ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports ***2012 NHL Offseason Thread*** (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=260753)

The Poz 07-25-2012 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Predarat (Post 8766145)
Thanks, hope you enjoyed it! And you are right, it has alot of similaritys to KC. Two major league teams, similar size, the suburbs have similar type areas. Though KC is closer to a 3rd Major League team then Nashville is.

How that town Franklin? Brian and my sis are looking at a house there?

KC_Lee 07-25-2012 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poz (Post 8766216)
How that town Franklin? Brian and my sis are looking at a house there?

It's a very nice community. Quite a few of country stars make thier homes in Franklin.

The Poz 07-25-2012 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Lee (Post 8766266)
It's a very nice community. Quite a few of country stars make thier homes in Franklin.

Sweet. I'll probably make it down a couple times this season. Apparently a bunch of players stay there.

KC_Lee 07-25-2012 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poz (Post 8766280)
Sweet. I'll probably make it down a couple times this season. Apparently a bunch of players stay there.

Yep, it's very nice but aslo very pricey.

It's 20 miles south of Nashville, sort of what Olathe is to KC.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-25-2012 10:01 AM

Have the Blues done shit yet?

Predarat 07-25-2012 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Lee (Post 8766313)
Yep, it's very nice but aslo very pricey.

It's 20 miles south of Nashville, sort of what Olathe is to KC.

This is what I was going to say, very comparable to Olathe, a bit smaller though but growing. And it is pricey. Good schools both public and private if they settle there long term and have kids.

Predarat 07-25-2012 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poz (Post 8766216)
How that town Franklin? Brian and my sis are looking at a house there?

If he wants to prove his toughness off the ice, have him get an apartment in Antioch hahaha.

KC_Lee 07-25-2012 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Predarat (Post 8766406)
If he wants to prove his toughness off the ice, have him get an apartment in Antioch hahaha.

Dude I lived in Antioch the first year I moved down to Nashville. Moved out when one of the apartement buildings in the complex I was in burned to the ground because of a meth lab.

ChiefsCountry 07-25-2012 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Predarat (Post 8766145)
Thanks, hope you enjoyed it! And you are right, it has alot of similaritys to KC. Two major league teams, similar size, the suburbs have similar type areas. Though KC is closer to a 3rd Major League team then Nashville is.

Love Nashville, its one of my favorite places to visit. I guess MLB would be the last major league sport that Tennessee needs and its the hardest to get. A MLB stadium on the Cumberland River by LP Field and downtown would be pretty sweet.

Predarat 07-26-2012 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Lee (Post 8766658)
Dude I lived in Antioch the first year I moved down to Nashville. Moved out when one of the apartement buildings in the complex I was in burned to the ground because of a meth lab.

The thing is with Antioch is it used to be a pretty nice place to live, now its a rathole. It is bizzare, it almost happened overnight. The mall used to be nice, now there are like 3 stores left.

Predarat 07-26-2012 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 8766806)
Love Nashville, its one of my favorite places to visit. I guess MLB would be the last major league sport that Tennessee needs and its the hardest to get. A MLB stadium on the Cumberland River by LP Field and downtown would be pretty sweet.

That is awesome to imagine, a baseball stadium downtown. They are wanting to put a minor league stadium there, it may be good to do what the Rangers did with Arlington stadium, make it a minor league stadium expandable to be a MLB stadium.

Bearcat 08-24-2012 09:42 AM

Wait until July to make an offer.
Make an offer that's completely ridiculous and doesn't even deserve a counteroffer.
Expect to get something done by September 15th.


Have I ever mentioned how much I hate Gary Bettman? :#

DaFace 08-24-2012 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 8847264)
Wait until July to make an offer.
Make an offer that's completely ridiculous and doesn't even deserve a counteroffer.
Expect to get something done by September 15th.


Have I ever mentioned how much I hate Gary Bettman? :#

Well, at least Denver's getting a new CHL team this year. :sulk:

Bearcat 08-24-2012 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 8847493)
Well, at least Denver's getting a new CHL team this year. :sulk:

There's always DU and CC. The Ice Breaker Tournament is in KC this year... UNO, Notre Dame, Army, and Maine. I wouldn't be surprised if the NHL comes back on NYD, similar to the NBA last year... based on Bettman's actions up to this point, it's almost like he wants a lockout, knowing he'll get a better deal and the fans will come back (and he's probably right on both counts... but should still be fired for all of these lockouts).

DaFace 09-04-2012 07:48 PM

Whoa...the Avs just named Gabriel Landeskog captain. Youngest player to ever wear the "C" in the NHL.

I'm not that surprised that they went young, but I'm floored that it it went all the way to Landy rather than to O'Reilly. Now they'd better get O'Reilly signed or I'm gonna start getting cranky.

ShowtimeSBMVP 09-10-2012 09:23 PM

David Canter ‏@davidcanter

Huge news. There will be HOCKEY this year. NHL & NHLPA reach agreement on a new CBA

DaFace 09-10-2012 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 8900165)
David Canter ‏@davidcanter

Huge news. There will be HOCKEY this year. NHL & NHLPA reach agreement on a new CBA

Who is David Canter? This is awesome if true, but I'd like to see some other sources.

MMXcalibur 09-10-2012 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 8900165)
David Canter ‏@davidcanter

Huge news. There will be HOCKEY this year. NHL & NHLPA reach agreement on a new CBA

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK YES!

ShowtimeSBMVP 09-10-2012 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 8900170)
Holy shit - awesome if true. Should I know who David Canter is?

He's a sport agent and he's getting his info from Pierre McGuire.

Simplicity 09-10-2012 09:27 PM

Anyone else a Canucks fan here? Or am I the only one.

Simplicity 09-10-2012 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCtotheSB (Post 8900177)
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK YES!

In before the ban.

DaFace 09-10-2012 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 8900179)
He's a sport agent and he's getting his info from Pierre McGuire.

I'm still gonna be skeptical for a bit. I still haven't seen a single source other than that guy.

MMXcalibur 09-10-2012 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 8900184)
I'm still gonna be skeptical for a bit. I still haven't seen a single source other than that guy.

Looking around also, and I don't see much of anything.

This is going to be a long week.... :banghead:

ShowtimeSBMVP 09-10-2012 09:31 PM

David Canter ‏@davidcanter

I was duped. Sorry folks



Look's like he got ****ed.

tk13 09-10-2012 09:34 PM

Duh duh duh. False alarm.

Predarat 09-11-2012 10:20 AM

Hope they only lose some of the pre season. Everything sounds like it will last until late Nov/Early Dec.

ShowtimeSBMVP 09-15-2012 10:20 PM

NHL imposes lockout
Updated: September 16, 2012, 12:01 AM ET
By Katie Strang | ESPNNewYork.com

NEW YORK -- What has been written on the wall for months is now official. The NHL has imposed a league-wide lockout, the sport's second work stoppage in eight years.

NHL commissioner Gary Bettman warned the players throughout this past year -- more aggressively during the labor negotiations during the past two months -- that the league intended to lock out the players if a new deal wasn't reached by midnight Saturday, when the collective bargaining agreement expired.

That deadline came and passed with little discussion and a lack of substantive talks in the waning 48-hour window to reach an agreement.

More from ESPN.com

Burnside Fans have a kind of connection with the NHL that allows players and owners to take them for granted -- and now they're throwing it all away, writes Scott Burnside. Story


The two sides remain far apart on the core economic issues of a new deal.

The NHL Players' Association said the union wanted to continue talks with the league Saturday, but was rebuffed.

"Today, we suggested that the parties meet in advance of the owners' self-imposed deadline of midnight tonight. Don Fehr, myself and several players on the negotiating committee were in the city and prepared to meet. The NHL said that it saw no purpose in having a formal meeting," NHLPA special counsel Steve Fehr said in a statement. "There have been and continue to be private, informal discussions between representatives of both sides."

Meanwhile, NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly, who had lunch with Fehr on Saturday but no formal discussions, said the league saw any further talks as futile given the significant gulf that separates the two sides.

"We spoke today and determined that there was no point in convening a formal bargaining session in light of the fact that neither side is in a position to move off of its last proposal," Daly said via email.

"I'm sure we will keep in touch in the coming days and schedule meetings to the extent they might be useful or appropriate. We are sorry for where we are. Not what we hoped or expected."

A lockout, the third in Bettman's tenure as commissioner, appeared imminent in the days leading up to the league's deadline. Bettman received a unanimous vote in support of imposing a lockout from the owners gathered at Thursday's board of governors meeting in New York.

The players launched their own display of solidarity: Almost 300 gathered at a Midtown Manhattan hotel down the road for meetings with NHLPA executive director Donald Fehr and the rest of the negotiating committee on Wednesday and Thursday.

League superstar Sidney Crosby spoke out on behalf of the players and expressed frustration in facing a work stoppage.

"We've shown we're willing to give, but they've got to be willing," Crosby said. "It seems like there's a pretty hard line there, and they're not willing to budge."

Crosby, like many other players, said he'd consider playing overseas in the event of a lockout. According to one agent, several of his players had already reached tentative agreements to play in Europe.

Whether the two sides keep an open line of communication or choose to go dark -- the league and union went months without talking in 2004 -- remains to be seen, but there is a stark philosophical divide on what a new deal should look like.

While the league wants to reduce the players' share of hockey-related revenue -- "We believe 57 percent of HRR is too much," Bettman said Thursday -- the union is not interested in any deal that would require the players to take any immediate, absolute further reduction in salary.

The sides last exchanged proposals Wednesday, but failed to forge common ground. The NHL offered the players a 47 percent of the share when fully implemented (their first two proposals offered 43 and 46 percent, respectively) while the players suggested a limited growth in share tied to revenue growth.

With time winding down and a large gap to bridge, both sides dug in and refused to budge.

The last lockout forced the NHL to forfeit the entire 2004-05 season.

Donald Fehr said Thursday that a lockout was not a necessity, but rather a choice the league made.

"If it comes to that, it's a choice," Fehr said. "It's not a requirement, it's not something anybody has to do. If that's the way it's going to be, then unfortunately, that's the way it's going to be."

DaFace 09-15-2012 11:56 PM

Stupid.

Rams Fan 09-16-2012 12:03 AM

http://desmond.yfrog.com/Himg619/sca...=640&ysize=640

morphius 09-16-2012 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 8913469)
Stupid.

yup, not what the NHL needed again...

Simplicity 09-16-2012 08:02 AM

****... Can't watch me Canucks.

Bearcat 09-16-2012 08:59 AM

Bettman has to go... I know how dumb it sounds to say he wanted a lockout, but how else did he think this would end? Hopefully they can get something done by the Winter Classic.

Well, college hockey starts in 4 weeks... *crickets*

Rams Fan 09-16-2012 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 8913787)
Bettman has to go... I know how dumb it sounds to say he wanted a lockout, but how else did he think this would end? Hopefully they can get something done by the Winter Classic.

Well, college hockey starts in 4 weeks... *crickets*

It's astounding how ****ing idiotic the owners are. It's ****ing asinine that the owners are doing this after they put themselves in this situation. Now they are trying to fix what they messed up.

**** Bettman.

**** the NHL.

Rams Fan 09-16-2012 09:08 AM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/EWQs3O_IDas" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

MMXcalibur 09-16-2012 09:54 AM

Only Gary Bettman can keep his job after three of these goddamn things.

MMXcalibur 09-16-2012 09:56 AM

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-S....26%2520AM.png

"Negotiating around the clock".
Piss off.

DaFace 09-16-2012 09:59 AM

I'll still watch for sure, but I'll definitely not feel as bad for staying home to watch Avs games while he Pepsi Center is half empty this year. Screw 'em.

DaFace 09-19-2012 05:05 PM

Not that anyone's surprised, but all preseason games are officially cancelled through the end of the month. I kind of want to go punch the owners in the nuts.

CoMoChief 09-19-2012 05:24 PM

I can't stand to watch hockey on TV. Even with it being fast paced, it's still ****ing boring.

Going to live games though is a different story. I've been to many Blues games and I have lots of fun when I go. Same w/ NASCAR....going to the event live is can be fun as hell and a really good time, but I'd rather watch paint dry than to turn it on and watch it on TV.

Soccer on the other hand is ****ing stupid anyway you look at it.

Bearcat 10-09-2012 09:16 AM

If anyone with espn3 needs a hockey fix...

http://espn.go.com/blog/nhl/post/_/i...oming-to-espn3

All of the games are around 10am-noon et, but they should have replays.

Predarat 10-09-2012 09:26 AM

Here is a message I pulled from the Preds board, hope these folks can make some noise.

Quote:

Howdy, folks. I'm a Red Wings fan from Texas, and lately I've been going around the league's message boards trying to consolidate ideas coming from fans interested in ending this lockout. There's a lot of bickering going on about who to blame, but I'm confident that every one of you will agree that we want to see some NHL hockey played, and the sooner the better.

Some folks on the Hurricanes message boards are drawing a line in the sand to cancel their season tickets if the lockout is not resolved by Thanksgiving. We could all be doing much more enjoyable things with our money during the holiday season than letting a league that takes its fans for granted hold onto it. If you're a season ticket holder call or email your ticket rep and let them know that you intend to do this along with fans in multiple markets. The threat alone might be enough to encourage owners to move towards the middle, and if we followed through it would undoubtedly shake the alleged 100% unanimity of owners in support of the lockout. This is especially true for small- and struggling-market teams. In particular, one that has to pay Shea Weber millions of dollars whether there's a season or not.

A Blackhawks fan posted a link that lists many other businesses of NHL team owners for those who aren't season ticket holders, but are interested in taking the boycott route. If all these people care about is their bottom line, hurt their bottom line all the way across the board.

http://youhavetwoweeks.com/index.html

I think the Janne Makkonen video touched a telling nerve for many, and the petition associated with it is certainly worth signing, but it seems to me that we need to hit the NHL more directly.

To that end I suggest we start a website whose primary goal will be to divert traffic away from NHL.com and the team sites that they host. Dallas Stars fans came up with a great name: National Hockey League Fans Union, or NHLFU. It can be very simple, stating on the front page "The NHL has been locked out for X days, resulting in X canceled games, and that's all I care about." I'm no web designer and haven't got the money to spare for hosting domains, but it's entirely possible that if we set up a message board where fans from all 30 markets can come to vent, plan actions, and get all of their hockey news from a source that doesn't generate ad-traffic for "the bosses" we can make our presence felt now, rather than waiting passively for the end of the lockout to launch boycotts. We might even be able to get some players to help out. Don't read their articles about how great the NHL used to be, or what coaches and owners and players and Zamboni drivers think about the latest developments in negotiations. We don't care. We care about hockey, and that's all we want from you people.

Let's make hockey happen, y'all.

KC_Lee 10-09-2012 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Predarat (Post 8995174)
Here is a message I pulled from the Preds board, hope these folks can make some noise.

While I support this idea it really does not work for our Preds. Unlike every other NHL team, the season ticket split (individuals vs. corporate STH) is opposite in Nashville.

I don't recall the exact percentage but I think that STH in Nashville is 70% individuals and 30% corporate STH.

Am I stating that correctly?

Predarat 10-09-2012 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Lee (Post 8995258)
While I support this idea it really does not work for our Preds. Unlike every other NHL team, the season ticket split (individuals vs. corporate STH) is opposite in Nashville.

I don't recall the exact percentage but I think that STH in Nashville is 70% individuals and 30% corporate STH.

Am I stating that correctly?

You are right on with that, hoping the fans will ask for their money back though, that can help. Actually hope they get this damn thing resolved.

Bearcat 10-09-2012 10:20 AM

Bettman uses lockouts as a bargaining chip and I don't see it getting resolved by Thanksgiving... IMO, the push to cancel season tickets should already be happening, because the owners know they'll already lose half the season or more in ticket sales.

Between playing NHL13 way too much and college hockey starting this weekend (along with CFB, the NFL, MLB postseason...), I just don't care at the moment. The owners should know the players aren't going to fold for anything less than 50% and the players should know they owners aren't going to accept anything more than 50-52%.... but, let's spend a few months or an entire season talking about 43% or 55% or whatever... GFY.

DaFace 10-17-2012 09:04 AM

In case you guys haven't heard, it looks like there's been sudden positive movement in negotiations between the NHL and the NHLPA. There are way too many points to list here (just Google it), but the but the main thing from a fan perspective is that they could potentially salvage a full 82-game season if they get this done - starting in early November.

Keep your fingers crossed.

ChiefMojo 10-17-2012 09:18 AM

Great news! Heard about the proposed 50/50 split by the owners. Guess a big sticking point from the NHLPA is the contract rollover aspect. Players don't want their new contracts just signed torn up.

Bearcat 10-17-2012 09:44 AM

Maybe I'm just too grumpy about the whole thing, but this could have happened three freakin' months ago.... 3 months of posturing and ridiculous offers maybe saved the owners 2-3%, and now the players take all the heat if they don't jump on board. Well played by the owners, I guess. Let's do it again in 6 years.

Bearcat 10-18-2012 04:07 PM

:o)

http://espn.go.com/nhl/story/_/id/85...-step-backward
Quote:

NHL unhappy with union response
Updated: October 18, 2012, 6:03 PM ET
ESPN.com news services

TORONTO -- NHL commissioner Gary Bettman received three counterproposals from the players' association on Thursday and left the negotiating table "thoroughly disappointed."

No new talks have been scheduled, and the possibility of a full hockey regular season is quickly shrinking.

"Today is not a good day," NHLPA executive director Donald Fehr said.

Thursday's meetings, according to Bettman, were a "step backward," while Fehr insists the NHL was only willing to work off its offer from Tuesday, rejecting the players' three counteroffers.

The union offered multiple options in response to the NHL's offer on Tuesday that called for an 82-game season and a 50-50 split of hockey-related revenues between owners and players.

Said Blues captain David Backes in a text to ESPN.com: "We feel our newest proposal took a great step toward getting a deal done. It's too bad the owners don't feel that way and I fear that we may miss an extended amount of time now."

Bettman said that proposal was the "best that we could do" and added that the two sides are still far apart.

"None of the three variations of player share that they gave us even began to approach 50-50, either at all or for some long period of time," Bettman said.

"It's clear we're not speaking the same language."

Fehr described the union's three offers, saying that depending on revenue growth, the NHLPA's first proposal does go down to 50 percent eventually; proposal No. 2 gets owners down to 50 percent with "only 5 percent growth," while No. 3 saw the players go 50-50, as long as the owners promised to honor all contracts that were signed by players.

Bettman said he was still hopeful the league can have a full season, but time is running out to make that happen.

"I am concerned based on the proposal that was made today that things are not progressing," he said. "To the contrary, I view the proposal made by the players' association in many ways a step backward."

Bettman said Tuesday the sides would have to reach an agreement by Oct. 25 for a full season to be played.

NHL players showed up in force Thursday as the union responded to the league's proposal.

“ We feel our newest proposal took a great step toward getting a deal done. It's too bad the owners don't feel that way and I fear that we may miss an extended amount of time now.
” -- Blue captain David Backes

Among the 18 players at the talks were Sidney Crosby, Jarome Iginla, Jonathan Toews and Eric Staal. The scene looked similar to one in August when the union made its first proposal.

"Simply put, the owners' new proposal, while not quite as draconian as their previous proposals, still represents enormous reductions in player salaries and individual contracting rights," Fehr said in response to the league's offer. "As you will see, at the 5 percent industry growth rate the owners predict, the salary reduction over six years exceeds $1.6 billion.

"What do the owners offer in return?"

The NHLPA scheduled a 5 p.m. ET conference call again with its negotiating committee and executive board.

Crosby called Thursday's offers "significant."

"That follows a pattern we've displayed coming into this negotiation. We're willing to negotiate," he said. "It's pretty disappointing we're at this point."

The lockout -- the third of the Bettman era -- began Sept. 16, and the league canceled regular-season games through Oct. 24. Bettman, in announcing the new proposal, called it "a fair offer for a long-term deal" and "one that we hope gets a positive reaction."

But the clock is ticking. There is only one week to strike a deal for the season to start by Nov. 2, three weeks behind schedule. If those deadlines are met, teams would be able to hold makeshift training camps for one week, then play one extra game every five weeks to make up for the lost time and complete a full slate.

In releasing the details, the NHL confirmed the offer is for six years with a mutual option for a seventh. The plan includes a 50-50 split in hockey-related revenue, which is a step forward. The NHL had proposed in July to cut the percentage of HRR from 57 percent to 43, then increased its offer in September to about 47.

Management included a provision to ensure players receive all money promised in existing contracts, but the union is concerned with what management termed the "make-whole provision." If the players' share falls short of their $1.883 billion in 2011-12, the players would be paid up to $149 million of deferred compensation in the first year of a new deal and up to $62 million in the second. However, the union believes that money would be counted against the players' share in later years.

The latest league proposal also includes:

• A listed salary cap of $59.9 million for the 2012-13 season, with a provision each team could spend up to $70.2 million during a transition season.

• Changing eligibility for unrestricted free agency from age 27 or seven years of service to age 28 or eight years of service, down from 10 years of service in the league's earlier proposal.

• Increasing eligibility for salary arbitration from four years to five years.

• Including all years of existing contracts beyond five years against a team's cap, regardless of where a player is playing. If a player is traded and retires or stops playing, the applicable cap charge would be applied against the team that originally signed the contact.

• The reduction of entry-level contracts to two years.

• A term limit of five years on any future contracts and a stipulation that the average annual value can vary only up to 5 percent. This mechanism is designed to eliminate long-term, back-loaded contracts. The NHL wants to prohibit lengthy deals, such as the $98 million, 13-year contracts Minnesota agreed to in July with forward Zach Parise and defenseman Ryan Suter.

• The elimination of re-entry waivers.

• Increasing the annual revenue-sharing pool by 33 percent to $200 million, assuming annual league revenue of $3.033 billion, with a provision that half the pool be funded by the 10 teams with the highest gross revenue. A cutout against clubs in large media markets, such as Anaheim, New Jersey and the New York Islanders, and clawbacks against not selling enough tickets would be eliminated. A new revenue-sharing committee, which would include NHLPA representation, would have input to determine distribution.

Among the items not addressed in the league's public detailing of its offer were realignment, drug testing and the NHL's participation in the 2014 Olympics in Sochi, Russia.

Information from ESPN.com's Pierre LeBrun, ESPNNewYork.com's Katie Strang and The Associated Press was used in this report.

DaFace 10-18-2012 04:38 PM

Not surprising really, but disappointing. Idiots.

That's OK, I'm headed out tomorrow night for the inaugural Denver Cutthroats game. Here's hoping it's good entertainment if nothing else.

Bearcat 10-18-2012 04:46 PM

Looks like the counter offers are all 50/50 with conditions, which sounds reasonable for taking a 7% hit.

Not a big fan of the CHL as far as the quality of hockey, but the fights can be entertaining.

DaFace 10-18-2012 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 9028815)
Looks like the counter offers are all 50/50 with conditions, which sounds reasonable for taking a 7% hit.

Not a big fan of the CHL as far as the quality of hockey, but the fights can be entertaining.

Yeah, I agree that the counter offers don't seem that bad given the salary decrease, but who knows anymore.

As for the CHL, my hope is that the atmosphere is fun more than anything. Tix start at like $12, so it's an easy thing to get into going frequently if it's fun. And at least they're now an Avs affiliate, so there's a remote chance I might eventually see one of the guys play in the big league.

Oh, and Kyle Quincy is playing for them during the lockout. That should be interesting to watch. Hope he doesn't get his head knocked off.

Bearcat 10-18-2012 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9028827)
Yeah, I agree that the counter offers don't seem that bad given the salary decrease, but who knows anymore.

As for the CHL, my hope is that the atmosphere is fun more than anything. Tix start at like $12, so it's an easy thing to get into going frequently if it's fun. And at least they're now an Avs affiliate, so there's a remote chance I might eventually see one of the guys play in the big league.

Oh, and Kyle Quincy is playing for them during the lockout. That should be interesting to watch. Hope he doesn't get his head knocked off.

The affiliate thing is cool... the MO Mavs, who are also in the CHL, are affiliates with the Chicago Wolves, and they're affiliated with the Canucks. Boo.

When I went to a MO Mavs game a couple of years ago, the Mavs turned the opening faceoff win into a 2 on 0, and the pass across the crease went off the guy's stick and they didn't even get a shot on net. LMAO But, it's in a small arena that only fits like 5-6,000 people, so it was a good atmosphere. And like you said, it's cheap.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-18-2012 10:06 PM

Greedy ****s

DaFace 10-18-2012 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 9028853)
The affiliate thing is cool... the MO Mavs, who are also in the CHL, are affiliates with the Chicago Wolves, and they're affiliated with the Canucks. Boo.

When I went to a MO Mavs game a couple of years ago, the Mavs turned the opening faceoff win into a 2 on 0, and the pass across the crease went off the guy's stick and they didn't even get a shot on net. LMAO But, it's in a small arena that only fits like 5-6,000 people, so it was a good atmosphere. And like you said, it's cheap.

Yeah, that's all I'm hoping for. I went to a couple CHL games back when the Rocky Mountain Rage were around, so I have a pretty good idea of what to expect. But still, hockey is hockey.

Discuss Thrower 10-18-2012 10:22 PM

Perhaps I'm naive, but would it be feasible for both the union and the league to agree to a "non-profit" season to get the players back on the ice while the lawyers keep working on a deal. Something like salaries are all even for every squad, very limited FA moves, and costs are covered for operations and any "profit" is locked away for divying up later.

Predarat 10-19-2012 06:48 AM

This ****ing sucks.

Titty Meat 10-19-2012 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 9028815)
Looks like the counter offers are all 50/50 with conditions, which sounds reasonable for taking a 7% hit.

Not a big fan of the CHL as far as the quality of hockey, but the fights can be entertaining.

How does the CHL compare to the old IHL? I really miss that league.

Predarat 10-19-2012 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9030100)
How does the CHL compare to the old IHL? I really miss that league.

OK, do you mean the old old IHL that was AAA with teams directly affiliated with the NHL, or the old IHL that used to be the UHL that was a AA league? The AA IHL merged with the CHL a few years ago, but some of those teams have folded or moved to the ECHL, like Ft Wayne and Evansville. The only teams left in the CHL from that league are Quad City and Bloomington.

Bearcat 10-19-2012 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9030100)
How does the CHL compare to the old IHL? I really miss that league.

I was only 11 when the Blades left and wasn't really into hockey, so I don't remember it well enough to compare. I've only been to one MO Mavs game, so I should probably give it another chance... I just wasn't all that impressed with the quality of hockey (and I really enjoy college hockey, so I'm not a complete hockey snob).

Titty Meat 10-19-2012 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Predarat (Post 9030107)
OK, do you mean the old old IHL that was AAA with teams directly affiliated with the NHL, or the old IHL that used to be the UHL that was a AA league? The AA IHL merged with the CHL a few years ago, but some of those teams have folded or moved to the ECHL, like Ft Wayne and Evansville. The only teams left in the CHL from that league are Quad City and Bloomington.

The old old IHL that was AAA. Seemed like they tried to challenge the NHL during the lockout in the 90s. It was a great league.

Bearcat 10-19-2012 08:29 AM

I think this sums up the absurdity nicely...

http://espn.go.com/nhl/story/_/id/85...bickering-ways

Quote:

We interrupt that spasm of optimism surrounding the lockout to return you to the numbing reality that the owners and players remain very much two groups mumbling in separate languages.

Imagine two squirrels in a small box and one, tasty nut to be found.

Try as they might, in spite of the absolute necessity of finding that nut to ensure both their survival and the maddening proximity of that nut, it remains just out of reach.

Stupid squirrels.

How else to characterize Thursday's emotional letdown of a bargaining session when the NHLPA claims it delivered three different proposals to the NHL only to have all three shot down in a matter of minutes?

Must have been some serious speed-reading by the NHL's negotiating team that included on this day ultra-hawks Jeremy Jacobs from Boston, Washington owner Ted Leonsis, Calgary's Murray Edwards and Craig Leipold, owner of the Minnesota Wild.

Leipold remains an interesting figure in this dispute, considering the Wild owner penned two contracts worth just shy of $200 million to commit free agents Zach Parise and Ryan Suter to long-term deals and now is claiming the system under which those contracts were written needs to be dramatically revamped.

Irony is something that is apparently lost on Mr. Leipold.

On Tuesday, it appeared we might be approaching a breakthrough in a lockout that is now more than a month old. The league came out of nowhere to make an offer that included a 50-50 split in revenues and increased revenue sharing and other elements that, in the right light, could have been construed as conciliatory.

Given that that proposal included a chance to play all 82 games and thus pay players a full salary -- whatever those salaries would have looked like under a new deal -- one might have expected the players to seize that and try to manipulate it and tweak it more to their liking.

You know, sort of draw a line from A to B.

Isn't that, after all, what negotiating is supposed to look like?

Multiple sources have told ESPN.com there was and is room within that owners' proposal to move, areas that could have and still could form the basis for negotiation and some sort of resolution.

Likewise, multiple sources have told ESPN.com that many players believed that owner proposal was a good starting point. It had its warts, of course, but it was a place from which to begin getting a deal done.

Instead of drawing that line from A to B, the players came in with proposals that appeared to be a further reworking of their earlier proposal -- or lines that went from D to E.

Within minutes of the meeting's rather abrupt end, there were claims that the sides were trying to mislead the public about what exactly the offers entailed.

The players' union, for instance, insisted the third offer was a simple plan that would have seen the two sides split revenues 50-50 as long as the league agreed to honor all existing contracts.

Deputy commissioner Bill Daly insisted that proposal is completely misrepresented and that such a deal is actually a 56 or 57 percent cut for the players and never guarantees a 50-50 split during the life of the deal, with some $650 million hidden outside the deal.

In fact, the league insisted that none of the proposals guarantees a 50-50 split in revenues.

Oy.


We imagine this tawdry little drama as a Samuel Beckett play, called "Apocalypse Shortly." Beckett was a purveyor of something called Theatre of the Absurd, so we think this analogy this works.

In this two-man drama, one character, let's call him Don, hands the other a sheaf of papers.

"Hey, read this, Gary, I think you'll like it. It's exactly what you need," the Don character says.

At the same time, though, the Gary character hands Don a similar sheaf of papers.

"Hey, read this, Don, this is really good."

The two continue to hand the papers back and forth throughout the play.

The problem is that both characters are blind.

Absurd? Sure. Just like these negotiations.

Because here's the rub. When all the rhetoric had cleared after Thursday's deflating exercise, what was left was the idea that maybe what's written on those two sheaves of paper isn't all that dissimilar.

Both sides seem prepared to settle in at a 50-50 split in revenues.

The players continue to say they want more than anything to have the league guarantee their existing contracts -- contracts signed by guys such as Leipold and Jacobs and Leonsis.

The league claimed in its proposal Tuesday that there was a mechanism to make that happen, to make whole those existing contracts.

If the league can't get to 50-50 while honoring those deals and without essentially creating a system in which the players end up paying each other during the life of the contract, it needs to come clean about that fact and come up with something that achieves that, or this process seems doomed.

But if the league can do what it purports, then there's no reason a deal shouldn't be done in short order, because the players' proposals don't seem that far off the same track.

In the end, this is less about speaking the same language and more about leadership and the notion that leadership doesn't just mean telling your constituents what they want to hear or marching down a path that is defined simply by one set of dogmatic principles, to hell with the final destination.

Leadership is about understanding how to make your path bend to the other side's so that they intersect at some point.

History suggests that's clearly not Bettman's strong point. Not with a third labor stoppage under his belt.

But with all this talk about NHLPA executive director Donald Fehr and his track record of labor peace in baseball since 1994, shouldn't we have expected more than this?

Wasn't Fehr supposed to write a different script for his players?

Instead, this union and the game it claims to love is in exactly the same spot it was eight years ago.

Think "Thelma and Louise" redux.

Anyone remember who was driving when that car went over the cliff?

Nope.

Just as no one will remember who is behind the wheel when it goes over this time, because all people will remember is the horrific sound of the crash and the smell of a game going up in smoke once again.

Unless, of course, the guys at the top can find that elusive nut after all.

Predarat 10-19-2012 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9030125)
The old old IHL that was AAA. Seemed like they tried to challenge the NHL during the lockout in the 90s. It was a great league.

The CHL is at least a level below that, its more of a AA- league, most of the teams have no NHL or AAA affiliation. The old old IHL was great.

Titty Meat 10-19-2012 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Predarat (Post 9030303)
The CHL is at least a level below that, its more of a AA- league, most of the teams have no NHL or AAA affiliation. The old old IHL was great.

Is it true the reason it folded was because it challenged the NHL during the 90's lockout?

MMXcalibur 10-19-2012 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 9030229)
I think this sums up the absurdity nicely...

http://espn.go.com/nhl/story/_/id/85...bickering-ways

Leipold needs to just excuse himself from the table altogether.

DaFace 10-19-2012 11:17 PM

Just got back from the Cutthroats game against the Mavericks. Clearly not anywhere close to the NHL level of play, but it was still an entertaining evening. I'd almost forgotten how much I love hockey.

It was fun to watch Quincey playing out there. He never made any really flashy plays or anything, but no one else on the ice had a slapper that was anywhere CLOSE to as good as his. He also executed a couple of nice poke checks right in front of me, where the other guys basically just slap around at the other guys' feet until they lose control.

Anyway, given the lack of other options, I'm excited for it and will probably try to make it to quite a few games this season. Hell, it costs about the same as a movie on a Friday night these days, and there's no question what's the better entertainment.

Bearcat 10-22-2012 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9032021)
Just got back from the Cutthroats game against the Mavericks. Clearly not anywhere close to the NHL level of play, but it was still an entertaining evening. I'd almost forgotten how much I love hockey.

It was fun to watch Quincey playing out there. He never made any really flashy plays or anything, but no one else on the ice had a slapper that was anywhere CLOSE to as good as his. He also executed a couple of nice poke checks right in front of me, where the other guys basically just slap around at the other guys' feet until they lose control.

Anyway, given the lack of other options, I'm excited for it and will probably try to make it to quite a few games this season. Hell, it costs about the same as a movie on a Friday night these days, and there's no question what's the better entertainment.

That would be interesting... I wonder if there are any other notable NHL players in that league. Denver is here in January, so if the NHL isn't playing by then, I might check it out.

Bearcat 10-22-2012 10:52 AM

Blues fans, if you would like your hockey fix... in my NHL 13 franchise, the Blues ended up as the 4th seed. I was 1-3 against them in the regular season (2-4 3-4 6-4 1-4), but they didn't seem nearly as aggressive in the postseason and I swept them (4-1, 5-1, 6-5 OT, 4-3).... in game 3, I scored with an empty net to tie it, got a penalty at the end of regulation, and scored short handed in OT.

Quite realistic, eh? :evil:

Predarat 10-22-2012 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCtotheSB (Post 9031952)
Leipold needs to just FOD.

There ya go!

Bearcat 10-24-2012 11:33 AM

So much for the Kansas City Inlanders...

http://espn.go.com/new-york/nhl/stor...yn-sources-say

Quote:

Sources: Isles moving to Brooklyn
Updated: October 24, 2012, 1:22 PM ET
ESPN.com news services


The New York Islanders have agreed to move to Brooklyn's Barclays Center from Long Island as early as 2015, sharing the arena with the Nets, league sources tell ESPN.

The team has scheduled a "major announcement" for 1 p.m. ET Wednesday. Commissioner Gary Bettman, Islanders owner Charles Wang, Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Brooklyn borough president Marty Markowitz, Islanders general manager Garth Snow, and Barclays Center and Brooklyn Nets chief executive Brett Yormark will be in attendance.

The Islanders' lease at Nassau Coliseum expires after the 2015 season, and the team has been trying to secure a new arena near the site for some time. Nassau County voters rejected a $400 million proposal for a new arena, funded by bonds, in August 2001.

Wang has threatened to move the team from the site when the team's lease expires. Wang, the founder of a computer software company, presented a plan in 2003 for a privately funded multibillion-dollar development of housing, retail and a new arena on the property, but the proposal foundered amid community opposition.

The move to Brooklyn isn't without complications. Under current plans, Barclays Center would hold only 14,500 for hockey, and sources familiar with the facility were skeptical regarding the arena's long-term viability as the home of an NHL franchise. At 15,004, Winnipeg's MTS Centre currently has the NHL's smallest capacity.

"It will be tough leaving such a historic building on Long Island, but we need a new rink and Barclays is a state-of-the-art facility that will be a great home for us," Islanders winger Matt Moulson told ESPNNewYork.com via text message. "I hope the fans that have stood by this team through good and bad times continue to support us on our quest for the Stanley Cup."

As recently as April, Bettman said Brooklyn might not be a viable destination for the Islanders because it's hard to reach for the team's fan base in Long Island and Queens. However, the team's announcement of a news conference at the Barclays Center trumpeted the fact that it is located "atop one of the largest transportation hubs in New York City ... accessible by 11 subway lines, the Long Island Rail Road, and 11 bus lines."

The outdated Coliseum -- it was built in 1971 and opening in 1972 -- is no longer suitable for the NHL once the lease expires. The arena holds 16,234, but the Islanders' average attendance last season was 13,191.

In an April interview with The Associated Press, Bettman sounded lukewarm about the idea of the Islanders moving to Brooklyn.

"Barclays, I suppose on some level, is an option," he said at the time.

Information from ESPN.com's Pierre LeBrun, ESPN The Magazine's Craig Custance, ESPNNewYork.com's Katie Strang and The Associated Press was used in this report.

Deberg_1990 10-24-2012 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 9045428)
So much for the Kansas City Inlanders...

http://espn.go.com/new-york/nhl/stor...yn-sources-say

Ouch....the Sprint Center fails again....

Bearcat 10-24-2012 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9045434)
Ouch....the Sprint Center fails again....

Meh, I don't think there was ever serious talk about moving out of town, and the NHL would exhaust all options before moving a team.

ChiefMojo 10-24-2012 11:54 AM

KC's best chance right now is the Coyotes but I have a feeling the NHL is going back to Canada again before KC. I don't like KC's chances for a franchise period anymore. Guess I just need to appreciate the Mavs.

Titty Meat 10-24-2012 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo (Post 9045532)
KC's best chance right now is the Coyotes but I have a feeling the NHL is going back to Canada again before KC. I don't like KC's chances for a franchise period anymore. Guess I just need to appreciate the Mavs.

Yeah I don't think Kansas City is going to ever get an NHL or NBA team again. We were sold a bill of goods.

Sfeihc 10-24-2012 12:23 PM

I feel sorry for the sports fans of KC. Every time a NHL or NBA team is seeking a new stadium deal the Sprint Center is used as leverage.

Looks like the Winter Classic will soon be canceled. The NHL has only a $100,000 buyout.

Bearcat 10-24-2012 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sfeihc (Post 9045658)
I feel sorry for the sports fans of KC. Every time a NHL or NBA team is seeking a new stadium deal the Sprint Center is used as leverage.

Looks like the Winter Classic will soon be canceled. The NHL has only a $100,000 buyout.

Yeah... after the Penguins, I don't get my hopes up. Not that I really thought the Pens would ever leave Pittsburgh, but once it got the point of Mario meeting in KC, it was hard not to think about it.

Titty Meat 10-24-2012 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 9045680)
Yeah... after the Penguins, I don't get my hopes up. Not that I really thought the Pens would ever leave Pittsburgh, but once it got the point of Mario meeting in KC, it was hard not to think about it.

**** him. My father and I had money lined up to buy season tix.

Crosby with Malkin would have been so sick in KC. Honestly I might have forgotten about the Chiefs.

ChiefsCountry 10-24-2012 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 9045428)
So much for the Kansas City Inlanders...

http://espn.go.com/new-york/nhl/stor...yn-sources-say

Wang is a New Yorker and doesn't want to leave New York at all. Also as an owner he would make Hunt and Glass look good.

Still Bettman hates this with a ****ing passion. If the Islanders are sold, then I would look for them to move somewhere else. Barclays Center is not designed for hockey at all, its like America West Arena in Phoenix and Conseco in Indy are.

Titty Meat 10-24-2012 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9045871)
Wang is a New Yorker and doesn't want to leave New York at all. Also as an owner he would make Hunt and Glass look good.

Still Bettman hates this with a ****ing passion. If the Islanders are sold, then I would look for them to move somewhere else. Barclays Center is not designed for hockey at all, its like America West Arena in Phoenix and Conseco in Indy are.

It's the ugliest arena i've ever seen.

ChiefsCountry 10-24-2012 01:44 PM

The trouble for a NBA or NHL team in Kansas City is an ownership group. Nobody has stepped up to the plate to get a team. More than likely you would have to find somebody out of state with money - I would look into Texas personally. I know everybody hates that idea but its the closest big money area to KC outside of maybe Chicago.

|Zach| 10-24-2012 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9045434)
Ouch....the Sprint Center fails again....

Meh Sprint Center has done really well even without an anchor tenant.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.