ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs What will the Chiefs receive if they decide to trade Alex Smith this offseason? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=311040)

RealSNR 10-23-2017 05:55 PM

What will the Chiefs receive if they decide to trade Alex Smith this offseason?
 
Opinions range all over the place on this issue, and rather than clutter up threads with my staunch disagreement with some folks, I figured a poll on this issue would be the best way to figure out the overall pulse.

If you think he'd net us something that's not listed on here (like 2 2nd round picks or something like that) then do your best to estimate what that approximate value would be.

Poll forthcoming

Ming the Merciless 10-23-2017 05:56 PM

http://food.fnr.sndimg.com/content/d...539804848.jpeg

Sassy Squatch 10-23-2017 05:59 PM

If he continues to play well enough to warrant high draft picks he won't be going anywhere.

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-23-2017 06:01 PM

A 34-year-old QB owed $17 million with one year of control left. You aren't getting a ton for that. There are only so many Rick Spielman-level morons out there.

Rasputin 10-23-2017 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 13172851)
If he continues to play well enough to warrant high draft picks he won't be going anywhere.

If he warrants high draft picks all the more reason trade him.

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-23-2017 06:08 PM

Who would conceivably trade for Smith?

Buffalo, Miami, NYJ, Jax, Denver, Arizona, SF, Minnesota, Cleveland, Cincinnati

That assumes that Buffalo will cut bait with Tyrod Taylor
Miami would have to give up on Tannehill, which is possible, but unlikely.
The Jets are possible trade partners, but that FO is likely getting shitcanned after this year
Denver: The odds of a trade within the division are pretty low, but Reid did it once before
Jacksonville seems like an ideal candidate, but they're a year away from being a year away.
Cleveland is likely to draft a QB high, as they've already ruined any promise Kizer may have had by rushing him, and they have a boatload of picks.
Cincinnati can get out of Dalton's contract this offseason, so that's a possibility.
Shanahan may have his eyes on Cousins, which opens up Washington as a trade possibility.
Minnesota depends on Bridgewater's recovery.


It probably comes down to Arizona, SF/Wash, and Jacksonville

carcosa 10-23-2017 06:12 PM

If the Jags sneak into the playoffs this year without Bortles suddenly emerging as a real QB, I bet they'd be willing to pay.

RobBlake 10-23-2017 06:12 PM

If alex can set his new play as a standard until he retires - I would like to see him with Jacksonville. Instant contender with that defense and wr corps

RunKC 10-23-2017 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 13172866)
Who would conceivably trade for Smith?

Buffalo, Miami, NYJ, Jax, Denver, Arizona, SF, Minnesota, Cleveland, Cincinnati

That assumes that Buffalo will cut bait with Tyrod Taylor
Miami would have to give up on Tannehill, which is possible, but unlikely.
The Jets are possible trade partners, but that FO is likely getting shitcanned after this year
Denver: The odds of a trade within the division are pretty low, but Reid did it once before
Jacksonville seems like an ideal candidate, but they're a year away from being a year away.
Cleveland is likely to draft a QB high, as they've already ruined any promise Kizer may have had by rushing him, and they have a boatload of picks.
Cincinnati can get out of Dalton's contract this offseason, so that's a possibility.
Shanahan may have his eyes on Cousins, which opens up Washington as a trade possibility.
Minnesota depends on Bridgewater's recovery.


It probably comes down to Arizona, SF/Wash, and Jacksonville

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rev...-they-tried-to

Arians tried to trade for Alex in 2013. Palmer is most likely done.

And why wouldn't the Jags want him? They have all the pieces outside of QB now to be a solid playoff team and Coughlin will be 72 next season.

I think it's completely fair to receive a 2nd round pick for the guy. New team can extend him.

ratchet 10-23-2017 06:35 PM

If alex plays at this level the whole season would you really want to trade that away for someone that is forsure cheaper but a question mark and based on potential?

Coogs 10-23-2017 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 13172866)
Who would conceivably trade for Smith?

Buffalo, Miami, NYJ, Jax, Denver, Arizona, SF, Minnesota, Cleveland, Cincinnati

That assumes that Buffalo will cut bait with Tyrod Taylor
Miami would have to give up on Tannehill, which is possible, but unlikely.
The Jets are possible trade partners, but that FO is likely getting shitcanned after this year
Denver: The odds of a trade within the division are pretty low, but Reid did it once before
Jacksonville seems like an ideal candidate, but they're a year away from being a year away.
Cleveland is likely to draft a QB high, as they've already ruined any promise Kizer may have had by rushing him, and they have a boatload of picks.
Cincinnati can get out of Dalton's contract this offseason, so that's a possibility.
Shanahan may have his eyes on Cousins, which opens up Washington as a trade possibility.
Minnesota depends on Bridgewater's recovery.


It probably comes down to Arizona, SF/Wash, and Jacksonville

LA/San Diego Chargers might be in play if Rivers hangs it up. I could see Smith being okay with that scenario too. Decent team, back home.

Coogs 10-23-2017 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratchet (Post 13172910)
If alex plays at this level the whole season would you really want to trade that away for someone that is forsure cheaper but a question mark and based on potential?

Yes. He's better than Watson. Watson is doing fine.

Reerun_KC 10-23-2017 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratchet (Post 13172910)
If alex plays at this level the whole season would you really want to trade that away for someone that is forsure cheaper but a question mark and based on potential?



Yes because being a scared of success chiefs fan era is about over.

There’s still plenty of question marks with smith. His playoff record is ass, He folds like a cheap lawn chair in the playoffs.

Unless he changes his past playoff history. Nothing changes

penbrook 10-23-2017 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 13172916)
Yes. He's better than Watson. Watson is doing fine.

Yes but Kizer and Trubisky are trash

farmerchief 10-23-2017 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratchet (Post 13172910)
If alex plays at this level the whole season would you really want to trade that away for someone that is forsure cheaper but a question mark and based on potential?

Yep, and use that pick on some defensive help, LB, Corner, Dl, take your pick!

rico 10-23-2017 06:49 PM

If we continue to see this PED-enhanced (without the shrunken testicles) version of Smith for the remainder of the season, he will be hyped and I don't see why we wouldn't be able to get a first in a trade.

When we traded a couple 2nd's for him, he was coming off a season (2012) where he threw for 13 TD's, 5 INT's and 1737 yards in 10 games. Dude already has 15 TD's, 0 INT's and 1979 yards in 7 games this year...showing signs of being one of these QB's who progresses after the age of 33...which as a thread a couple weeks ago brought to light, is not by any means unheard of.

Coogs 10-23-2017 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 13172923)
Yes but Kizer and Trubisky are trash

Who said anything about those two. We traded up to 10 and took Mahomes. We passed on Watson... for a reason. Mahomes played circles around Watson in preseason.

Oh, and all Trubisky does is win!

Ming the Merciless 10-23-2017 06:51 PM

My heartiest congratulations and well wishes

stevieray 10-23-2017 06:52 PM

Smith's gonna look good in teal.

rico 10-23-2017 06:53 PM

God it'd be nice if we got a high pick for him. We are going to need every high pick we can get to ensure that we are making things as favorable as possible for Mahomes and his development as a young QB.

penbrook 10-23-2017 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 13172935)
Who said anything about those two. We traded up to 10 and took Mahomes. We passed on Watson... for a reason. Mahomes played circles around Watson in preseason.

Oh, and all Trubisky does is win!

Yea nothing says trust like making your qb throw a total of 22 times your first 2 weeks as starter.

Hog's Gone Fishin 10-23-2017 06:55 PM

He'll be getting a 3 year extension. He isn't going anywhere. But if we did trade him he's worthy of at very least a first round pick.

Ming the Merciless 10-23-2017 06:57 PM

I really don't think the 17 mill will be that big of a detriment...maybe others can chime in...hes worth 15 minimum right?

Hog's Gone Fishin 10-23-2017 06:57 PM

I just feel safe with Mahommes on the bench. If Smith were gone we'd be one hit away from Tyler Bray. It's not like we're the Broncos with two franchise QBs on the bench.

TomBarndtsTwin 10-23-2017 07:00 PM

No one is trading for Alex at his age. At least, not very much. If the Chiefs don't want him back, other teams know KC will just release him . . . . . they're not taking that $20 mil. cap hit just to keep him as a backup plan.

penbrook 10-23-2017 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 13172952)
I really don't think the 17 mill will be that big of a detriment...maybe others can chime in...hes worth 15 minimum right?

Brady makes 14.4 Mil for base salary the next two years. Smith is definently worth 15 mil minimum. 17 actually seems like a steal considering what QBs are getting paid now days

Ming the Merciless 10-23-2017 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomBarndtsTwin (Post 13172958)
No one is trading for Alex. If the Chiefs don't want him back, other teams know KC will just release him . . . . . they're not taking that $20 mil. cap hit just to keep him as a backup plan.

You don't think there would be any team interested ?

If there are two teams interested, wouldn't one of them be smart to swing the deal by throwing out a bone?

Gadzooks 10-23-2017 07:05 PM

With the contract and age, the chiefs would be lucky to get a 4th.
If the decision to go with Mahomes happens, any team taking him would be freeing up 17M of cap space for the chiefs.
In this this crazy NFL world that's filled with FO folks with the onset, or in the midst of their CTE disease, the chiefs may be able to find someone to overpay.

Iowanian 10-23-2017 07:06 PM

Cleveland is the shot I called last year. They have cap room, cash, picks and a big need for a QB that can help them win.

Deberg_1990 10-23-2017 07:09 PM

Two 2nds

RunKC 10-23-2017 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 13172952)
I really don't think the 17 mill will be that big of a detriment...maybe others can chime in...hes worth 15 minimum right?

He's slotted to be the 14th highest paid QB next season which is not bad at all. Might be 16th after the Marriotta and Winston new deals.

penbrook 10-23-2017 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iowanian (Post 13172968)
Cleveland is the shot I called last year. They have cap room, cash, picks and a big need for a QB that can help them win.

Not even Alex “Savior” Smith can save that franchise

l4z4rd 10-23-2017 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iowanian (Post 13172968)
Cleveland is the shot I called last year. They have cap room, cash, picks and a big need for a QB that can help them win.

no way. they have too many holes to fill, and they won't be competing anytime soon.

Gravedigger 10-23-2017 07:20 PM

Somebody will trade for him and give us a first to do it. They can shore up their QB spot for three years, by paying his contract, franchising him twice if need be. It'd be humorous if we traded him back to San Francisco. I don't think it ends well for Alex in Kansas City, he'd have to win us a Superbowl I think, possibly get us to the AFC Championship if Andy was feeling super loyal.

The Franchise 10-23-2017 07:24 PM

2nd rounder.

Iowanian 10-23-2017 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 13172978)
Not even Alex “Savior” Smith can save that franchise

I didn't say he would make the, a contender. What I said is he is good enormously th to help them win enormous th to get over the hump. Cleveland has a very solid young defense, they've got some skill position people. What they don't have and haven't is a QB that can help them win.

They have a lot of high picks. They have a lot of cap space and cash...if any team has a reason and ability to trade for smith it's the, in my opinion. Didn't suggest two first rounders....maybe it's a second. I don't know about that

Smith is good enough to make the Browns respectable. Some 8-9 win seasons would be big for that franchise.

l4z4rd 10-23-2017 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gravedigger (Post 13173000)
Somebody will trade for him and give us a first to do it. They can shore up their QB spot for three years, by paying his contract, franchising him twice if need be. It'd be humorous if we traded him back to San Francisco. I don't think it ends well for Alex in Kansas City, he'd have to win us a Superbowl I think, possibly get us to the AFC Championship if Andy was feeling super loyal.

GMs saw how horrible that trade was for Minnesota. They're not going to make the same mistake.

Iowanian 10-23-2017 07:26 PM

I'm starting to wonder if you were THE child left behind.

Marcellus 10-23-2017 07:27 PM

If we get a 1st for Smith even his biggest haters would have to say the original trade was a good deal.

Imagine getting the 2018 first round pick we traded to get Mahomes comes back from Smith.

:boner:

carcosa 10-23-2017 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratchet (Post 13172910)
If alex plays at this level the whole season would you really want to trade that away for someone that is forsure cheaper but a question mark and based on potential?

Lol

DaFace 10-23-2017 07:29 PM

2nd seems right to me. He'll be on the final year of his contract and, while he's great this year, there's a definite risk that he'll regress to the mean.

That is, unless he makes it to the Super Bowl. That could push it to a low 1st/two 2nds.

Iowanian 10-23-2017 07:30 PM

The Vikings would make sense too. Thy have a solid team and if bridgewater is done as well as Bradford who could be. I could see the vikes making a run at smith.


2 seconds I think is reasonable. If a player agrees to the team being traded to there would be an understanding of an extension in place would be my assumption.

l4z4rd 10-23-2017 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 13173020)
2nd seems right to me. He'll be on the final year of his contract and, while he's great this year, there's a definite risk that he'll regress to the mean.

That is, unless he makes it to the Super Bowl. That could push it to a low 1st/two 2nds.

At best a mid to low 2nd round pick from a contender it would seem.

19now11 10-23-2017 07:43 PM

he isnt going anywhere. he will retire a chief and a 3 time superbowl mvp. trade mohomo for a ineman and move on.

Ming the Merciless 10-23-2017 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 13173014)
If we get a 1st for Smith even his biggest haters would have to say the original trade was a good deal.

Imagine getting the 2018 first round pick we traded to get Mahomes comes back from Smith.

:boner:

I would be more than happy to eat crow on that..

Ming the Merciless 10-23-2017 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 19now11 (Post 13173060)
he isnt going anywhere. he will retire a chief and a 3 time superbowl mvp. trade mohomo for a ineman and move on.

You're going to be getting a ton of rep and compliments for this

19now11 10-23-2017 07:46 PM

id be ok with him going back to sf, ive been looking for a reason to see levis stadium in person.

Chief Roundup 10-23-2017 07:49 PM

It is way to early for this. There is still way too much football left to play. Lets revisit this after the season.

penbrook 10-23-2017 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 13173080)
It is way to early for this. There is still way too much football left to play. Lets revisit this after the season.

This

kcchiefsus 10-23-2017 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 13172851)
If he continues to play well enough to warrant high draft picks he won't be going anywhere.

If he goes 1-and-done in the playoffs again his regular season stats won't mean shit.

JakeF 10-23-2017 07:57 PM

Depends on how he plays the rest of the season. If he keeps being the GOOD Alex then i could see the Chiefs squeezing a low 1st round pick out of him.

MAG 10-23-2017 07:58 PM

i hope we resign him

JakeF 10-23-2017 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomBarndtsTwin (Post 13172958)
No one is trading for Alex at his age. At least, not very much. If the Chiefs don't want him back, other teams know KC will just release him . . . . . they're not taking that $20 mil. cap hit just to keep him as a backup plan.

You could say this about most trades but they still happen. The Vikings gave up a crazy amount for Bradford even though rumors had it that Bradford had lost his job already.

A starting QB is gold in the NFL, if Alex keeps playing like a legit starter then people will be interested. He must play well though and break out of the Game Manager category.

BryanBusby 10-23-2017 08:04 PM

I think people are underestimating how much a functional starting QB is worth in the NFL, even with his age.

It's about supply and demand. The supply isn't there to match the demand and you have multiple squads that win right ****ing now.

If he continues playing like he is now, his floor value will be a 2+Day 3 pick. A bottom half 1 isn't out of the realm of possibility.

penbrook 10-23-2017 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeF (Post 13173110)
You could say this about most trades but they still happen. The Vikings gave up a crazy amount for Bradford even though rumors had it that Bradford had lost his job already.

A starting QB is gold in the NFL, if Alex keeps playing like a legit starter then people will be interested. He must play well though and break out of the Game Manager category.

Hate to break it to you but he’s no longer in the game manager territory! He’s a playmaker

JakeF 10-23-2017 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAG (Post 13173103)
i hope we resign him

I would not be shocked at all if Andy Reid tells Veach to keep Smith. I'm still not sure that draft Mahomes isn't part of the reason why Dorsey was fired. In my opinion, there was a power play at Arrowhead, cutting Maclin and drafting Mahomes were Dorsey's moves and not Reid's. Andy has said several times that keeping Smith his entire tenure in KC was fine with him. He could have preferred to draft another position for this season, instead of trying to draft a QB of the future.

BryanBusby 10-23-2017 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 13173124)
Hate to break it to you but he’s no longer in the game manager territory! He’s a playmaker

Right now, yeah. He peaked at the right moment for the Chiefs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeF (Post 13173130)
I would not be shocked at all if Andy Reid tells Veach to keep Smith. I'm still not sure that draft Mahomes isn't part of the reason why Dorsey was fired. In my opinion, there was a power play at Arrowhead, cutting Maclin and drafting Mahomes were Dorsey's moves and not Reid's. Andy has said several times that keeping Smith his entire tenure in KC was fine with him. He could have preferred to draft another position for this season, instead of trying to draft a QB of the future.

That's ****ing idiotic. Mahomes was approved top to bottom and the now GM was the main catalyst for it.

JakeF 10-23-2017 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 13173124)
Hate to break it to you but he’s no longer in the game manager territory! He’s a playmaker

I agree, but he must continue to play that way and not slide back into being a game manager.

Reerun_KC 10-23-2017 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 13173131)
Right now, yeah. He peaked at the right moment for the Chiefs.



“Peaked”. Let’s see what “playmaker” does in January.

BigRedChief 10-23-2017 08:11 PM

My vote was based on his continuing this level of play to the end of the season.

TLO 10-23-2017 08:12 PM

Maybe a 2nd and a 4th.

I'd take that deal faster than you can say wacky waving inflatable arm flailing tube man.

BryanBusby 10-23-2017 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 13173135)
“Peaked”. Let’s see what “playmaker” does in January.

By saying he has peaked, I'm not proclaiming he's going to go Joe Flacco SB run.

Statistically he's having a career year and we're gonna get a fat return.

JakeF 10-23-2017 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 13173131)
That's ****ing idiotic. Mahomes was approved top to bottom and the now GM was the main catalyst for it.

Unless you're the janitor that kept forgetting to sweep up the gum wrapper, you don't know this for sure.

Reerun_KC 10-23-2017 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 13173140)
By saying he has peaked, I'm not proclaiming he's going to go Joe Flacco SB run.



Statistically he's having a career year and we're gonna get a fat return.



Raking in the picks. If so it makes Mahomes the biggest impact player in KC history. While never taking a snap.

JakeF 10-23-2017 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 13173135)
“Peaked”. Let’s see what “playmaker” does in January.

If Alex plays tough and keeps throwing downfield in the playoffs we are going to the bank.

penbrook 10-23-2017 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 13173131)
Right now, yeah. He peaked at the right moment for the Chiefs.


That's ****ing idiotic. Mahomes was approved top to bottom and the now GM was the main catalyst for it.

Yea he has peaked because our defense is shit. If Alex “Aaron Rodgers” Smith was playing like old Alex we would be at best 3-4 right now.

TLO 10-23-2017 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeF (Post 13173152)
If Alex plays tough and keeps throwing downfield in the playoffs we are going to the bank.

The Chiefs defense says hold my beer and watch this...

BigRedChief 10-23-2017 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 13173116)
I think people are underestimating how much a functional starting QB is worth in the NFL, even with his age.

It's about supply and demand. The supply isn't there to match the demand and you have multiple squads that win right ****ing now.

If he continues playing like he is now, his floor value will be a 2+Day 3 pick. A bottom half 1 isn't out of the realm of possibility.

he plays like this the rest of the way, he's worth > or = a top 15 pick.

penbrook 10-23-2017 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 13173149)
Raking in the picks. If so it makes Mahomes the biggest impact player in KC history. While never taking a snap.

Imagine Smith winning the super bowl and signing a 3 year extension meanwhile Mahomes never played a snap but had the biggest impact possible. Would the Mahomos be okay with that?

BryanBusby 10-23-2017 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeF (Post 13173143)
Unless you're the janitor that kept forgetting to sweep up the gum wrapper, you don't know this for sure.

Outside of everyone saying directly this, yeah sure I guess?

We can take people gor their word or some dumb shit you made up in a message board. Tough choice.

Reerun_KC 10-23-2017 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLO (Post 13173157)
The Chiefs defense says hold my beer and watch this...



He’s talking trading for bank.

BryanBusby 10-23-2017 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13173159)
he plays like this the rest of the way, he's worth > or = a top 15 pick.

Possibly!

TLO 10-23-2017 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 13173163)
He’s talking trading for bank.

Ah, indeed he is. My mistake.

BigRedChief 10-23-2017 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 13172965)
With the contract and age, the chiefs would be lucky to get a 4th.

a 4th?ROFL

Sandy Vagina 10-23-2017 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLO (Post 13173157)
The Chiefs defense says hold my beer and watch this...

eh. He's right if also assuming the OL is worth a piddly shit. imho

RunKC 10-23-2017 08:23 PM

Will be interesting to see what happens if Alex has another 4 TD/0 INT 350+ yard performance in the playoffs and this defense shits the bed losing us the game like the Indy 2014 playoff game.

Reerun_KC 10-23-2017 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13173180)
Will be interesting to see what happens if Alex has another 4 TD/0 INT 350+ yard performance in the playoffs and this defense shits the bed losing us the game like the Indy 2014 playoff game.



Don’t care. Take the booty and send him on.

We need to rebuild too many positions. Trading him for picks helps drastically.

penbrook 10-23-2017 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13173180)
Will be interesting to see what happens if Alex has another 4 TD/0 INT 350+ yard performance in the playoffs and this defense shits the bed losing us the game like the Indy 2014 playoff game.

Sutton will get fired. Smith 3 year extension

Discuss Thrower 10-23-2017 08:27 PM

They'd be better off shopping Mahomes to Arizona unless the Bidwills suggest that Arians ride off into the sunset if the goal here in KC is to maximize draft pick return.

DaneMcCloud 10-23-2017 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks (Post 13172965)
With the contract and age, the chiefs would be lucky to get a 4th

LMAO

The Texans just sent a second rounder to Cleveland in a salary dump to get rid of Osweiler.

If Smith finishes as a Top 5 QB, the Chiefs will get a 1st or multiple 2nd and 3rd round picks, IF they decide to trade him.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.