ChiefsPlanet
Page 4 of 5 123 4 5
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs So, how does everyone feel about the Reid era so far? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=271679)

bevischief 04-02-2013 06:11 PM
On the fence, ask again after the season. Not waiting again like the last time.

The Bad Guy 04-02-2013 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9550380)
meh ... talent level looks remarkably like it did last year.


The cornerback position is the only place where i see any significant improvement.


Cross your fingers and hope that coaching makes a big difference
No improvement from the qb position? That's a bunch of shit.

By merely removing Cassel and Quinn and their turnover tendencies and replacing them with someone who doesn't turn it over is a huge difference.

Why do we have to hope this staff is an upgrade? Anyone with a pulse and who's watched at least a weekend of football knows it is.

chiefzilla1501 04-02-2013 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by crossbow (Post 9550874)
This all the way. They totaly screwed up and did it so hard that it will cost them for years. They paid so much for Alex that they have to play him regardless if he makes them look like fools or not. They will win enough games now that they will be out of reach of an impact QB and since they traded their last chance to get one (next years high 2nd) they won't be able to move up. They boxed themselves in. Realy bad move. Not impressed at all. I expected them to do something bold and creative not Marty and safe. This "We can't draft a QB because there is no Andrew Luck and RG3" idea is a cop out. There rarely are guys like that in one draft.

Same lame moves as have been made for the last 30 years will bring the same lame results.... Blowouts if they make a playoff game.
It's an over-reaction.

The Chiefs have not signed Alex Smith long-term. They have not passed on any QBs in the draft yet. They have not made any indication that they refuse to find a young QB to groom behind Smith with the intention of him being the long-term starter.

If Alex Smith is the best QB we come up with over the next 3 years, and it's because we didn't try, then yes. If he's a stopgap for a year or 2, I really could care less how many picks we gave up.

Simplicity 04-02-2013 06:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guru (Post 9548399)
So far it is SSDD.
Don't you ****ing dare compare Alex Smith to Matt Cassel, Stanford Routt to Sean Smith, Fasano to Boss. Reid to Crennel, Carl to Carl, Dorsey to Pioli.

Cannibal 04-02-2013 06:15 PM
Shitty year to get the #1 pick, but very excited about the upcoming season.

Cannibal 04-02-2013 06:18 PM
I think Reid is a very good HC that just became stale in Philly. After a long enough period of time, the players tune the coach out.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 04-02-2013 06:19 PM
Alex Smith is a bummer and Bob Sutton is a concern.

EDIT: Alex Smith has only played two full seasons in 8. Chase Daniel has thrown less than 10 NFL passes(IIRC).

Cannibal 04-02-2013 06:21 PM
I know for damn sure Reid is far more competent than our last 3 coaches.

Cannibal 04-02-2013 06:22 PM
This offense had the potential to be explosive even with Alex Smith in my opinion.

Chiefs Pantalones 04-02-2013 06:25 PM
Haven't played a game yet so you can't really judge. Alex Smith doesn't have me hot and ready like a Little Caesar's pizza though to be honest. I have low expectations for this team because of the QB position. I'm hoping to be impressed and proven wrong by Reid.

FlaChief58 04-02-2013 06:42 PM
Sofar, the only thing I question is the price they paid for Smith. I'd give them a B at this point.

crossbow 04-02-2013 06:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9550886)
It's an over-reaction.

The Chiefs have not signed Alex Smith long-term. They have not passed on any QBs in the draft yet. They have not made any indication that they refuse to find a young QB to groom behind Smith with the intention of him being the long-term starter.

If Alex Smith is the best QB we come up with over the next 3 years, and it's because we didn't try, then yes. If he's a stopgap for a year or 2, I really could care less how many picks we gave up.
They shit their pants trading for this bum. They paid way too much for him.

chiefzilla1501 04-02-2013 06:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by crossbow (Post 9550969)
They shit their pants trading for this bum. They paid way too much for him.
Without knowing their intention for Alex Smith, you can't say this.

Based on a lot of the moves the Chiefs made, it's seems like Reid/Dorsey got the directive that they need to start winning games fast and getting Arrowhead jumping again. If that's the directive, then Smith is the best choice for that. BUt that does not mean they are committed to Alex Smith as their long term QBOTF.

Mav 04-02-2013 07:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9550883)
No improvement from the qb position? That's a bunch of shit.

By merely removing Cassel and Quinn and their turnover tendencies and replacing them with someone who doesn't turn it over is a huge difference.

Why do we have to hope this staff is an upgrade? Anyone with a pulse and who's watched at least a weekend of football knows it is.
That doesn't register. It is perfectly logical, I pointed it out that no matter if alex smith doesn't throw for more than 20 tds, as long as he doesn't turn the ball over 38 times which your qbs did last year that its an upgrade, and will upgrade the defense, the offense and the special teams because you wont constantly be in horrible field position because of a turn over.

People want high lights. That's all they care about. They want the aerial show, even though the super bowl winning qb last year, threw 28 tds, and less than 4000 yards.......

chiefzilla1501 04-02-2013 07:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9551172)
That doesn't register. It is perfectly logical, I pointed it out that no matter if alex smith doesn't throw for more than 20 tds, as long as he doesn't turn the ball over 38 times which your qbs did last year that its an upgrade, and will upgrade the defense, the offense and the special teams because you wont constantly be in horrible field position because of a turn over.

People want high lights. That's all they care about. They want the aerial show, even though the super bowl winning qb last year, threw 28 tds, and less than 4000 yards.......
So a game manager.

In a QB-driven league where teams are moving to spread, the best QBs are throwing for 5,000 yards, and the top QBs are responsible for the majority of Super Bowl wins, our formula is for a 3,000 yard QB that wins with the running game and defense?

I am fine with Alex Smith as a stop gap. He's not a long-term answer. I don't give a shit how many yards Flacco threw for in 2012. He won the Super Bowl because in the playoffs, he was making throws that only elite QBs make.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:20 PM.
Page 4 of 5 123 4 5
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.