Bump

How do you feel about Flacco now?

If he won a SB, surely Alex Smith is good enough as well right??
Posted via Mobile Device

Man thread necromancy on this forum is ridiculous.

Absolutely would've taken the QB because ya took an lineman and should've taken the QB to build around.

Yes we should have taken Flacco but this was a dumb bump for attention to bump your own thread.

Dorsey was a bad pick because of his knee problem and still took him. Flacco would have been a great pick at the time for a quarterback.

They went BPA. Dorsey was a fine pick but needed to stay in the 43 style he was drafted for.

No to Average Joe

Oh and the Cards look old as ****

Nutthooks?

Flacco was risky and if he bust we would never recover as a franchise. Dorsey was the safe pick / true fan

That is just ridiculous. Dorsey was widely regarded as an easy top 5 pick, which is where we got him. Flacco wasn't rated that high. In fact, I believe that he was considered to be a reach when Ravens took him at 18. Many draft experts thought he was a second round talent. So don't give me this crap about being too risky. Nobody with a top 5 pick reaches on a second round rated player. Should they have traded up for Matty Ice? Maybe. But Flacco would have been crazy at that point based on scouting reports at that time.

Did you really bump your stupid thread after Flacco put up ok numbers against the worst team in the league? Quick revisit of your idiotic first post. No, they shouldn't have drafted Flacco. The Chiefs were coming off of a 4-12 season where they were devastated on D by the run. Dorsey was the best projected interior D-Lineman at the time. The Chiefs also had Croyle, who at the time, was still considered to be a possible franchise program.

Asking your moronic question is the equivalent of every single team in the NFL complaining that they didn't draft Tom Brady.

All I've ever seen from you is negative posts....maybe you should find a new team.