ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Eric Fisher sucked against Denver. Proof inside! (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=286616)

WhiteWhale 09-17-2014 06:27 AM

It's one thing to cherry pick 4-5 bad plays (like Clay did with Brandon Albert, and pretty much said he sucked because of it, but I digress) but it's a bit different when there's 20+ plays to gif up.

Bad form Fisher.

jd1020 09-17-2014 06:32 AM

I love the argument that there was nobody worth the #1 pick so therefor saying drafting Fisher was a bad idea is stupid!

So nobody was worth the pick, including Mr. Fisher, which makes it a perfectly acceptable time to use that pick on a position that doesn't need help.

BigMeatballDave 09-17-2014 06:36 AM

Some of you act like the Chiefs are the only team to ever take a T 1.1, and do it every year.

Sandy Vagina 09-17-2014 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 10922678)
It's one thing to cherry pick 4-5 bad plays (like Clay did with Brandon Albert, and pretty much said he sucked because of it, but I digress) but it's a bit different when there's 20+ plays to gif up.

Bad form Fisher.

No one should dispute that. Fisher had a real bad game. I do understand where the other side is coming from.. as.. when watching live and forgiving a play or two.. it didn't seem like he had that bad a day. If watching again and focusing on him? No.. real bad day. None of the OL had a good day.

The OTs were lousy.. Fulton and his penalties at critical times are brutal. McGlynn should never be a starting OL.

They all did a better job in week 2 than 1.. though Fisher was equally bad.

:shake: .. just ****ing ugly.

jd1020 09-17-2014 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave (Post 10922684)
Some of you act like the Chiefs are the only team to ever take a T 1.1, and do it every year.

How many teams did it with already good tackles and major holes at playmaking positions?

WhiteWhale 09-17-2014 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneWolf (Post 10921464)
Who's doing the grading?

Do you know what a genetic fallacy is?

Your criticism of PFF is a genetic fallacy. You have never, once, explained what is inaccurate or wrong about it. You just insult the people behind the site. It's akin to saying 'you're wrong because you're stupid'.

-King- 09-17-2014 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 10922695)
How many teams did it with already good tackles and major holes at playmaking positions?

Most people realized we'd keep either Albert or Bowe. Would you have rather let Bowe go?

Maybe we could have drafted Tavon Austin. He's a playmaker drafted in the top 10 that year that's setting the league on fire!
Posted via Mobile Device

jd1020 09-17-2014 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10922700)
Most people realized we'd keep either Albert or Bowe. Would you have rather let Bowe go?

Maybe we could have drafted Tavon Austin. He's a playmaker drafted in the top 10 that year that's setting the league on fire!
Posted via Mobile Device

If my QB is going to be Alex Smith? Ummmm, hell yes I would have rather let Bowe go. Hell, probably could have gotten a pretty good pick for Bowe since before Alex became his QB people were talking about him being a top 10-15 WR in the league.

And I've already said I would have taken Cordarrelle Patterson, not Tavon Austin.

WhiteWhale 09-17-2014 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10922700)
Most people realized we'd keep either Albert or Bowe. Would you have rather let Bowe go?

Maybe we could have drafted Tavon Austin. He's a playmaker drafted in the top 10 that year that's setting the league on fire!
Posted via Mobile Device

In retrospect?

I'd have kept Albert.

BigMeatballDave 09-17-2014 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 10922695)
How many teams did it with already good tackles and major holes at playmaking positions?

New HC/GM. Overpaid for a QB. Aging existing LT, money to be saved.

New leadership wants their own guys.

It's not brain surgery.

I didn't want a LT at 1.1, but given the circumstances, I think pretty much any team would have done the same.

WhiteWhale 09-17-2014 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10921808)
Do you believe Jamaal Charles was one of the top 100 players in the NFL in 2012? PFF doesn't.

That's the site you're defending.

It's all number crunching. I think PFF excused it away with the fact that he had more fumbles than TD's and didn't gain much yardage after contact (stupid way to judge an elusive runner).

PFF's imperfection doesn't equate worthlessness.

jd1020 09-17-2014 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave (Post 10922711)
New HC/GM. Overpaid for a QB. Aging existing LT, money to be saved.

New leadership wants their own guys.

It's not brain surgery.

I didn't want a LT at 1.1, but given the circumstances, I think pretty much any team would have done the same.

"Any team would have traded 2 seconds for Alex Smith and promptly replaced his best lineman, which just so happened to be his blindside protection, with a rookie from the MAC."

Logic!

BigMeatballDave 09-17-2014 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 10922720)
"Any team would have traded 2 seconds for Alex Smith and promptly replaced his best lineman, which just so happened to be his blindside protection."

Logic!

LMAO Work on your reading comprehension.

warrior 09-17-2014 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 10922502)
Geno at 1.1? This is why you'll never be a GM, or scout, or even waterboy. Because you are a ****ing moron.



:thumb: I agree 100%

jd1020 09-17-2014 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave (Post 10922721)
LMAO Work on your reading comprehension.

Explain which part I didn't comprehend.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.