What stats did I use?

If I used stats, I'd tell you that Smith is worse than Matt Cassel, and the stats would back me up.

But I have said numerous times that Smith is better than Cassel.

But better than bad does not equal good.

Smith is marginally better than Cassel, big ****ing deal. The Vikings gave up nothing for Cassel, we gave up almost a first for Smith. Do you understand his point now?

Blasphemy.
Posted via Mobile Device

Not at all.

It was a Joke .

That is a ridiculous notion that is only arrived at by twisting the data to support your conclusion.

The last 2 years Smith has been pretty good.

Though there's no way Cassel is going to be the savior of the Vikings or anything, I won't be at all surprised if he ends up having a perfectly mediocre career there. The environment here was clearly toxic well beyond him, so getting somewhere else with a coaching staff that isn't awful could return him to 2010 levels. I fully expect he'll be much better there than he was here.

Of course, that's not saying much.