ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football 538 Calls Tom Brady the 43rd Clutchest Postseason QB (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=289920)

Hootie 01-13-2015 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 11267138)
and i guarantee i can hold my liquor infinity times better than your dumb ass.

maybe, but I can juggle knives better than you and I can carry three cups in one hand so ...

score another one for the dragon!

LoneWolf 01-13-2015 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 11267127)
Yes.

According to the statistics ran by Nate Silver, a very respected member of sports media, Tom Brady's teams with a REPLACEMENT LEVEL QB would have gone 12.6 - 13.4 in his 26 completed postseason starts. Peyton Manning's with that same REPLACEMENT LEVEL QB would have gone 8 - 16.

Thus, the idea that Tom Brady doesn't have enough weapons is criminally stupid.

Thanks for playing.

It's still not "proof". Just like WAR in baseball isn't "proof". It is a prediction based on a mathematical equation.

SAUTO 01-13-2015 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 11267149)
maybe, but I can juggle knives better than you and I can carry three cups in one hand so ...

score another one for the dragon!

i can carry three cups in one hand too, busboy

Hootie 01-13-2015 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 11267145)
Hahahaha.

Who the **** cares about that in a 'QB driven' league?!?!?!

:rolleyes:

Perhaps the most tired meme in all of football.

I agree.

So it's official, then.

Tom Brady has always been on better teams than Peyton Manning so we can no longer pretend that Tom only loses because he doesn't have enough weapons ... since his teams are always expected to win...and even with Matt Cassel, still expected to win half of the time in the most pressure packed games (playoff games) as proven by Nate Silver.

Whereas, without Peyton, his team would only be expected to win 1 out of every 3 times.

Eleazar 01-13-2015 12:43 PM

Flacco > Brady OR Manning.

LMAO

Never go full Hootie

notorious 01-13-2015 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 11267159)
Flacco > Brady OR Manning.

LMAO

Never go full Hootie

Sanchez > Brady, Elway, Manning, etc.

Hootie 01-13-2015 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneWolf (Post 11267152)
It's still not "proof". Just like WAR in baseball isn't "proof". It is a prediction based on a mathematical equation.

Ok, fair.

So the same people, like Prison Bitch (and me), who put a high emphasis on WAR, it's fair to say that this is a pretty revealing article and it kind of dispels a few myths about Tom Brady, correct?

Or are we just going to pretend WAR is no longer a good metric whatsoever because I brought it up and it kind of painted a picture I've been trying to paint for like 10 years now?

Hootie 01-13-2015 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 11267159)
Flacco > Brady OR Manning.

LMAO

Never go full Hootie

According to this metric, he is more CLUTCH than Brady or Manning in the postseason.

This metric has nothing to do with who is the more talented or better QB.

Moron.

Lex Luthor 01-13-2015 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 11267106)
No, not at all.

Brady's teams 12.6 - 13.4 with replacement level QB
Manning's teams 8 - 16

and if you don't want to agree with that, fine

but baseball geeks think of WAR as gospel, and none of this was math done by me

It was research done by someone who has more credentials than anyone on this board.

Any analysis that suggests Trent Dilfer, Mark Sanchez and Tony Eason are better quarterbacks than Tom Brady is the spastic rambling of a reerun.

See below for a mathematical proof that Hootie is an idiot:

http://www.vector-eps.com/wp-content...as-vector1.jpg

Don't blame me if you don't understand it. The math proves it. Hootie is an idiot.

TLO 01-13-2015 12:47 PM

http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com...34098819930135

SAUTO 01-13-2015 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 11267157)
I agree.

So it's official, then.

Tom Brady has always been on better teams than Peyton Manning so we can no longer pretend that Tom only loses because he doesn't have enough weapons ... since his teams are always expected to win...and even with Matt Cassel, still expected to win half of the time in the most pressure packed games (playoff games) as proven by Nate Silver.

Whereas, without Peyton, his team would only be expected to win 1 out of every 3 times.

here you go again saying this article actually PROVES something.


cue the "i never said that" post

Hootie 01-13-2015 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 11267165)
Sanchez > Brady, Elway, Manning, etc.

Not a big enough sample size, but he does have postseason wins against Brady and Manning in games the Jets were heavy underdogs in so of course it's going to skew the numbers.

But no, Sanchez isn't even on the list.

Tom is 6th; Peyton is 28th; Rodgers is 20th; Luck is 30th

learn to read

(I stated Tom as 43rd as an eye opener on your Sanchez list. Everyone knows that)

notorious 01-13-2015 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 11267179)

(I stated Tom as 43rd as an eye opener on your Sanchez list. Everyone knows that)

You make threads like this to get attention. Everyone knows that.

Hootie 01-13-2015 12:49 PM

LET ME JUST REPHRASE THIS, MORONS

THE WAR AT THE QB LEVEL IN POSTSEASON GAMES FOR BRADY AND MANNING:

BRADY 12.6-13.4
MANNING 8-16

DISCUSS.

(Or ignore it)

Mr. Flopnuts 01-13-2015 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 11267149)
maybe, but I can juggle knives better than you and I can carry three cups in one hand so ...

score another one for the dragon!

ROFL


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.