Dude... we're Mizzou fans...

We haven't had much of anything to cheer for, for decades...

Now this statement is somewhat true. Mizzou was a preseason Top 10 and I thought they'd do very well this season, but it did bring in alot of bandwagon-ish behavior, but that is something that happens with any successful team.

Are you just mad that MU football became a topic of conversation on this board and no one paid attention to the mighty Huskers? I think if the Chiefs were winning it wouldn't be as big of a deal but you gotta throw people a bone once in a while.

LMAO

tk13 rocks.

Seriously... the guy always makes sense.

Better keep winning because it's not easy on the way down.

Especially when your athletic department is headed up by a senile old codger with no idea what the hell he is doing.

LMAO


Is that your response?

Thanks for reminding me that Michigan stinks for now and the foreseeable future

Did you expect NU to win?

Michigan will be ok - they have a good coach.

Nebraska and Minnesota...not so much.

Jury is out on Notre Dame, it seems they have improved from last year.

Seriously, Yale won 8 championships back in the 1880's. I bet they wouldn't have folded like a tent in the 4th quarter against OSU tonight.

You know who's gonna be good...North Carolina, Butch Davis is awesome on the college level.

Well, I didn't mean it like that... haha.. USC is good, and Minnesota is really having a good year. I just tried to pick some random team that had a bunch of championships from 70 years ago.

Agreed.

Hey, thanks for that. It sounds exactly like somebody I know.

ROFL

Might of pitched a tent looking at the Golden Girls, though.

You aren't kidding. Even this year... it's not insane to think they could run the table from here on out. Then where will they be in the rankings?

I saw a site that listed the all time winningest college football teams the other day. Surprisingly, North Carolina was listed. I think they were 25th but still.

Considering what the ACC has become it wouldn't be hard for them to become the team to beat there...plus you add in his Florida roots in recruiting....

YOU KNOW WHO WAS 3RD!!!!!11!!!!1111!!!!!

Screw it, I'm calling it now.

BCS Title game

Yale 6
Nebraska 4

Nebraska takes the lead in the 4th quarter due to their 2nd safety of the game. But Yale's experience and tradition serve them well as their 137 year old QB leads them down the field for the winning FG, becoming the first team in decades to win without throwing a forward pass. After the game, everybody goes out for a round of milkshakes and calculus tutoring.

Relax Mizzou fans...theres always the Alamo Bowl. :)

I know where you live.

I was an obnoxious ass as long as I could be tonight.

By the third quarter I began to believe my 3 MU friends would murder me if I cheered for OSU one more time. So I cut it out.

Great game to watch though.

Does this mean we can officially write off the Chase Daniel homers who think he's draft worthy? :rolleyes:

Just curious.

He's draft-worthy.

In the 5th round, that is.

I'm not a Mizzou fan, but I don't have to be to see how much of a dumb one who sucks the penis you are.

Keep on living through the Nebraska teams from the early 90s. No one gives a shit about them.

I'm not so sure about that, there is still a lot of butthurt among MU and KU fans regarding the ass kickings those teams used to lay upon them. I've always found it amusing how the past doesn't matter when it comes to our trophy case, but it DOES matter when it comes to revenge for those beatdowns. You can't have it both ways.

thank you

HOOK 'EM HORNS!

The sun did come up this morning and life goes on.

What happened last night happens every year. Parity has been good to Mizzou. Now you see the bad side.

If that's what you were getting at with your thread last week, then I grossly misunderstood it, plus it shouldn't have been directed solely to Mizzou fans as KU fans are just as guilty of it. Not that either of them are going to change their ways anyway...

Sorry if our celebrations offend you, Big 8 Royalty. We'll try to hold it down and also not drop 70 on you again.

ROFL

Heh. :clap:

That might be funny had Mizzou ever actually dropped 70 on Nebraska, but why let any pesky facts get in the way of your fun.

He's a KU fan.

Ah, then I stand corrected, however he should wait for Sam's upcoming "That's why you can't get too excited, KU fans" thread for that comment.

Sam is an excellent window in to the world of the average Husker fan. Sorry Bugeater, but you can't deny that.

Eh, there are some that are far worse than him, but they don't post here.

That is one chapped ass you have, Sam.

It's like he's trying to teach us some proper way to be a fan. Don't get too excited when you win, because you could lose next week. No shit, really?

SCOREBOARD:

Ass-pounded

MU - 52
NU - 17


ROFL

:clap:

I think we have a most excellent chance of beating Iowa St. next weekend. :thumb:

JINX!!

Poor guy STFU

SCOREBOARD:

1979 23 20
1980 38 16
1981 6 0
1982 23 19
1983 34 13
1984 33 23
1985 28 20
1986 48 17
1987 42 7
1988 26 18
1989 50 7
1990 69 21
1991 63 6
1992 34 24
1993 49 7
1994 42 7
1995 57 0
1996 51 7
1997 45 38
1998 20 13
1999 40 10
2000 42 24
2001 36 3
2002 24 13
2004 24 3
2006 34 20

ROFL

Don't be a Sam Hall, Bug.

All hail Nebraska, the rest of the big 12 should give up honestly

You should tell some of your Mizzou fan brethren the same.

OK.


Don't be a Sam Hall, Mizzou brethren.

K THX. :thumb:

Hey man, i had no problem with nebraska until Mr Hall decided to try to piss on everyones cheerios in his thread after the Nebraska loss

You shouldn't have a problem with Nebraska because of that, you should have a problem with Mr. Hall.

We love you, Bugeater. Don't worry. :)

Agreed...

Honestly, I should know better than to even click on to these threads.

...

Me too but it's like a car wreck. You have to look.

I think we should all learn not to click on Sam Hall threads.

The problem is that I can't limit myself to just looking, I have to careen directly into the pileup at full speed.

You actually do pretty well considering the number of cars in the pileup.

He can't even run into the pile correctly. Heh.

It's really the point of everything I've been saying. Nobody can take away what NU and MU have accomplished, past and present. Mizzou has come a long way since the beginning of 2007. One loss isn't the end of the world. Their recent success matters, just like the Huskers' trophy case.

I've never had a big problem with KU fans. It's always been K-State and now Mizzou. I think my relationship with Mizzou fans can be rectified.

reasons for missouri fans to get excited >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasons for nebraska fans to get excited

It's all dumb stuff to be arguing about. One team is hot and the other is rebuilding. The series has always been that way. Except the roles have been flipped.

Mizzou is the new kid on the block. Tigers' fans are like a kid getting yelled at by his mom. They don't want to hear it, but they understand it. It's OK because they learn from it.

All the smack is fair. You give a little and get a little. I don't mind being outnumbered. Hopefully we can all move on now.

so what's the point of the thread then? I don't remember anyone making one about texas tech. the only conceivable point is that your pride got hurt last week and want to be spiteful about it. whatever.

You're showing your true colors.

I'm sticking to what I said in posts 145 and 147. I hope we can all chill out and move on.

If not, he has not progressed much mentally after that age. Please note his avatar and signature... he idolaizes a fictional character from batman.

You're showing your true colors.

Yes. It's dumb. Quit starting it. We'll move on as soon as you decide to. Actually, though, I'm wondering what kind of thread you'll be starting next week.

I moved on several posts ago. So can you.

It goes without saying what you're up against next week.

I liked Sam Hall better when he had a Johnny Cash avatar.

Do you like Scarlett Johansson?

Only if she's naked.

OK, but she's an absolute babe no matter what.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/notebo...t&lid=tab2pos1

During the past seven seasons, 63 of the 65 BCS conference teams have beaten a team ranked higher than 20th in the AP poll. Indiana and Syracuse have done it. Iowa State and Washington State have done it. Stanford, Vanderbilt and even Baylor have done it. Just two teams have not.

One of them is the Duke Blue Devils, and that should come as no surprise to anyone who has followed college football at any point in the past 70 years. But the other? Oh, the other is a whole different story altogether. That second team is the mighty Nebraska Cornhuskers, a program that is steeped in tradition and ruled most of the 1990s with an iron fist. Unless you're a faithful reader of the Omaha World-Herald, it's unlikely you guessed that one.

But it's true. Since beating old rival Oklahoma in a No. 2 vs. No. 3 showdown in October 2001, Nebraska's highest-ranked victim has been No. 20 Michigan in the 2005 Alamo Bowl. So, starting with a 62-36 wipeout at the hands of Colorado on Thanksgiving weekend seven years ago, the Huskers are 0-19 against the top 19. Let that one sink in for a second: Nebraska and Duke are the only two major conference teams that can't beat a team ranked higher than 20th.

Some (Oregon and Colorado fans come to mind) might argue that karma is coming back to get the Huskers after they sneaked into the 2001 national title game even though they didn't reach the Big 12 title game. Whatever the case may be, the streak -- one that spans the tenures of three different head coaches -- is no fluke. Saturday's close loss at Texas Tech was more the exception than the rule. In those 19 losses, the average score has been 37-19.

Heh.