jets also had the #1 pick the year Peyton decided to go back for his senior year. Ended up being a bad time to have the #1 pick. I can't even imagine :(
|
Quote:
|
Can't WAIT to see Geno in red and gold, baby!
Posted via Mobile Device |
They just have too much shit going on with the QB position right now to draft another QB that high. imo.
That said ... the jets have done a lot of stupid things so anything is possible. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I was told last year that the Chiefs shouldn't trade up for Tannehill because Matt Barkley will be in next year's draft, with that last senior season under his belt to make him even BETTER. QBs sometimes do extraordinary things in those final seasons that they return for. But I really don't think Murray, McCarron, Boyd, or Thomas are capable of those kinds of extraordinary seasons that will be necessary for them to be the supposed necessary lightyears ahead of Geno |
Quote:
|
I don't think they will...
|
Quote:
|
ya absolutely no way they go qb with their first pick. they need to help the sanchise out for atleast one more year. then cut him and fire rex. theyll take ansah or montgomery
|
depends on how quick, and how sexy Geno's feet look.
|
or patterson
|
Quote:
So there's that. However, I have no idea how they look on camera or if teh naked feets are enough to pull a long-haired-Ryan to draft him... |
I didn't have much hope for a trade down of any kind to begin with. Now I'm approaching zero hope for that. Say hello to Luke Joeckel.
|
If we even have a shred of hope for a trade down I can't see any other trade partner than the Eagles. And I won't pin much hope to that either.
|
|
So people honestly believe we are getting Geno?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
There is no way the jets are gonna trade 9, 13, 39 and a pick next year for G. Smith.
If they do, the Chiefs better be on that like a bear on honey. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
We would be lucky to swap ONE of their 1st rnd picks, get their second and next years first. No way we get BOTH of their 1st rnd picks unless that was it... |
They won't, they'll snag Geno for themselves at 1
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
I'd take far below value to trade down. If we got a 2nd and 6th to move down 4 spots I'd be all over it... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
As a Jets fan, I can tell you with certainty, the Jets are not interested in Smith. They have spoke with him but I believe this is posturing. The Jets are stuck with Sanchez through this season, they signed Gerard to push him and Tebow will be released any day now , in that the Jets have found zero interest in him fro other teams. Look for TebowTime in Canada next year.
|
Quote:
AND, if we do not want Geno, I would think we would be interested in that deal. |
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Yep, stuck with the pick and no lineman is worth it. Hello Geno!
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
The Jets FO NEEDS to move on a QB now, rather than later. Sanchez is not it, and the franchise knows it. However, the Jets simply don't have the cap room to make a lot of moves right now, which is why that defense is getting gutted. On the flipside, now more than ever is the time for the Jets to make a move on a franchise QB because they'll get one at absolute rock bottom pricing while they try to rebuild the interior on both sides of the line. The question is, as the Jets GM, do you risk sending the Chiefs your 1st, 2nd, and next year's second, for the 1.1 to get a QB? Or do you use the three picks in those two years to use as building blocks for your 2015/2016 team, presuming you land a QB in that time? As much as the Jets want it, I don't think they do it this year. As much as they'd love to relieve Sanchez, I think they bite it and draft for the future this draft. Plenty of talent to build on in the first 4 rounds of this draft. Quote:
Quote:
Then, in a serious 180, they'll be some of the largest critics of the QB's from this draft, saying it was a brilliant choice not to draft Geno, to make up for their blind faith, well, blinding them. Quote:
Quote:
Warmack is top notch but nobody dares draft a Guard in the top 10, let alone 1.1, JoeckdkfldjlsL is a top notch tackle, and being a team built upon the run and likely building upon the play action, I don't see any drawback to anchoring the tackle position this year, even if jodkdkljlkjlL slides to the right this year, to be evaluated for a season to take over Albert's spot next year. |
Why do people get so butthurt when someone mentions the possibility of the team drafting Geno? It's creepy.
|
The Jets actually traded up to draft Sanchez. I'm not kidding.
|
Jets trade Revis to Tampa and then use those picks to trade up and get ahead of the jags to select Geno Smith.
I imagine the Chiefs would be all over that. |
Quote:
|
There is a lot of :bong: going on in this thread.
|
The Jets need an old vet QB this year. To be the paper toliet seat cover that gets flushed with the rest the shit at years end.
|
There's no one worth taking for the Chiefs at 1, yet we are going to trade down?
Nope. |
The Jets can't draft a QB because of Sanchez's contract. Tannebaum deserved to be fired. What kind of reerun gives a guy like Hot Dog a contract like that?
Sanchez is the biggest albatross in the league. They can't trade him, they can't cut him...they are basically stuck with the guy. And then they have the second biggest albatross in Tebow. What a complete disaster. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I do agree though that the Jets are very unlikely to trade for him. Your new GM wants picks, and I can see him trading down if possible. I can't imagine he will be trading up for anything, let alone Geno. |
Sanchez is mentally exploded at this point, likely past coming back from. But NYC, just didn't fit his mentality level. He never really had a chance.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
So glad we aren't drafting Jokel...
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Will Jokels fat head actually FIT in to one of those pretty little ghey white helmets? Stay tuned to find out!
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Jets could unload a quarterback as part of Revis trade
Posted by Mike Florio on April 12, 2013, 3:47 PM EDT If/when the Jets ship cornerback Darrelle Revis to the Buccaneers, another current member of the roster could be making the trip to Tampa, too. While poking around the question of whether the Jets could be trying to include quarterback-of-all-trades Tim Tebow in the package (which would keep the Jets from cutting Tebow and seeing him sign with the Patriots), we tripped over a previously unknown nugget. Per a source with knowledge of the situation, the discussions between the Jets and Bucs have included the possibility of the Buccaneers assuming the contract of quarterback Mark Sanchez. Yes, Sanchez. He has a guaranteed base salary of $8.25 million for 2013. If he didn’t, Sanchez would have been cut by now. If the Jets could unload that obligation, they’d surely jump at the chance. It’s unclear whether Sanchez would compete for the starting job in Tampa. On one hand, he hasn’t done enough in recent years to justify the opportunity. On the other hand, coach Greg Schiano doesn’t seem to be sold on quarterback Josh Freeman, who was taken 12 spots behind Sanchez in the 2009 draft. Sanchez thrived in New York during a couple of Schiano’s seasons at Rutgers. Schiano possibly thinks he could coax better performances out of the man who took the Jets to back-to-back AFC title games to start his career. In Tampa, his offensive coordinator would be Mike Sullivan, who helped Eli Manning to a couple of Super Bowl wins. Or maybe the Bucs would simply be absorbing Sanchez’s salary and cap number for 2013, and turning around and cutting him loose. At this point, all we know is that the subject has come up in the trade discussions. For now, it’s still merely a possibility. An intriguing possibility, but a possibility nevertheless. |
Quote:
|
Marky isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He'd redue his contract to live and work near some bay pussy.
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Some dude at work was trying to tell me Teblow was on KC's radar. If you want me to flip the **** out, there's your ticket to ride.
Posted via Mobile Device |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.