Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9088877)

Can I get a link to that?

Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants (Post 9087306)

I have said it recently. Maybe last week? If we are picking in the top 10, I'm not picking a QB. I would try and take Jones, Milner, or Mingo. Then, I would find a way back into the first round to draft a QB. The difference between Barkley, Wilson, Smith, and Glennon isn't that much. In my opinion, all of these guys should be going after #20. However, the reality is that QBs generally go about ten picks higher than they should. Maybe one or two even jump into the top 10 because of the cheaper contracts?

If we get Jones for example, we can deal Hali. I love Hali but it's time to quit thinking with out hearts. Also, we can use our third to move up because we will get another one for Carr.

There is not a clear cut QB to take #1 overall. That says alot. I am 100% all in for taking a first round QB. We just don't have to be stupid about it.

Last, I don't know if these guys will bust. I just said it's a sucky year to be taking a QB early in the draft.

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9088872)

I'm still laughing at people who don't want Barkley just because he is at USC, wears #7 and his name is Matt.

If we're going to be that superstitous, then we shouldn't want Geno Smith anywhere near this team.

Originally Posted by TRR (Post 9079502)

Smith hasn't handdled the press well at all this year. Saying things like "I don't take anything away from the loss" and telling a reported when put on the spot "That's a stupid question.". He needs to grow up quick if he's going to be the #1 pick in the draft.
Posted via Mobile Device

Originally Posted by Flachief58 (Post 9089062)

That's reeruned even by your standards. This teams biggest need is and has been QB. Hell, I say let's draft a QB in the first and third and pick up a vet in FA so we can have a REAL QB competition because what we have now is pure shit.

Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants (Post 9089568)

I am definately for drafting two QBs. However, if you are picking and don't think there is much difference in potential between the top four QBs, why is it reeruned? Why not take the best player early and then move back into the first and take what you can get? One of them will be there.

Also, I never threatened to sue the planet. I have stated this multiple times. It is sad that several of the usual haters are resorting to lies because their asses hurt. I'm done explaining things. Believe what you want.