ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Two 1st round picks for Russell Wilson in '16 and '17 or '17 and '18 (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=293050)

Discuss Thrower 06-21-2015 11:57 AM

Two 1st round picks for Russell Wilson in '16 and '17 or '17 and '18
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Clayton on show seems to hint that SEA would be open to non-exclusive Tag for RW in 2016- seems surprising but SEA will study all avenues</p>&mdash; DAVIS HSU (@DavisHsuSeattle) <a href="https://twitter.com/DavisHsuSeattle/status/612329650828652544">June 20, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



Do you sign the offer sheet if the Seahawks non-exclusively tag Russell Wilson?

Pole cumming.

Hog's Gone Fishin 06-21-2015 12:00 PM

We gave two 2nds for smith. same QB.

O.city 06-21-2015 12:00 PM

Hum.

Would be tough choice. He's won games, but he's had the best all around team around him to h3lp. When he's had to he's carried them a time or two, but without seeing him consistently best people from the pocket, I'd be hesitant to burn 2 forst rounders and a contract on him.

Added to the fact that the Seahawks don't seem sold on him.

Probably pass

Hootie 06-21-2015 12:05 PM

Lmfao ... I'd give 5. No brainer. Guy has "it" times 1000

Hootie 06-21-2015 12:06 PM

There is no ****ing way this happens by the way. Seattle will give him a giant contract guaranteed

Lex Luthor 06-21-2015 12:08 PM

This is a deal that would be bad for both teams. Not going to happen.

Nice thread, though.

BossChief 06-21-2015 12:08 PM

In a heartbeat, unless ugh steps up in 2015, BIGTIME (which I think will happen)

Those will be 2 very late first rounders.

Rasputin 06-21-2015 12:09 PM

Why can't we just draft our own with our first pick and then save our other picks to help build the team around him?


Just an idea.

O.city 06-21-2015 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 11559272)
Lmfao ... I'd give 5. No brainer. Guy has "it" times 1000

He definitely has the it factor and leadership stuff.

But 2 firsts and making him the highest paid player in football is gonna kill your potential advantage. Seems Seattle is thinking the same thing or atleast that's what they're leaking to the media

O.city 06-21-2015 12:12 PM

The reason Seattle has been able to be as successful as they have or ine if the reasons (biggest imo) is the Wilson's rookie deal.

It allowed them to stick the cabinet around him.

Saul Good 06-21-2015 12:37 PM

I would give them our entire draft for 2 years. Why would anyone possibly say no?

TLO 06-21-2015 12:39 PM

Alex Smith

Hootie 06-21-2015 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11559308)
I would give them our entire draft for 2 years. Why would anyone possibly say no?

There is no way Russell leaves Seattle. This is just a dead time in sports. Gotta talk about something

LoneWolf 06-21-2015 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11559308)
I would give them our entire draft for 2 years. Why would anyone possibly say no?

Because he's not the type of QB you give up 2 first round picks for. He's not Aaron Rodgers or Andrew Luck. He's played with one of the best defenses in the NFL his entire career. If he played in Green Bay or Indianapolis, those teams wouldn't make the playoffs.

RunKC 06-21-2015 12:55 PM

Look at all the starters that are free agents in addition to Russell Wilson in 2016.

Bobby Wagner
Russell Okung
Brandon Mebane
Bruce Irvin
JR Sweezy
Alvin Bailey
Tony McDaniel
Jermaine Kearse

And that's with Michael Bennett demanding more money as well.

Somethings going to give. If/when they pay Russell Wilson more money than any NFL player, they are going to lose a ton of talent that helped them get there in the first place.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.