ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Computers Windows 8 (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=265863)

007 01-24-2014 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 10390615)
Slightly OT, but Windows Server 2012 is the cats ass.

NOt up on that lingo. Is that a good thing or a bad thing?LMAO

loochy 01-24-2014 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 10390615)
Slightly OT, but Windows Server 2012 is the cats ass.

what does that even mean?

it's the dog's paw

it's the ape's elbow

it's the anteater's taint

wtf?

Omaha 01-24-2014 10:49 AM

Welp, I just ordered a new desktop with Windows 8.1 Pro. I'll let you guys know the real scoop in about 2 weeks.

kaplin42 01-24-2014 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 10390863)
what does that even mean?



it's the anteater's taint

wtf?

WOW, that really is special then.

Ragged Robin 01-24-2014 08:24 PM

The problem with Windows 8 is that there's virtually no reason why you would want to upgrade from 7. The new UI is more of an annoyance than anything else and that's the only real difference. You could justify going from XP to 7 (let's just skip Vista because of the horrible launch it had) but not from 7 to 8.

ArrowheadHawk 01-24-2014 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ragged Robin (Post 10392069)
The problem with Windows 8 is that there's virtually no reason why you would want to upgrade from 7. The new UI is more of an annoyance than anything else and that's the only real difference. You could justify going from XP to 7 (let's just skip Vista because of the horrible launch it had) but not from 7 to 8.

Just my experience but Windows 8 runs better on my laptop than the windows 7 that came with it.

Ragged Robin 01-24-2014 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 10392094)
Just my experience but Windows 8 runs better on my laptop than the windows 7 that came with it.

Don't know what you mean by "runs better." CIFS/SMB performance should be practically the exact same.

ArrowheadHawk 01-24-2014 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ragged Robin (Post 10392148)
Don't know what you mean by "runs better." CIFS/SMB performance should be practically the exact same.

I mean the same programs run faster.

Hammock Parties 01-24-2014 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 10392203)
I mean the same programs run faster.

Placebo

htismaqe 01-25-2014 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ragged Robin (Post 10392148)
Don't know what you mean by "runs better." CIFS/SMB performance should be practically the exact same.

CIFS and SMB are network transport protocols. It stands to reason that they would perform the same since the bottleneck is usually either disk I/O or the network in between the systems. The only time OS becomes an issue is when you're working with non-native support, like using SMB in Linux or OS X.

I'm guessing he's talking about applications loading and there's a reason for it - much like other tablet/smartphone OS', Windows 8 apps don't shut down. They continue running in the background in a low-CPU state. So the next time you open Word, it opens almost instantly.

ILChief 01-25-2014 09:54 PM

http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...erm=cats%20ass


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.